Performance of the 2023 diagnostic criteria for MOGAD: real-world application in a Chinese multicenter cohort of pediatric and adult patients.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Meng-Ting Cai, Yi Hua, Qi-Lun Lai, Sheng-Yao Su, Chun-Hong Shen, Song Qiao, Yong-Feng Xu, Zhe-Feng Yuan, Yin-Xi Zhang
{"title":"Performance of the 2023 diagnostic criteria for MOGAD: real-world application in a Chinese multicenter cohort of pediatric and adult patients.","authors":"Meng-Ting Cai, Yi Hua, Qi-Lun Lai, Sheng-Yao Su, Chun-Hong Shen, Song Qiao, Yong-Feng Xu, Zhe-Feng Yuan, Yin-Xi Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03875-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical phenotypes of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) have been found to overlap with several other diseases. The new criteria proposed in 2023 were designed to better identify the disease but require validation across various populations to ascertain its clinical utility. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance in phenotypically diverse patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study retrospectively included adult and pediatric patients who were hospitalized for a first suspected demyelinating event and tested positive for MOG immunoglobulin G (IgG) during the acute phase. The 2023 Lancet Neurology criteria were assessed against the benchmark of empirical clinical diagnosis, and the 2018 JAMA Neurology and Journal of Neuroinflammation criteria were also evaluated for comparative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 291 eligible patients (82 adults, 209 children), 282 (96.9%) were clinically diagnosed as definite MOGAD (77 adults, 205 children), while 262 (90.0%) fulfilled the 2023 diagnostic criteria (78 adults, 184 children). A total of 265 patients met the criteria for core clinical demyelinating events, and 76 (26.1%) had serum clear positive MOG-IgG (≥ 1:100). The sensitivity of the 2023 criteria was 0.91 (adults vs. children = 0.97 vs. 0.89), the specificity was 0.56 (adults vs. children = 0.40 vs. 0.75), positive likelihood ratio was 2.06 (adults vs. children = 1.62 vs. 3.57), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.15 (adults vs. children = 0.06 vs. 0.14). Additionally, 264 and 256 cases were classified as definite MOGAD by the 2018 JAMA Neurology and Journal of Neuroinflammation criteria, respectively. Compared to the 2023 diagnostic criteria, the 2018 JAMA Neurology criteria demonstrated similar diagnostic performance. However, the 2018 Journal of Neuroinflammation criteria exhibited comparable sensitivity (0.92, adults vs. children = 0.96 vs. 0.89), higher specificity (1.00, adults vs. children = 1.00 vs. 1.00) and better NLR (0.09, adults vs. children = 0.04 vs. 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2023 criteria demonstrated good sensitivity in adult and pediatric patients in China yet modest specificity. Close follow-up is needed for patients with atypical phenotypes but high-titer MOG-IgG to avoid underdiagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03875-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical phenotypes of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) have been found to overlap with several other diseases. The new criteria proposed in 2023 were designed to better identify the disease but require validation across various populations to ascertain its clinical utility. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance in phenotypically diverse patients.

Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively included adult and pediatric patients who were hospitalized for a first suspected demyelinating event and tested positive for MOG immunoglobulin G (IgG) during the acute phase. The 2023 Lancet Neurology criteria were assessed against the benchmark of empirical clinical diagnosis, and the 2018 JAMA Neurology and Journal of Neuroinflammation criteria were also evaluated for comparative analysis.

Results: Among the 291 eligible patients (82 adults, 209 children), 282 (96.9%) were clinically diagnosed as definite MOGAD (77 adults, 205 children), while 262 (90.0%) fulfilled the 2023 diagnostic criteria (78 adults, 184 children). A total of 265 patients met the criteria for core clinical demyelinating events, and 76 (26.1%) had serum clear positive MOG-IgG (≥ 1:100). The sensitivity of the 2023 criteria was 0.91 (adults vs. children = 0.97 vs. 0.89), the specificity was 0.56 (adults vs. children = 0.40 vs. 0.75), positive likelihood ratio was 2.06 (adults vs. children = 1.62 vs. 3.57), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.15 (adults vs. children = 0.06 vs. 0.14). Additionally, 264 and 256 cases were classified as definite MOGAD by the 2018 JAMA Neurology and Journal of Neuroinflammation criteria, respectively. Compared to the 2023 diagnostic criteria, the 2018 JAMA Neurology criteria demonstrated similar diagnostic performance. However, the 2018 Journal of Neuroinflammation criteria exhibited comparable sensitivity (0.92, adults vs. children = 0.96 vs. 0.89), higher specificity (1.00, adults vs. children = 1.00 vs. 1.00) and better NLR (0.09, adults vs. children = 0.04 vs. 0.11).

Conclusions: The 2023 criteria demonstrated good sensitivity in adult and pediatric patients in China yet modest specificity. Close follow-up is needed for patients with atypical phenotypes but high-titer MOG-IgG to avoid underdiagnosis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信