Conquering acceptability: A study of stakeholder inclusion practices in evaluation processes in francophone West African Countries

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Bidossessi M.G. Dossou Kpanou , Jori N. Hall , Kathleen D. Kelsey
{"title":"Conquering acceptability: A study of stakeholder inclusion practices in evaluation processes in francophone West African Countries","authors":"Bidossessi M.G. Dossou Kpanou ,&nbsp;Jori N. Hall ,&nbsp;Kathleen D. Kelsey","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluation practices in the French-speaking countries of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) are poorly understood and infrequently documented. Our study is a descriptive analysis that elucidates how stakeholders are conceptualized and involved in evaluation processes in WAEMU. In these countries, evaluators are concerned about the weak stakeholder involvement in evaluation activity and call for greater stakeholder engagement, juxtaposed to the challenges of doing so. This embedded mixed methods design allowed us to examine stakeholders’ involvement in evaluation processes in the French-speaking WAEMU countries. The results revealed that stakeholders were conceptualized either through structured categorization using established categories in the evaluation literature or through contextual categorization, depending on their relevance to the evaluation process and the information they can provide. Regardless of these categorizations, the primary rationale for stakeholder engagement processes was to achieve acceptable or credible results and to engage the most influential stakeholders. These findings contribute to the evaluation literature by offering a deeper understanding of stakeholder involvement in the WAEMU context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation practices in the French-speaking countries of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) are poorly understood and infrequently documented. Our study is a descriptive analysis that elucidates how stakeholders are conceptualized and involved in evaluation processes in WAEMU. In these countries, evaluators are concerned about the weak stakeholder involvement in evaluation activity and call for greater stakeholder engagement, juxtaposed to the challenges of doing so. This embedded mixed methods design allowed us to examine stakeholders’ involvement in evaluation processes in the French-speaking WAEMU countries. The results revealed that stakeholders were conceptualized either through structured categorization using established categories in the evaluation literature or through contextual categorization, depending on their relevance to the evaluation process and the information they can provide. Regardless of these categorizations, the primary rationale for stakeholder engagement processes was to achieve acceptable or credible results and to engage the most influential stakeholders. These findings contribute to the evaluation literature by offering a deeper understanding of stakeholder involvement in the WAEMU context.
征服可接受性:西非法语国家评估过程中利益相关者包容实践的研究。
西非经济和货币联盟(西非货币联盟)法语国家的评价做法不为人了解,也很少有记录。我们的研究是一项描述性分析,阐明了利益相关者是如何概念化并参与WAEMU的评估过程的。在这些国家,评价人员对利益攸关方在评价活动中的参与程度较弱感到担忧,并呼吁利益攸关方加强参与,同时考虑到这样做所面临的挑战。这种嵌入式混合方法设计使我们能够检查法语西非货币联盟国家中利益相关者对评估过程的参与情况。结果表明,根据利益相关者与评估过程的相关性和他们可以提供的信息,通过使用评估文献中已建立的类别的结构化分类或通过上下文分类对利益相关者进行概念化。无论这些分类如何,利益相关者参与进程的主要理由是实现可接受或可信的结果,并让最有影响力的利益相关者参与。这些发现通过提供对WAEMU背景下利益相关者参与的更深入理解,为评估文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信