Assessment of upper extremity functional capacity in following osteosynthesis for upper limb fractures using a novel method for determining total reachable workspace.

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Felipe de Souza Serenza, Marília Manuella Simões Augusto Rizzato, Fernando Vieira, Kevin James McQuade, Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira
{"title":"Assessment of upper extremity functional capacity in following osteosynthesis for upper limb fractures using a novel method for determining total reachable workspace.","authors":"Felipe de Souza Serenza, Marília Manuella Simões Augusto Rizzato, Fernando Vieira, Kevin James McQuade, Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira","doi":"10.1177/17585732241313363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess reachable workspace (RWS) in patients post-osteosynthesis of shoulder, elbow, or wrist fractures and explore correlations with self-reported function and kinesiophobia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational case-control study compared patients with fractures to a control group, utilizing questionnaires and 3D kinematic data.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The sample included 66 individuals who had undergone osteosynthesis: 21 with shoulder fractures, 10 with elbow fractures, and 22 with wrist fractures. A control group of 23 participants without upper limb pathologies was also established. Inclusion criteria were ages 18-80 and recent surgery; exclusions were previous upper limb surgeries, cervical pathologies, systemic diseases or nerve injuries.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>RWS, the three-dimensional volume the hand can reach, was measured with participants standing. Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TKS), and physical disability and pain were measured using the DASH questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fracture groups exhibited significant RWS reductions (62-85%) compared to the control group, with no significant differences among the fracture types. RWS showed a high correlation with TKS (R = 0.77) and a moderate correlation with DASH (R = 0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RWS is a promising biomechanical parameter for assessing upper limb function post-fracture, aiding in refining rehabilitation protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241313363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241313363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess reachable workspace (RWS) in patients post-osteosynthesis of shoulder, elbow, or wrist fractures and explore correlations with self-reported function and kinesiophobia.

Design: An observational case-control study compared patients with fractures to a control group, utilizing questionnaires and 3D kinematic data.

Participants: The sample included 66 individuals who had undergone osteosynthesis: 21 with shoulder fractures, 10 with elbow fractures, and 22 with wrist fractures. A control group of 23 participants without upper limb pathologies was also established. Inclusion criteria were ages 18-80 and recent surgery; exclusions were previous upper limb surgeries, cervical pathologies, systemic diseases or nerve injuries.

Main outcome measure: RWS, the three-dimensional volume the hand can reach, was measured with participants standing. Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TKS), and physical disability and pain were measured using the DASH questionnaire and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).

Results: Fracture groups exhibited significant RWS reductions (62-85%) compared to the control group, with no significant differences among the fracture types. RWS showed a high correlation with TKS (R = 0.77) and a moderate correlation with DASH (R = 0.52).

Conclusion: RWS is a promising biomechanical parameter for assessing upper limb function post-fracture, aiding in refining rehabilitation protocols.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信