Exploring the barriers and enablers to the standardized and routine use of patient-rated outcomes for clients presenting with hand injuries at an Australian public hospital.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Laura Cowling, Dave Parsons, Cleo Bigwood, Sally Foster, Andrea Pinto, Yu Xuan Kong
{"title":"Exploring the barriers and enablers to the standardized and routine use of patient-rated outcomes for clients presenting with hand injuries at an Australian public hospital.","authors":"Laura Cowling, Dave Parsons, Cleo Bigwood, Sally Foster, Andrea Pinto, Yu Xuan Kong","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utilization of standardized patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) by hand therapists is essential to evaluate treatment and clinical outcomes and underpins evidence-based and patient-centered practice. However, research indicates that the routine use of PROMs is inconsistent in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the barriers and enablers experienced by hand therapists in the routine use of standardized and valid PROMs. Additionally, it aimed to describe appropriate strategies, based on the barriers and enablers identified, to improve the administration of PROMs in hand therapy practice.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were used to explore the experiences of hand therapists in routinely using PROMs in clinical practice at two Australian tertiary public hospital hand clinics. Qualitative data were analyzed for themes using reflexive thematic analysis described by Braun and Clarke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants were interviewed. Interview findings generated three core themes-Culture is King, It's All Too Hard and When I do it, I value it. The core themes-Culture is King and It's All Too Hard reflected the cultural and institutional factors that present as barriers to the routine uptake of standardized PROMs, such as lack of infrastructure to support data collection and a lack of knowledge of PROMs. The third core theme, \"When I do it, I value it\" reflects the value and importance of completing PROMs to facilitate evidence-based practice and benefits in tracking treatment progress and providing feedback regarding their progression. Suggested strategies for addressing barriers included using appropriate and standardized methods of collecting and storing PROM data, improving accessibility to PROMs in clinical practice and forming peer education groups and training opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hand therapists identify the value and importance of completing PROMs in daily practice; however, culture in the workplace and organizational infrastructure adversely influence the routine use of standardized PROMs by hand therapists.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.08.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The utilization of standardized patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) by hand therapists is essential to evaluate treatment and clinical outcomes and underpins evidence-based and patient-centered practice. However, research indicates that the routine use of PROMs is inconsistent in clinical practice.

Purpose: To explore the barriers and enablers experienced by hand therapists in the routine use of standardized and valid PROMs. Additionally, it aimed to describe appropriate strategies, based on the barriers and enablers identified, to improve the administration of PROMs in hand therapy practice.

Study design: Qualitative.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were used to explore the experiences of hand therapists in routinely using PROMs in clinical practice at two Australian tertiary public hospital hand clinics. Qualitative data were analyzed for themes using reflexive thematic analysis described by Braun and Clarke.

Results: Ten participants were interviewed. Interview findings generated three core themes-Culture is King, It's All Too Hard and When I do it, I value it. The core themes-Culture is King and It's All Too Hard reflected the cultural and institutional factors that present as barriers to the routine uptake of standardized PROMs, such as lack of infrastructure to support data collection and a lack of knowledge of PROMs. The third core theme, "When I do it, I value it" reflects the value and importance of completing PROMs to facilitate evidence-based practice and benefits in tracking treatment progress and providing feedback regarding their progression. Suggested strategies for addressing barriers included using appropriate and standardized methods of collecting and storing PROM data, improving accessibility to PROMs in clinical practice and forming peer education groups and training opportunities.

Conclusions: Hand therapists identify the value and importance of completing PROMs in daily practice; however, culture in the workplace and organizational infrastructure adversely influence the routine use of standardized PROMs by hand therapists.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信