Nicholas Galouzis, Maria Khawam, Evelyn V. Alexander, Lusine Mesropyan, Carrie Luu, Mohammad R. Khreiss, Taylor S. Riall
{"title":"Quality of life and social health in patients after pancreatic surgery","authors":"Nicholas Galouzis, Maria Khawam, Evelyn V. Alexander, Lusine Mesropyan, Carrie Luu, Mohammad R. Khreiss, Taylor S. Riall","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinicians lack robust data on quality of life (QOL) and social functioning after pancreatectomy limiting their ability guide patient decision making aligned with patients’ goals of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cross-sectional survey study, we administered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire, pancreas-specific QLQ-PAN26, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles, and PROMIS activities and social isolation scales to all elective pancreatectomies (2021–2023). Results were compared with both normative data and between groups to determine factors predicting better QOL with a >10–12-point change considered clinically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 143 patients were included; 71 (49.6%) completed the distributed surveys. The average age of responders was 59.9 ± 16.1 years with 56.3% men. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (54.9%) was performed for malignancy in 67.6% of cases. Compared with normative population controls, postpancreatectomy patients reported lower role functioning scores (67.2 ± 28.7 vs 81.7 ± 28.2, 14.5 score difference) but less social isolation (40.6 ± 5.7 vs 50.0 ± 10.0, 9.4 score difference). Compared with patients with benign disease, those with malignancy reported clinically significant worse social functioning; more fatigue, pain, constipation, change in taste, weight loss, weakness, and altered bowel habits; worse body image; and increased worries about the future. Despite more symptoms, they were more satisfied with the healthcare they received (all >10-point score difference).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>QOL and social health are affected by pancreatic resection and outcomes differ whether surgery was performed for benign or malignant disease. These issues are largely unaddressed and are potential targets for intervention to improve QOL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"29 3","pages":"Article 101969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X25000289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Clinicians lack robust data on quality of life (QOL) and social functioning after pancreatectomy limiting their ability guide patient decision making aligned with patients’ goals of care.
Methods
In this cross-sectional survey study, we administered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire, pancreas-specific QLQ-PAN26, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles, and PROMIS activities and social isolation scales to all elective pancreatectomies (2021–2023). Results were compared with both normative data and between groups to determine factors predicting better QOL with a >10–12-point change considered clinically significant.
Results
A total of 143 patients were included; 71 (49.6%) completed the distributed surveys. The average age of responders was 59.9 ± 16.1 years with 56.3% men. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (54.9%) was performed for malignancy in 67.6% of cases. Compared with normative population controls, postpancreatectomy patients reported lower role functioning scores (67.2 ± 28.7 vs 81.7 ± 28.2, 14.5 score difference) but less social isolation (40.6 ± 5.7 vs 50.0 ± 10.0, 9.4 score difference). Compared with patients with benign disease, those with malignancy reported clinically significant worse social functioning; more fatigue, pain, constipation, change in taste, weight loss, weakness, and altered bowel habits; worse body image; and increased worries about the future. Despite more symptoms, they were more satisfied with the healthcare they received (all >10-point score difference).
Conclusion
QOL and social health are affected by pancreatic resection and outcomes differ whether surgery was performed for benign or malignant disease. These issues are largely unaddressed and are potential targets for intervention to improve QOL.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.