Qualitative systematic review on the lived experience of functional neurological disorder.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-01-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000694
Andrea Szasz, Anthony Korner, Loyola McLean
{"title":"Qualitative systematic review on the lived experience of functional neurological disorder.","authors":"Andrea Szasz, Anthony Korner, Loyola McLean","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a complex disorder, recently attracting much research into aetiology and treatment. However, there is limited research on the patient's lived experience. This paper addresses this gap to ask: 'What is the subjective life experience of adult patients living with FND?'</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 1980 to 2020, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL and Embase were searched for English language qualitative adult research. The disciplines used general medicine, psychiatry, physiotherapy, nursing, neurology, psychosomatic medicine and occupational therapy. The qualitative literature search included book chapters, theses, fellowship reports and conference articles as well as peer-reviewed scientific journals.The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess 33 papers, with eight papers included in the final synthesis. Nine additional papers, suggested during review, were evaluated but excluded from synthesis, though incorporated elsewhere in the paper. Two authors used an integrative immersion approach to identify the literature's main themes using line-by-line and top-down methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight main themes were identified: lost, body-mind dualism, preceding stressful events, relatedness, stigma, the battle or fight, the burden and losses of the illness and trust versus mistrust. From these emerged a central overarching theme of relationally regulated selves, which posits the essence of the lived experience of FND as responding to stressful experiences within a relational, regulatory context.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalent themes give valuable insight into the lived experience of FND and the impact of stressors, past and present, and the relational environment in the development of and recovery from the disorder. Further research is needed to support the formulation of the patient experience and cocreated recovery pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a complex disorder, recently attracting much research into aetiology and treatment. However, there is limited research on the patient's lived experience. This paper addresses this gap to ask: 'What is the subjective life experience of adult patients living with FND?'

Methods: From 1980 to 2020, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL and Embase were searched for English language qualitative adult research. The disciplines used general medicine, psychiatry, physiotherapy, nursing, neurology, psychosomatic medicine and occupational therapy. The qualitative literature search included book chapters, theses, fellowship reports and conference articles as well as peer-reviewed scientific journals.The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess 33 papers, with eight papers included in the final synthesis. Nine additional papers, suggested during review, were evaluated but excluded from synthesis, though incorporated elsewhere in the paper. Two authors used an integrative immersion approach to identify the literature's main themes using line-by-line and top-down methods.

Results: Eight main themes were identified: lost, body-mind dualism, preceding stressful events, relatedness, stigma, the battle or fight, the burden and losses of the illness and trust versus mistrust. From these emerged a central overarching theme of relationally regulated selves, which posits the essence of the lived experience of FND as responding to stressful experiences within a relational, regulatory context.

Conclusions: The prevalent themes give valuable insight into the lived experience of FND and the impact of stressors, past and present, and the relational environment in the development of and recovery from the disorder. Further research is needed to support the formulation of the patient experience and cocreated recovery pathways.

功能性神经障碍生活经验的定性系统综述。
目的:功能性神经障碍(FND)是一种复杂的疾病,近年来在病因和治疗方面引起了广泛的研究。然而,对患者生活经历的研究有限。本文解决了这一差距,并提出了这样的问题:“患有FND的成年患者的主观生活体验是什么?”方法:1980 - 2020年,检索Medline、PsycInfo、Scopus、Science Direct、PubMed、CINAHL和Embase等英文成人定性研究。学科包括普通医学、精神病学、物理治疗、护理学、神经病学、心身医学和职业治疗。定性文献检索包括书籍章节、论文、奖学金报告、会议文章以及同行评议的科学期刊。关键评估技能计划工具被用来评估33篇论文,其中8篇论文被纳入最终综合。在审查期间提出的另外九篇论文被评估,但被排除在综合之外,但在论文的其他地方被纳入。两位作者使用了一种综合的浸入式方法,通过逐行和自上而下的方法来确定文献的主题。结果:确定了八个主题:失落,身心二元论,之前的压力事件,相关性,耻辱,战斗或战斗,疾病的负担和损失以及信任与不信任。由此出现了一个关系调节自我的中心主题,它假定FND生活经验的本质是在关系、调节背景下对压力经历的反应。结论:流行的主题对FND的生活经历、过去和现在的压力源以及相关环境在该障碍的发展和恢复中的影响提供了有价值的见解。需要进一步的研究来支持制定患者体验和共同创造的康复途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信