Outpatient palliative care and end-of-life care intensity: linking Massachusetts Cancer Registry with All-Payer Claims Database.

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Nancy L Keating, Joel S Weissman, Alexi A Wright, Robert Wolf, Susan Gershman, Richard Knowlton, John Z Ayanian
{"title":"Outpatient palliative care and end-of-life care intensity: linking Massachusetts Cancer Registry with All-Payer Claims Database.","authors":"Nancy L Keating, Joel S Weissman, Alexi A Wright, Robert Wolf, Susan Gershman, Richard Knowlton, John Z Ayanian","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early palliative care is associated with better outcomes for patients with advanced-stage cancers. Using a novel data linkage, we assessed outpatient palliative care use before death and its association with end-of-life care intensity and variation across 8 provider networks in Massachusetts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked Massachusetts Cancer Registry and the All-Payer Claims Database for individuals with commercial insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare Advantage diagnosed with colorectal, lung, prostate, and breast cancers from 2010 to 2013 who died by December 31, 2014. We characterized outpatient palliative care visits in the 6 months before death and identified end-of-life hospitalizations, emergency department visits, intensive care unit admissions, chemotherapy, no/late hospice enrollment, and in-hospital deaths. We used logistic regression to assess factors associated with outpatient palliative care and ordinal logistic regression with provider network fixed effects to assess the association of palliative care with a composite measure summing individual end-of-life intensity measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6279 decedents, 11.3% had at least 1 outpatient palliative care visit. Palliative care use varied across provider networks from 6.0% to 19.3%. In adjusted analyses, younger age, longer duration from diagnosis to death, death in 2012-2014 vs 2010, and provider network were associated with palliative care visits (all P values less than .05). End-of-life care intensity varied across provider networks. Patients with palliative care visits had lower adjusted odds of receiving intensive end-of-life care (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62 per additional measure of end-of-life intensity, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient palliative care use varied substantially among regional provider networks and was associated with less intensive end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early palliative care is associated with better outcomes for patients with advanced-stage cancers. Using a novel data linkage, we assessed outpatient palliative care use before death and its association with end-of-life care intensity and variation across 8 provider networks in Massachusetts.

Methods: We linked Massachusetts Cancer Registry and the All-Payer Claims Database for individuals with commercial insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare Advantage diagnosed with colorectal, lung, prostate, and breast cancers from 2010 to 2013 who died by December 31, 2014. We characterized outpatient palliative care visits in the 6 months before death and identified end-of-life hospitalizations, emergency department visits, intensive care unit admissions, chemotherapy, no/late hospice enrollment, and in-hospital deaths. We used logistic regression to assess factors associated with outpatient palliative care and ordinal logistic regression with provider network fixed effects to assess the association of palliative care with a composite measure summing individual end-of-life intensity measures.

Results: Among 6279 decedents, 11.3% had at least 1 outpatient palliative care visit. Palliative care use varied across provider networks from 6.0% to 19.3%. In adjusted analyses, younger age, longer duration from diagnosis to death, death in 2012-2014 vs 2010, and provider network were associated with palliative care visits (all P values less than .05). End-of-life care intensity varied across provider networks. Patients with palliative care visits had lower adjusted odds of receiving intensive end-of-life care (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62 per additional measure of end-of-life intensity, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.72).

Conclusions: Outpatient palliative care use varied substantially among regional provider networks and was associated with less intensive end-of-life care.

门诊姑息治疗和临终关怀强度:将马萨诸塞州癌症登记与所有付款人索赔联系起来。
背景:早期姑息治疗与晚期癌症患者更好的预后相关。使用一种新颖的数据链接,我们评估了临终前门诊姑息治疗的使用及其与8个提供者网络的临终关怀强度和变化的关联。方法:我们将马萨诸塞州癌症登记处和所有付款人索赔数据库与2010年至2013年期间被诊断患有结直肠癌、肺癌、前列腺癌和乳腺癌并于2014年12月31日死亡的具有商业保险、医疗补助或医疗保险优势的个人联系起来。我们分析了患者死亡前6个月的门诊姑息治疗就诊情况,并确定了临终住院、急诊科就诊、重症监护病房就诊、化疗、无/晚期安宁疗护登记和院内死亡。我们使用逻辑回归来评估与门诊姑息治疗相关的因素,并使用具有提供者网络固定效应的有序逻辑回归来评估姑息治疗与汇总个人临终强度测量的复合测量的关联。结果:在6279名死者中,11.3%至少有一次门诊姑息治疗就诊。各个医疗服务提供者网络的姑息治疗使用率从6.0%到19.3%不等。在调整后的分析中,年龄更小、从诊断到死亡的持续时间更长、2012-2014年与2010年的死亡人数以及医疗服务提供者网络与姑息治疗就诊相关(均为P)。结论:门诊姑息治疗的使用在不同地区医疗服务提供者网络之间差异很大,并且与较低的临终关怀相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信