Incidence and Outcomes of Secondary Bladder Cancer Following Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Akihiro Matsukawa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Marcin Miszczyk, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Tamás Fazekas, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Robert J Schulz, Giulio Litterio, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Paweł Rajwa, Fumihiko Urabe, Keiichiro Mori, Jun Miki, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Piotr Chlosta, Takahiro Kimura, Olivier Cussenot, Shahrokh F Shariat
{"title":"Incidence and Outcomes of Secondary Bladder Cancer Following Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Akihiro Matsukawa, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Marcin Miszczyk, Mehdi Kardoust Parizi, Tamás Fazekas, Ichiro Tsuboi, Stefano Mancon, Robert J Schulz, Giulio Litterio, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Paweł Rajwa, Fumihiko Urabe, Keiichiro Mori, Jun Miki, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Piotr Chlosta, Takahiro Kimura, Olivier Cussenot, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>There is an established association between secondary bladder cancers (SBCs) and radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC), which remains a significant concern. Our aim was to update the evidence on SBC incidence across different RT modalities and to compare oncological outcomes for patients diagnosed with SBC to those diagnosed with primary bladder cancer (PBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies on SBC following PC. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to compare SBC incidence in terms of odds ratios (ORs) between RT modalities (external beam radiation therapy [EBRT], brachytherapy [BT], and BT + EBRT) and PBC incidence after radical prostatectomy (RP). SBC incidence data are presented as proportions, and pairwise meta-analyses were used to compare overall survival (OS) between SBC and PBC using hazard ratios (HRs).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Thirty-one studies (n = 576 341) were included. All RT modalities significantly increased the risk of SBC in comparison to RP at all time points investigated. BT alone had similar long-term SBC risk in comparison to EBRT (OR 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-1.23 at 10 yr; OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.24-1.06 at 15 yr). There was no significant difference in OS between SBC and PBC in the overall cohort. However, among patients requiring radical cystectomy (RC), SBC resulted in a significant decrease in OS in comparison to PBC (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.06-2.26; p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>All RT modalities increased the risk of SBC at each post-RT time point investigated. SBC patients requiring RC have worse survival than those with PBC. Our results highlight the need for ongoing surveillance and early detection. Despite the rarity of SBC, clinicians should monitor bladder symptoms in PC patients after RT. These data need to be included in the shared decision-making process with patients regarding therapeutic decisions to raise awareness of SBC in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.12.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: There is an established association between secondary bladder cancers (SBCs) and radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC), which remains a significant concern. Our aim was to update the evidence on SBC incidence across different RT modalities and to compare oncological outcomes for patients diagnosed with SBC to those diagnosed with primary bladder cancer (PBC).

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies on SBC following PC. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to compare SBC incidence in terms of odds ratios (ORs) between RT modalities (external beam radiation therapy [EBRT], brachytherapy [BT], and BT + EBRT) and PBC incidence after radical prostatectomy (RP). SBC incidence data are presented as proportions, and pairwise meta-analyses were used to compare overall survival (OS) between SBC and PBC using hazard ratios (HRs).

Key findings and limitations: Thirty-one studies (n = 576 341) were included. All RT modalities significantly increased the risk of SBC in comparison to RP at all time points investigated. BT alone had similar long-term SBC risk in comparison to EBRT (OR 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-1.23 at 10 yr; OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.24-1.06 at 15 yr). There was no significant difference in OS between SBC and PBC in the overall cohort. However, among patients requiring radical cystectomy (RC), SBC resulted in a significant decrease in OS in comparison to PBC (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.06-2.26; p = 0.02).

Conclusions and clinical implications: All RT modalities increased the risk of SBC at each post-RT time point investigated. SBC patients requiring RC have worse survival than those with PBC. Our results highlight the need for ongoing surveillance and early detection. Despite the rarity of SBC, clinicians should monitor bladder symptoms in PC patients after RT. These data need to be included in the shared decision-making process with patients regarding therapeutic decisions to raise awareness of SBC in this setting.

前列腺癌放疗后继发膀胱癌的发病率和预后:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:继发性膀胱癌(sbc)与前列腺癌(PC)放疗(RT)之间存在明确的关联,这仍然是一个值得关注的问题。我们的目的是更新不同放疗方式下SBC发病率的证据,并比较诊断为SBC的患者与诊断为原发性膀胱癌(PBC)的患者的肿瘤预后。方法:检索MEDLINE、Scopus和Web of Science,查找PC后SBC的相关研究。进行两两荟萃分析,比较放疗方式(外束放疗[EBRT]、近距离放疗[BT]和BT + EBRT)与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后PBC发病率之间的比值比(ORs)。SBC发病率数据以比例表示,两两荟萃分析使用风险比(hr)比较SBC和PBC的总生存期(OS)。主要发现和局限性:纳入31项研究(n = 576 341)。在调查的所有时间点,与RP相比,所有RT方式均显著增加SBC的风险。与EBRT相比,单独使用BT的长期SBC风险相似(OR 0.56, 95%置信区间[CI] 0.25-1.23, 10年;OR 0.51, 15年时95% CI 0.24-1.06)。在整个队列中,SBC和PBC之间的OS无显著差异。然而,在需要根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的患者中,与PBC相比,SBC导致OS显著降低(HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.06-2.26;p = 0.02)。结论和临床意义:所有的放疗方式在每个放疗后时间点都增加了SBC的风险。SBC患者需要RC的生存率比PBC患者差。我们的研究结果强调了持续监测和早期发现的必要性。尽管SBC罕见,但临床医生应监测rt后PC患者的膀胱症状。这些数据需要纳入与患者共同决策的治疗决策过程中,以提高患者对SBC的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信