Pre-operative subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adult non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1111/anae.16543
Kyosuke Takahashi, Kyoko Chiba, Ayano Honda, Yusuke Iizuka, Koichi Yoshinaga, Alka Sachin Deo, Tokujiro Uchida
{"title":"Pre-operative subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adult non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Kyosuke Takahashi,&nbsp;Kyoko Chiba,&nbsp;Ayano Honda,&nbsp;Yusuke Iizuka,&nbsp;Koichi Yoshinaga,&nbsp;Alka Sachin Deo,&nbsp;Tokujiro Uchida","doi":"10.1111/anae.16543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Assessment of functional capacity is an essential part of peri-operative risk stratification. Subjective functional capacity is easier to examine than objective tests of patient fitness. However, the association between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes has not been established.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four databases were searched for studies describing the associations between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted among studies where functional capacity was expressed in metabolic equivalents. The primary outcome was postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative overall complications. We estimated the ORs of the outcomes in patients with poor functional capacity (&lt; 4 metabolic equivalents) as compared with those with good functional capacity (≥ 4 metabolic equivalents). Random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 7835 abstracts. After screening and a full-text review, 23 studies were selected. Evaluation methods of functional capacity included: questionnaires (n = 7); specific questions (n = 6); and subjective assessment by anaesthetists (n = 5). The probability of major postoperative adverse cardiovascular events was significantly higher in patients with poor functional capacity (OR 1.84, 95%CI 1.62–2.08) than in those with good functional capacity. Patients with poor functional capacity also had higher odds of mortality (OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.45–4.25) and postoperative complications (OR 1.85, 95%CI 1.34–2.55).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Subjective functional capacity of &lt; 4 metabolic equivalents was associated with postoperative complications including cardiovascular events and other serious outcomes. The results need to be interpreted with caution due to the diverse measures used to assess functional capacity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 5","pages":"561-571"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16543","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Assessment of functional capacity is an essential part of peri-operative risk stratification. Subjective functional capacity is easier to examine than objective tests of patient fitness. However, the association between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes has not been established.

Methods

Four databases were searched for studies describing the associations between subjective functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted among studies where functional capacity was expressed in metabolic equivalents. The primary outcome was postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative overall complications. We estimated the ORs of the outcomes in patients with poor functional capacity (< 4 metabolic equivalents) as compared with those with good functional capacity (≥ 4 metabolic equivalents). Random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis.

Results

We identified 7835 abstracts. After screening and a full-text review, 23 studies were selected. Evaluation methods of functional capacity included: questionnaires (n = 7); specific questions (n = 6); and subjective assessment by anaesthetists (n = 5). The probability of major postoperative adverse cardiovascular events was significantly higher in patients with poor functional capacity (OR 1.84, 95%CI 1.62–2.08) than in those with good functional capacity. Patients with poor functional capacity also had higher odds of mortality (OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.45–4.25) and postoperative complications (OR 1.85, 95%CI 1.34–2.55).

Discussion

Subjective functional capacity of < 4 metabolic equivalents was associated with postoperative complications including cardiovascular events and other serious outcomes. The results need to be interpreted with caution due to the diverse measures used to assess functional capacity.

成人非心脏手术的术前主观功能能力和术后结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析
功能能力评估是围手术期风险分层的重要组成部分。主观的功能能力比客观的病人体能测试更容易检查。然而,主观功能能力与术后预后之间的关系尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信