Comments on “VCD-FL: Verifiable, Collusion-Resistant, and Dynamic Federated Learning”

IF 8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Zhuoqun Yan;Wenfang Zhang;Xiaomin Wang;Muhammad Khurram Khan
{"title":"Comments on “VCD-FL: Verifiable, Collusion-Resistant, and Dynamic Federated Learning”","authors":"Zhuoqun Yan;Wenfang Zhang;Xiaomin Wang;Muhammad Khurram Khan","doi":"10.1109/TIFS.2025.3533141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gao et al. (2023)recently proposed a collusion-resistant and verifiable federated learning framework named VCD-FL (IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, vol. 18, pp. 3760–3773, 2023). However, in this letter, we show that VCD-FL fails to achieve its claimed security goals. In particular, we demonstrate that their designed commitment scheme, which serves as the core component of the proposed collusion-resistant verification mechanism, is unsafe, and then we present a feasible collusion attack launched by the aggregation server and corrupt clients by leveraging the existing security vulnerabilities.","PeriodicalId":13492,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security","volume":"20 ","pages":"4024-4025"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10851345/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gao et al. (2023)recently proposed a collusion-resistant and verifiable federated learning framework named VCD-FL (IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, vol. 18, pp. 3760–3773, 2023). However, in this letter, we show that VCD-FL fails to achieve its claimed security goals. In particular, we demonstrate that their designed commitment scheme, which serves as the core component of the proposed collusion-resistant verification mechanism, is unsafe, and then we present a feasible collusion attack launched by the aggregation server and corrupt clients by leveraging the existing security vulnerabilities.
对“VCD-FL:可验证、抗共谋和动态联邦学习”的评论
Gao等人(2023)最近提出了一个名为VCD-FL的抗共谋和可验证的联邦学习框架(IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS and SECURITY, vol. 18, pp. 3760-3773, 2023)。然而,在这封信中,我们表明VCD-FL未能实现其声称的安全目标。特别是,我们证明了他们设计的承诺方案是不安全的,作为所提出的抗合谋验证机制的核心组件,然后我们提出了一种可行的合谋攻击,由聚合服务器和破坏客户端利用现有的安全漏洞发起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security covers the sciences, technologies, and applications relating to information forensics, information security, biometrics, surveillance and systems applications that incorporate these features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信