How is the specialist-primary palliative care model functioning for cancer patients in the current New Zealand health system?

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jessica Young, Richard Egan, Antonia C Lyons, Kevin Dew
{"title":"How is the specialist-primary palliative care model functioning for cancer patients in the current New Zealand health system?","authors":"Jessica Young, Richard Egan, Antonia C Lyons, Kevin Dew","doi":"10.26635/6965.6750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Patient barriers to accessing hospice and palliative care (PC) have been well studied. Important, yet less investigated, is how cancer patients whose hospice referrals were not accepted are being cared for. This article aims to understand the referral process from PC providers' perspectives and the implications of the current palliative system for patients, families and health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with 28 healthcare professionals via Zoom. Participants worked in specialist and primary PC settings, such as hospices and aged residential care, and were based in seven Aotearoa New Zealand regions. We thematically analysed the interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four themes: the state of the PC system; communication issues; unmet needs and inequities; and managing care within the current system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The limited funding for PC and other health services is resulting in a decrease in PC services. The specialist-primary model of end-of-life supportive care in New Zealand is undermined by under-funding. The implications for cancer patients, their families/whānau and their healthcare professionals are moves towards a more biomedical model of PC, a reduction in training and unsustainable workarounds to manage care within the under-resourced system. Considering the ageing population, urgent action is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"138 1608","pages":"31-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Patient barriers to accessing hospice and palliative care (PC) have been well studied. Important, yet less investigated, is how cancer patients whose hospice referrals were not accepted are being cared for. This article aims to understand the referral process from PC providers' perspectives and the implications of the current palliative system for patients, families and health professionals.

Methods: We conducted interviews with 28 healthcare professionals via Zoom. Participants worked in specialist and primary PC settings, such as hospices and aged residential care, and were based in seven Aotearoa New Zealand regions. We thematically analysed the interview transcripts.

Results: We identified four themes: the state of the PC system; communication issues; unmet needs and inequities; and managing care within the current system.

Conclusion: The limited funding for PC and other health services is resulting in a decrease in PC services. The specialist-primary model of end-of-life supportive care in New Zealand is undermined by under-funding. The implications for cancer patients, their families/whānau and their healthcare professionals are moves towards a more biomedical model of PC, a reduction in training and unsustainable workarounds to manage care within the under-resourced system. Considering the ageing population, urgent action is needed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信