Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound of the posterior fatpad in elbow fractures.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Svenja L Haak, Thea van der Veen, Renate Stolmeijer, Annemieke E Boendermaker, Brigitta Britt Ym van der Kolk, Jan C Ter Maaten, Ewoud Ter Avest, Heleen Lameijer
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound of the posterior fatpad in elbow fractures.","authors":"Svenja L Haak, Thea van der Veen, Renate Stolmeijer, Annemieke E Boendermaker, Brigitta Britt Ym van der Kolk, Jan C Ter Maaten, Ewoud Ter Avest, Heleen Lameijer","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially be used in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. However, the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS performed by non-radiologists for the exclusion of elbow fractures is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of POCUS of the posterior fatpad performed by non-radiologists in the workup of adult patients presenting with elbow injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre, prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in four EDs to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS to demonstrate or exclude an elbow fracture in patients presenting with elbow injuries to the ED. The study population consisted of a convenience sample. In patients ≥16 years of age with an elbow injury for which an X-ray was ordered, POCUS was performed by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. POCUS (index test) results were compared with X-ray outcomes (reference standard) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 215 patients were included, 143 (67%) of whom had a fracture confirmed on X-ray. POCUS was positive based on a visualised elevated posterior fatpad in 127 (59%) patients. An elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CIs 85% to 95%), a specificity of 93% (95% CI 85% to 98%), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.16) and a positive likelihood ratio of 13.09 (95% CI 5.61 to 30.54) for the presence of an elbow fracture. Post hoc review of the images by expert sonographers improved sensitivity to 96% (95% CI 91% to 99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS of the posterior fatpad is a promising adjunct to physical examination to determine the need for further diagnostic studies in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. Sensitivity after a limited training is high, but not perfect, and can likely further be improved with additional training.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially be used in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. However, the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS performed by non-radiologists for the exclusion of elbow fractures is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of POCUS of the posterior fatpad performed by non-radiologists in the workup of adult patients presenting with elbow injuries.

Methods: A multicentre, prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in four EDs to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS to demonstrate or exclude an elbow fracture in patients presenting with elbow injuries to the ED. The study population consisted of a convenience sample. In patients ≥16 years of age with an elbow injury for which an X-ray was ordered, POCUS was performed by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. POCUS (index test) results were compared with X-ray outcomes (reference standard) to determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS.

Results: A total of 215 patients were included, 143 (67%) of whom had a fracture confirmed on X-ray. POCUS was positive based on a visualised elevated posterior fatpad in 127 (59%) patients. An elevated posterior fatpad on POCUS had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CIs 85% to 95%), a specificity of 93% (95% CI 85% to 98%), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.16) and a positive likelihood ratio of 13.09 (95% CI 5.61 to 30.54) for the presence of an elbow fracture. Post hoc review of the images by expert sonographers improved sensitivity to 96% (95% CI 91% to 99%).

Conclusion: POCUS of the posterior fatpad is a promising adjunct to physical examination to determine the need for further diagnostic studies in the triage of patients with elbow injuries. Sensitivity after a limited training is high, but not perfect, and can likely further be improved with additional training.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信