Optimising early detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of quantitative screening tools for primary care.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-01-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000913
Sean Inzerillo, Pemla Jagtiani, Salazar Jones
{"title":"Optimising early detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of quantitative screening tools for primary care.","authors":"Sean Inzerillo, Pemla Jagtiani, Salazar Jones","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is often challenging due to subtle, non-specific symptoms, limited disease awareness and a lack of definitive diagnostic criteria. As primary care physicians are typically the first to encounter patients with early DCM, equipping them with effective screening tools is crucial for reducing diagnostic delays and improving patient outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of quantitative screening methods for DCM that can be implemented in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted across PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library up to July 2024 using keywords relevant to DCM screening. Studies were included if they evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of DCM screening tools applicable to primary care settings. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 14 studies evaluating 18 screening methods for DCM. Questionnaires consistently showed high diagnostic accuracy, with Youden indices exceeding 0.60, while only three out of nine conventional physical performance tests met the same threshold. Sensor-assisted tests, particularly those using advanced technology like finger-wearable gyro sensors, exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy but present challenges related to accessibility and learning curves.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the potential of quantitative screening methods for early DCM detection in primary care. While questionnaires and conventional tests are effective and accessible, sensor-assisted tests offer greater accuracy but face implementation challenges. A tailored, multifaceted approach is crucial for improving outcomes. Future research should focus on validating these tools in diverse populations and standardising diagnostic criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is often challenging due to subtle, non-specific symptoms, limited disease awareness and a lack of definitive diagnostic criteria. As primary care physicians are typically the first to encounter patients with early DCM, equipping them with effective screening tools is crucial for reducing diagnostic delays and improving patient outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of quantitative screening methods for DCM that can be implemented in primary care settings.

Methods: A systematic search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted across PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library up to July 2024 using keywords relevant to DCM screening. Studies were included if they evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of DCM screening tools applicable to primary care settings. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Results: The search identified 14 studies evaluating 18 screening methods for DCM. Questionnaires consistently showed high diagnostic accuracy, with Youden indices exceeding 0.60, while only three out of nine conventional physical performance tests met the same threshold. Sensor-assisted tests, particularly those using advanced technology like finger-wearable gyro sensors, exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy but present challenges related to accessibility and learning curves.

Conclusion: This review highlights the potential of quantitative screening methods for early DCM detection in primary care. While questionnaires and conventional tests are effective and accessible, sensor-assisted tests offer greater accuracy but face implementation challenges. A tailored, multifaceted approach is crucial for improving outcomes. Future research should focus on validating these tools in diverse populations and standardising diagnostic criteria.

优化退行性颈椎病的早期检测:对初级保健定量筛查工具的系统回顾。
背景:早期诊断退行性颈脊髓病(DCM)往往是具有挑战性的,由于微妙的,非特异性的症状,有限的疾病认识和缺乏明确的诊断标准。由于初级保健医生通常是第一个遇到早期DCM患者的人,因此为他们配备有效的筛查工具对于减少诊断延误和改善患者预后至关重要。本系统综述评估了可在初级保健机构实施的DCM定量筛查方法的有效性。方法:使用与DCM筛选相关的关键词,在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中进行了系统检索,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统检索,检索截止到2024年7月。如果研究评估了适用于初级保健机构的DCM筛查工具的敏感性和特异性,则纳入研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具评估研究质量。结果:检索确定了14项研究,评估了18种DCM筛查方法。问卷调查始终显示出较高的诊断准确性,约登指数超过0.60,而9项常规体能测试中只有3项达到相同的阈值。传感器辅助测试,特别是那些使用手指可穿戴陀螺仪传感器等先进技术的测试,显示出最高的诊断准确性,但存在与可访问性和学习曲线相关的挑战。结论:本综述强调了定量筛查方法在初级保健中早期发现DCM的潜力。虽然问卷调查和传统测试是有效和容易获得的,但传感器辅助测试提供了更高的准确性,但在实施方面面临挑战。量身定制的、多方面的方法对改善结果至关重要。未来的研究应侧重于在不同人群中验证这些工具,并使诊断标准标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信