Physiologic insulin resensitization lowers cost in patients with diabetes and kidney disease.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zachary Villaverde, Roy H Hinman, Richard M Grimes
{"title":"Physiologic insulin resensitization lowers cost in patients with diabetes and kidney disease.","authors":"Zachary Villaverde, Roy H Hinman, Richard M Grimes","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2025.89665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effect of physiologic insulin resensitization (PIR) on the cost of treating patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The mean 1-year cost of treating 66 Medicare Advantage patients with diabetes and CKD who were receiving PIR was compared with that of treating 1301 Medicare Advantage patients with diabetes and CKD not receiving PIR. Differences in disease severity were compared using mean risk adjustment factor scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cost comparisons were made for CKD stages 2, 3a, 3b, 4, and 5. The total cost of treating the PIR patients was then compared with the total costs of treating the same number of non-PIR patients to determine cost differences potentially incurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean annual cost of treating PIR patients with stage 2 CKD was $11,251 vs $18,058 for the non-PIR group. For patients with stage 3a CKD, the mean PIR cost was $10,974 vs $18,563 for the non-PIR group. For patients with stage 3b CKD, the mean costs were $19,520 and $18,398, respectively. The mean costs for stages 4/5 CKD were $14,042 vs $22,124, respectively. The costs for an equal number of non-PIR patients at each stage were $345,830 higher than the actual costs of the PIR patients. There were no significant differences in the mean risk adjustment factor scores between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PIR is a possible method of reducing the cost of treating patients with diabetes and CKD. Given the rapidly increasing numbers of patients with diabetes and CKD who are Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, PIR should be considered for use by managed care organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"31 1","pages":"e11-e14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2025.89665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of physiologic insulin resensitization (PIR) on the cost of treating patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Study design: The mean 1-year cost of treating 66 Medicare Advantage patients with diabetes and CKD who were receiving PIR was compared with that of treating 1301 Medicare Advantage patients with diabetes and CKD not receiving PIR. Differences in disease severity were compared using mean risk adjustment factor scores.

Methods: Cost comparisons were made for CKD stages 2, 3a, 3b, 4, and 5. The total cost of treating the PIR patients was then compared with the total costs of treating the same number of non-PIR patients to determine cost differences potentially incurred.

Results: The mean annual cost of treating PIR patients with stage 2 CKD was $11,251 vs $18,058 for the non-PIR group. For patients with stage 3a CKD, the mean PIR cost was $10,974 vs $18,563 for the non-PIR group. For patients with stage 3b CKD, the mean costs were $19,520 and $18,398, respectively. The mean costs for stages 4/5 CKD were $14,042 vs $22,124, respectively. The costs for an equal number of non-PIR patients at each stage were $345,830 higher than the actual costs of the PIR patients. There were no significant differences in the mean risk adjustment factor scores between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: PIR is a possible method of reducing the cost of treating patients with diabetes and CKD. Given the rapidly increasing numbers of patients with diabetes and CKD who are Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, PIR should be considered for use by managed care organizations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信