Applying implementation science frameworks to understand why fisherfolk continue or discontinue pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in Uganda: a qualitative analysis.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Simon Mwima, Laura M Bogart, William Musoke, Semei C Mukama, Stella Allupo, Herbert Kadama, Rose Naigino, Barbara Mukasa, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze
{"title":"Applying implementation science frameworks to understand why fisherfolk continue or discontinue pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in Uganda: a qualitative analysis.","authors":"Simon Mwima, Laura M Bogart, William Musoke, Semei C Mukama, Stella Allupo, Herbert Kadama, Rose Naigino, Barbara Mukasa, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Uganda, fisherfolk have an HIV prevalence between 15% and 40%, significantly higher than the national average of 5.5%. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV but faces challenges in uptake and continuation among fisherfolk. This study explores factors influencing PrEP continuation and discontinuation among fisherfolk in Uganda using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from two fishing communities near Entebbe, Uganda. One community received enhanced PrEP support (adherence support, educational workshops and check-in calls), while the other received standard healthcare outreach. Forty fisherfolk (20 who continued PrEP and 20 who discontinued PrEP) were interviewed 6 months after initiating PrEP. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, with high inter-rater consistency. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings highlighted several determinants of PrEP continuation and discontinuation across the CFIR domains. Intervention characteristics such as side effects and the pill burden were significant barriers, particularly for women who reported nausea and stomach issues. Individual characteristics revealed that perceived HIV risk influenced PrEP use, with women's decisions often influenced by their partners' behaviours and mobility. However, insufficient information and education, especially among women, led to misunderstandings and discontinuation. Inner-setting factors like mobility issues and the distance to healthcare clinics posed significant barriers exacerbated by the geographical isolation of fishing communities. In the outer setting, high HIV prevalence motivated PrEP initiation, but stigma, particularly the misconception that PrEP is an antiretroviral drug used by people living with HIV, led to discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fisherfolk in Uganda encounter multiple barriers to PrEP continuation, with women facing more significant challenges. Enhanced support strategies are essential for improving PrEP adherence and informing future HIV prevention interventions in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In Uganda, fisherfolk have an HIV prevalence between 15% and 40%, significantly higher than the national average of 5.5%. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV but faces challenges in uptake and continuation among fisherfolk. This study explores factors influencing PrEP continuation and discontinuation among fisherfolk in Uganda using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Methods: Participants were recruited from two fishing communities near Entebbe, Uganda. One community received enhanced PrEP support (adherence support, educational workshops and check-in calls), while the other received standard healthcare outreach. Forty fisherfolk (20 who continued PrEP and 20 who discontinued PrEP) were interviewed 6 months after initiating PrEP. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, with high inter-rater consistency. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained.

Results: Findings highlighted several determinants of PrEP continuation and discontinuation across the CFIR domains. Intervention characteristics such as side effects and the pill burden were significant barriers, particularly for women who reported nausea and stomach issues. Individual characteristics revealed that perceived HIV risk influenced PrEP use, with women's decisions often influenced by their partners' behaviours and mobility. However, insufficient information and education, especially among women, led to misunderstandings and discontinuation. Inner-setting factors like mobility issues and the distance to healthcare clinics posed significant barriers exacerbated by the geographical isolation of fishing communities. In the outer setting, high HIV prevalence motivated PrEP initiation, but stigma, particularly the misconception that PrEP is an antiretroviral drug used by people living with HIV, led to discontinuation.

Conclusion: Fisherfolk in Uganda encounter multiple barriers to PrEP continuation, with women facing more significant challenges. Enhanced support strategies are essential for improving PrEP adherence and informing future HIV prevention interventions in high-risk populations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信