Patients' reasons for declining a primary care trial online therapy: a mixed methods study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0272
Fiona Fox, Debbie Tallon, Roz Shafran, Paul Lanham, Christopher Williams, Berry Jude, Nicola Wiles, David Kessler, Katrina Turner
{"title":"Patients' reasons for declining a primary care trial online therapy: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Fiona Fox, Debbie Tallon, Roz Shafran, Paul Lanham, Christopher Williams, Berry Jude, Nicola Wiles, David Kessler, Katrina Turner","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrating therapist-led sessions and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) materials within one online platform may be effective for people with depression. A trial evaluating this mode of delivering CBT is being conducted. To maximize future trial recruitment and understand patients' views of health interventions, it is important to explore reasons for declining to participate.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patients' reasons for declining to participate in a trial of integrated online CBT for depression.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A mixed methods study collecting data from patients via questionnaires and telephone interviews at the three UK trial sites.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals completed a short questionnaire about their reasons for not taking part in the trial. Telephone interviews further explored these reasons with a sub-group. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative interviews were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1799 patients who responded to an invitation to participate in the trial, 40.3% declined contact. The most common reasons were not wanting: to take part in research (<i>n</i>=387); therapy provided online (<i>n</i>=284); to receive CBT (<i>n</i>=262). Qualitative interviews with 15 'decliners' highlighted that decisions related to perceptions of eligibility, previous experiences of CBT and uncertainty about receiving CBT online. Personal circumstances, depressive symptoms or other mental health issues were also barriers to participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reasons given by primary care patients for not taking part in a trial of integrated online CBT suggest that, at the point of recruitment, it is important to discuss the patient's perceptions of their eligibility and whether they would accept the intervention being evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrating therapist-led sessions and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) materials within one online platform may be effective for people with depression. A trial evaluating this mode of delivering CBT is being conducted. To maximize future trial recruitment and understand patients' views of health interventions, it is important to explore reasons for declining to participate.

Aim: To explore patients' reasons for declining to participate in a trial of integrated online CBT for depression.

Design & setting: A mixed methods study collecting data from patients via questionnaires and telephone interviews at the three UK trial sites.

Method: Individuals completed a short questionnaire about their reasons for not taking part in the trial. Telephone interviews further explored these reasons with a sub-group. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative interviews were analysed thematically.

Results: Of 1799 patients who responded to an invitation to participate in the trial, 40.3% declined contact. The most common reasons were not wanting: to take part in research (n=387); therapy provided online (n=284); to receive CBT (n=262). Qualitative interviews with 15 'decliners' highlighted that decisions related to perceptions of eligibility, previous experiences of CBT and uncertainty about receiving CBT online. Personal circumstances, depressive symptoms or other mental health issues were also barriers to participation.

Conclusion: Reasons given by primary care patients for not taking part in a trial of integrated online CBT suggest that, at the point of recruitment, it is important to discuss the patient's perceptions of their eligibility and whether they would accept the intervention being evaluated.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信