Child mortality in England after national lockdowns for COVID-19: An analysis of childhood deaths, 2019-2023.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004417
David Odd, Sylvia Stoianova, Tom Williams, Peter Fleming, Karen Luyt
{"title":"Child mortality in England after national lockdowns for COVID-19: An analysis of childhood deaths, 2019-2023.","authors":"David Odd, Sylvia Stoianova, Tom Williams, Peter Fleming, Karen Luyt","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic children and young people (CYP) mortality in England reduced to the lowest on record, but it is unclear if the mechanisms which facilitated a reduction in mortality had a longer lasting impact, and what impact the pandemic, and its social restrictions, have had on deaths with longer latencies (e.g., malignancies). The aim of this analysis was to quantify the relative rate, and causes, of childhood deaths in England, before, during, and after national lockdowns for COVID-19 and its social changes.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>Deaths of all children (occurring before their 18th birthday) occurring from April 2019 until March 2023 in England were identified. Data were collated by the National Child Mortality Database. Study population size and the underlying population profile was derived from 2021 Office of National Statistics census data Mortality for each analysis year was calculated per 1,000,000 person years. Poisson regression was used to test for an overall trend across the time period and tested if trends differed between April 2019 to March 2021 (Period 1)) and April 2021 to March 2023 (Period 2: after lockdown restrictions). This was then repeated for each category of death and demographic group. Twelve thousand eight hundred twenty-eight deaths were included in the analysis. Around 59.4% of deaths occurred under 1 year of age, 57.0% were male, and 63.9% were of white ethnicity. Mortality rate (per 1,000,000 CYP per year) dropped from 274.2 (95% CI 264.8-283.8) in 2019-2020, to 242.2 (95% CI 233.4-251.2) in 2020-2021, increasing to 296.1 (95% CI 286.3-306.1) in 2022-2023. Overall, death rate reduced across Period 1 (Incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99)) and then increased across Period 2 (IRR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.16)), and this pattern was also seen for death by Infection and Underlying Disease. In contrast, rate of death after Intrapartum events increased across the first period, followed by a decrease in rate in the second (Period 1 IRR 1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.34)) versus Period 2 (IRR 0.78 (95% CI 0.68-0.91), pdifference = 0.004). Rates of death from preterm birth, trauma and sudden unexpected deaths in infancy and childhood (SUDIC), increased across the entire 4-year-study period (preterm birth, IRR 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.07); trauma IRR 1.12 (95% CI 1.06-1.20); SUDIC IRR 1.09 (95% CI 1.04-1.13)), and there was no change in the rate of death from Malignancy (IRR 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.06)). Repeating the analysis, split by child characteristics, suggested that mortality initially dropped and subsequently rose for children between 1 and 4 years old (Period 1 RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94) versus Period 2 IRR 1.31 (95% CI 1.19-1.43), pdifference < 0.001. For Asian, black and Other ethnic groups, we observed increased rates of deaths in the period 2021-2023, and a significant change in trajectory of death rates between Periods 1 and 2 (Asian (Period 1 IRR 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.01) versus Period 2 IRR 1.28 (95% CI 1.18-1.38), pdifference < 0.001); black (Period 1 IRR 0.97 (95% CI 0.85-1.10) versus Period 2 IRR 1.27 (95% CI 1.14-1.42), pdifference = 0.012); Other (Period 1 IRR 0.84 (95% CI 0.68-1.04) versus Period 2 IRR 1.45 (95% CI 1.20-1.75), pdifference = 0.003). Similar results were observed in CYP in the most deprived areas (Period 1 IRR 0.95 (95% CI 0.89-1.01) versus Period 2 IRR 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.25), pdifference < 0.001). There was no change in the trajectory of death rates for children from white (p = 0.601) or mixed (p = 0.823) ethnic backgrounds, or those in the least deprived areas (p = 0.832), between Periods 1 and 2; with evidence of a rise across the whole study period for children from white backgrounds (IRR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.07), p < 0.001) and those in the least deprived areas (IRR 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.10), p < 0.001). Limitations include that the population at risk was estimated at a mid-point of the study, and changes may have biased our estimates. In particular, absolute rates should be interpreted with caution. In addition, child death in England is rare, which may further limit interpretation; particularly in the stratified analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, overall child mortality in England after the national lockdowns was higher than before them. We observed different temporal profiles across the different causes of death, with reassuring trends in deaths from Intrapartum deaths after lockdowns were lifted. However, for all other causes of death, rates are either static, or increasing. In addition, the relative rate of dying for children from non-white backgrounds, compared to white children, is now higher than before or during the lockdowns.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"e1004417"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004417","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic children and young people (CYP) mortality in England reduced to the lowest on record, but it is unclear if the mechanisms which facilitated a reduction in mortality had a longer lasting impact, and what impact the pandemic, and its social restrictions, have had on deaths with longer latencies (e.g., malignancies). The aim of this analysis was to quantify the relative rate, and causes, of childhood deaths in England, before, during, and after national lockdowns for COVID-19 and its social changes.

Methods and findings: Deaths of all children (occurring before their 18th birthday) occurring from April 2019 until March 2023 in England were identified. Data were collated by the National Child Mortality Database. Study population size and the underlying population profile was derived from 2021 Office of National Statistics census data Mortality for each analysis year was calculated per 1,000,000 person years. Poisson regression was used to test for an overall trend across the time period and tested if trends differed between April 2019 to March 2021 (Period 1)) and April 2021 to March 2023 (Period 2: after lockdown restrictions). This was then repeated for each category of death and demographic group. Twelve thousand eight hundred twenty-eight deaths were included in the analysis. Around 59.4% of deaths occurred under 1 year of age, 57.0% were male, and 63.9% were of white ethnicity. Mortality rate (per 1,000,000 CYP per year) dropped from 274.2 (95% CI 264.8-283.8) in 2019-2020, to 242.2 (95% CI 233.4-251.2) in 2020-2021, increasing to 296.1 (95% CI 286.3-306.1) in 2022-2023. Overall, death rate reduced across Period 1 (Incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99)) and then increased across Period 2 (IRR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.16)), and this pattern was also seen for death by Infection and Underlying Disease. In contrast, rate of death after Intrapartum events increased across the first period, followed by a decrease in rate in the second (Period 1 IRR 1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.34)) versus Period 2 (IRR 0.78 (95% CI 0.68-0.91), pdifference = 0.004). Rates of death from preterm birth, trauma and sudden unexpected deaths in infancy and childhood (SUDIC), increased across the entire 4-year-study period (preterm birth, IRR 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.07); trauma IRR 1.12 (95% CI 1.06-1.20); SUDIC IRR 1.09 (95% CI 1.04-1.13)), and there was no change in the rate of death from Malignancy (IRR 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.06)). Repeating the analysis, split by child characteristics, suggested that mortality initially dropped and subsequently rose for children between 1 and 4 years old (Period 1 RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94) versus Period 2 IRR 1.31 (95% CI 1.19-1.43), pdifference < 0.001. For Asian, black and Other ethnic groups, we observed increased rates of deaths in the period 2021-2023, and a significant change in trajectory of death rates between Periods 1 and 2 (Asian (Period 1 IRR 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.01) versus Period 2 IRR 1.28 (95% CI 1.18-1.38), pdifference < 0.001); black (Period 1 IRR 0.97 (95% CI 0.85-1.10) versus Period 2 IRR 1.27 (95% CI 1.14-1.42), pdifference = 0.012); Other (Period 1 IRR 0.84 (95% CI 0.68-1.04) versus Period 2 IRR 1.45 (95% CI 1.20-1.75), pdifference = 0.003). Similar results were observed in CYP in the most deprived areas (Period 1 IRR 0.95 (95% CI 0.89-1.01) versus Period 2 IRR 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.25), pdifference < 0.001). There was no change in the trajectory of death rates for children from white (p = 0.601) or mixed (p = 0.823) ethnic backgrounds, or those in the least deprived areas (p = 0.832), between Periods 1 and 2; with evidence of a rise across the whole study period for children from white backgrounds (IRR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.07), p < 0.001) and those in the least deprived areas (IRR 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.10), p < 0.001). Limitations include that the population at risk was estimated at a mid-point of the study, and changes may have biased our estimates. In particular, absolute rates should be interpreted with caution. In addition, child death in England is rare, which may further limit interpretation; particularly in the stratified analyses.

Conclusions: In this study, overall child mortality in England after the national lockdowns was higher than before them. We observed different temporal profiles across the different causes of death, with reassuring trends in deaths from Intrapartum deaths after lockdowns were lifted. However, for all other causes of death, rates are either static, or increasing. In addition, the relative rate of dying for children from non-white backgrounds, compared to white children, is now higher than before or during the lockdowns.

COVID-19国家封锁后英格兰儿童死亡率:2019-2023年儿童死亡分析
背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,英格兰的儿童和年轻人(CYP)死亡率降至有记录以来的最低水平,但尚不清楚促进死亡率降低的机制是否具有更持久的影响,以及大流行及其社会限制对较长潜伏期(例如恶性肿瘤)的死亡产生了什么影响。这项分析的目的是量化英格兰儿童死亡率的相对比率和原因,在COVID-19国家封锁之前,期间和之后,以及它的社会变化。方法和发现:确定了2019年4月至2023年3月期间英格兰所有儿童(发生在18岁生日之前)的死亡情况。数据由国家儿童死亡率数据库整理。研究人口规模和潜在人口概况来自2021年国家统计局的人口普查数据,每个分析年的死亡率计算为每100万人年。泊松回归用于测试整个时间段的总体趋势,并测试2019年4月至2021年3月(第一阶段)和2021年4月至2023年3月(第二阶段:封锁限制后)之间的趋势是否不同。然后对每个死亡类别和人口统计组进行重复。分析中包括了一万二千八百二十八例死亡。约59.4%的死亡发生在1岁以下,57.0%为男性,63.9%为白种人。死亡率(每年每100万CYP)从2019-2020年的274.2 (95% CI 264.8-283.8)下降到2020-2021年的242.2 (95% CI 233.4-251.2),在2022-2023年增加到296.1 (95% CI 286.3-306.1)。总体而言,死亡率在第一阶段降低(发病率比(IRR) 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99)),然后在第二阶段增加(IRR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.16)),感染和潜在疾病导致的死亡也出现了这种模式。相比之下,产时事件后的死亡率在第一阶段上升,随后在第二阶段下降(第一阶段IRR 1.15 (95% CI 1.00-1.34)),而第二阶段(IRR 0.78 (95% CI 0.68-0.91), p差= 0.004)。在整个4年的研究期间,早产、创伤和婴幼儿猝死(SUDIC)的死亡率增加(早产,IRR 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.07);创伤IRR 1.12 (95% CI 1.06-1.20);SUDIC IRR为1.09 (95% CI 1.04-1.13)),恶性肿瘤死亡率无变化(IRR 1.01 (95% CI 0.95-1.06))。重复分析,按儿童特征划分,表明1至4岁儿童的死亡率最初下降,随后上升(第1期RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.94),第2期IRR 1.31 (95% CI 1.19-1.43),差异< 0.001。对于亚洲人、黑人和其他种族群体,我们观察到2021-2023年期间死亡率增加,并且第1和第2期死亡率轨迹发生显著变化(亚洲人(第1期IRR 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.01)与第2期IRR 1.28 (95% CI 1.18-1.38),差异< 0.001);黑色(第一阶段IRR为0.97 (95% CI 0.85-1.10),第二阶段IRR为1.27 (95% CI 1.14-1.42), p差= 0.012);其他(第一阶段IRR 0.84 (95% CI 0.68-1.04),第二阶段IRR 1.45 (95% CI 1.20-1.75),差异= 0.003)。在最贫困地区的CYP中观察到类似的结果(第1期IRR为0.95 (95% CI 0.89-1.01),第2期IRR为1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.25), p < 0.001)。在第1期和第2期之间,白人(p = 0.601)或混合(p = 0.823)种族背景儿童或最贫困地区儿童(p = 0.832)的死亡率轨迹没有变化;有证据表明,在整个研究期间,白人背景的儿童死亡率上升(IRR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03-1.07), p)。结论:在本研究中,英格兰在全国封锁后的总体儿童死亡率高于封锁前。我们观察到不同死因的不同时间分布,解除封锁后分娩死亡的趋势令人放心。然而,对于所有其他死因,死亡率要么保持不变,要么在上升。此外,与白人儿童相比,非白人背景儿童的相对死亡率现在高于封锁前或封锁期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信