Advanced Automated Model for Robust Bone Marrow Segmentation in Whole-body MRI.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Fabian Bauer, Jessica Kächele, Juliane Bernhard, Marina Hajiyianni, Niels Weinhold, Sandra Sauer, Martin Grözinger, Marc-Steffen Raab, Elias K Mai, Tim F Weber, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Klaus Maier-Hein, Stefan Delorme, Peter Neher, Markus Wennmann
{"title":"Advanced Automated Model for Robust Bone Marrow Segmentation in Whole-body MRI.","authors":"Fabian Bauer, Jessica Kächele, Juliane Bernhard, Marina Hajiyianni, Niels Weinhold, Sandra Sauer, Martin Grözinger, Marc-Steffen Raab, Elias K Mai, Tim F Weber, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Klaus Maier-Hein, Stefan Delorme, Peter Neher, Markus Wennmann","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To establish an advanced automated bone marrow (BM) segmentation model on whole-body (WB-)MRI in monoclonal plasma cell disorders (MPCD), and to demonstrate its robust performance on multicenter datasets with severe myeloma-related pathologies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study cohort comprised multi-vendor, multi-protocol imaging data acquired with varying field strength across 8 different centers. In total, 210 WB-MRIs of 207 MPCD patients were included. An nnU-Net algorithm was established for segmenting the individual bone marrow spaces (BMS) of the spine, pelvis, humeri and femora (advanced segmentation model). For this task, 186 T1-weighted (T1w) WB-MRIs from center 1 were used in the training set. Test sets included 12 T1w WB-MRIs from center 2 (I) and 9 T1w WB-MRIs from centers 3-8 (II). Example cases were included to showcase segmentation performance on T1w WB-MRIs with extensive tumor load. The segmentation accuracy of the advanced segmentation model was compared to a prior established basic segmentation model by calculating Dice scores and using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean Dice score on the individual BMS was 0.89±0.13 (test set I) and 0.88±0.11 (test set II), significantly higher than the Dice scores of a prior basic model (p<0.05). Dice scores for the BMS of the individual bones ranged from 0.77 to 0.96 (test set I), and 0.81 to 0.95 (test set II). BM altered by myeloma-relevant pathologies, artifacts or low imaging quality was precisely segmented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The advanced model performed reliable, automated segmentations, even on heterogeneously acquired multicenter WB-MRIs with severe pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To establish an advanced automated bone marrow (BM) segmentation model on whole-body (WB-)MRI in monoclonal plasma cell disorders (MPCD), and to demonstrate its robust performance on multicenter datasets with severe myeloma-related pathologies.

Materials and methods: The study cohort comprised multi-vendor, multi-protocol imaging data acquired with varying field strength across 8 different centers. In total, 210 WB-MRIs of 207 MPCD patients were included. An nnU-Net algorithm was established for segmenting the individual bone marrow spaces (BMS) of the spine, pelvis, humeri and femora (advanced segmentation model). For this task, 186 T1-weighted (T1w) WB-MRIs from center 1 were used in the training set. Test sets included 12 T1w WB-MRIs from center 2 (I) and 9 T1w WB-MRIs from centers 3-8 (II). Example cases were included to showcase segmentation performance on T1w WB-MRIs with extensive tumor load. The segmentation accuracy of the advanced segmentation model was compared to a prior established basic segmentation model by calculating Dice scores and using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: The mean Dice score on the individual BMS was 0.89±0.13 (test set I) and 0.88±0.11 (test set II), significantly higher than the Dice scores of a prior basic model (p<0.05). Dice scores for the BMS of the individual bones ranged from 0.77 to 0.96 (test set I), and 0.81 to 0.95 (test set II). BM altered by myeloma-relevant pathologies, artifacts or low imaging quality was precisely segmented.

Conclusion: The advanced model performed reliable, automated segmentations, even on heterogeneously acquired multicenter WB-MRIs with severe pathologies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信