Unraveling the neuroprotective effect of perampanel and lacosamide combination in the corneal kindling model for epilepsy in mice

Q1 Health Professions
Saba Tehreem, Azka Sabir, Maryam Farooq, Waseem Ashraf, Faleh Alqahtani, Tanveer Ahmad, Imran Imran
{"title":"Unraveling the neuroprotective effect of perampanel and lacosamide combination in the corneal kindling model for epilepsy in mice","authors":"Saba Tehreem,&nbsp;Azka Sabir,&nbsp;Maryam Farooq,&nbsp;Waseem Ashraf,&nbsp;Faleh Alqahtani,&nbsp;Tanveer Ahmad,&nbsp;Imran Imran","doi":"10.1002/ame2.12524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Scientific evidence to guide clinicians on the use of different antiseizure drugs in combination therapy is either very limited or lacking. In this study, the impact of lacosamide and perampanel alone and in combination was tested in corneal kindling model in mice, which is a cost-effective mechanism for screening of antiseizure drugs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The impact of lacosamide (5 mg/kg) and perampanel (0.125 mg/kg) alone and their combination was tested in corneal kindling process (3-mA current for 3 s applied twice daily for consecutive 12 days) in male BALB/c mice. Post-kindling, mice were subjected to a battery of behavioral tests assessing anxiety, memory, and depression-like behaviors. Brain tissues were then harvested for analysis of oxidative stress biomarkers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our results showed that the combination therapy of lacosamide and perampanel was more effective in reducing seizure progression than monotherapy of these drugs. Animals treated with combination therapy showed significant behavioral improvements, as reduced anxiety and depression were noticed, and their cognitive abilities were notably better compared to animals of all other groups. Moreover, biochemical assays of isolated brains from combination-treated group revealed lesser amount of oxidative stress. In addition, outcomes of dual regime were comparable to the phenytoin in seizure control but showed superior benefits in mitigation of kindling-prompted behavioral dysfunction and oxidative stress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggests that the lacosamide and perampanel combination therapy worked noticeably better in halting the corneal kindling process in mice and improved the epilepsy-associated psychiatric disorders that might be due to antioxidant effects of both drugs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93869,"journal":{"name":"Animal models and experimental medicine","volume":"8 2","pages":"222-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ame2.12524","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal models and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ame2.12524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Scientific evidence to guide clinicians on the use of different antiseizure drugs in combination therapy is either very limited or lacking. In this study, the impact of lacosamide and perampanel alone and in combination was tested in corneal kindling model in mice, which is a cost-effective mechanism for screening of antiseizure drugs.

Methods

The impact of lacosamide (5 mg/kg) and perampanel (0.125 mg/kg) alone and their combination was tested in corneal kindling process (3-mA current for 3 s applied twice daily for consecutive 12 days) in male BALB/c mice. Post-kindling, mice were subjected to a battery of behavioral tests assessing anxiety, memory, and depression-like behaviors. Brain tissues were then harvested for analysis of oxidative stress biomarkers.

Results

Our results showed that the combination therapy of lacosamide and perampanel was more effective in reducing seizure progression than monotherapy of these drugs. Animals treated with combination therapy showed significant behavioral improvements, as reduced anxiety and depression were noticed, and their cognitive abilities were notably better compared to animals of all other groups. Moreover, biochemical assays of isolated brains from combination-treated group revealed lesser amount of oxidative stress. In addition, outcomes of dual regime were comparable to the phenytoin in seizure control but showed superior benefits in mitigation of kindling-prompted behavioral dysfunction and oxidative stress.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the lacosamide and perampanel combination therapy worked noticeably better in halting the corneal kindling process in mice and improved the epilepsy-associated psychiatric disorders that might be due to antioxidant effects of both drugs.

Abstract Image

perampanel联合lacosamide对小鼠癫痫角膜点燃模型的神经保护作用。
背景:指导临床医生在联合治疗中使用不同抗癫痫药物的科学证据要么非常有限,要么缺乏。在本研究中,我们在小鼠角膜点燃模型中测试了拉科沙胺和perampanel单独和联合使用的影响,这是一种具有成本效益的抗癫痫药物筛选机制。方法:观察拉科沙胺(5 mg/kg)和perampanel (0.125 mg/kg)单独及联合用药对雄性BALB/c小鼠角膜点火过程(3 ma电流,3 s,每日2次,连续12 d)的影响。点燃后,小鼠接受了一系列行为测试,评估焦虑、记忆和抑郁样行为。然后采集脑组织用于分析氧化应激生物标志物。结果:我们的研究结果表明,拉科沙胺和perampanel联合治疗在减少癫痫发作进展方面比这些药物单独治疗更有效。接受联合治疗的动物表现出显著的行为改善,焦虑和抑郁情绪有所减少,与所有其他组的动物相比,它们的认知能力明显更好。此外,联合治疗组的离体脑生化分析显示氧化应激水平较低。此外,双重方案在癫痫发作控制方面的结果与苯妥英相当,但在减轻点火引起的行为功能障碍和氧化应激方面表现出更大的益处。结论:本研究表明,拉科沙胺和perampanel联合治疗在阻止小鼠角膜点燃过程和改善癫痫相关精神疾病方面效果明显更好,这可能是由于两种药物的抗氧化作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信