Classifying Race in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Potential Disparities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jenny Shin, Jennifer Liu, Megin Parayil, Catherine R Counts, Christopher J Drucker, Jason Coult, Jennifer Blackwood, Sally Guan, Peter J Kudenchuk, Michael R Sayre, Thomas Rea
{"title":"Classifying Race in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Potential Disparities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jenny Shin, Jennifer Liu, Megin Parayil, Catherine R Counts, Christopher J Drucker, Jason Coult, Jennifer Blackwood, Sally Guan, Peter J Kudenchuk, Michael R Sayre, Thomas Rea","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although racial disparities have been described in resuscitation, little is known about potential bias in race classification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults treated by emergency medical services (EMS) for nontraumatic OHCA in King County, WA between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. We assessed agreement using κ and evaluated patterns of missingness between EMS-assessed race versus comprehensive race classification from hospital and death records. Using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for Utstein data elements, we analyzed the association between race and OHCA survival across different sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5909 eligible OHCA patients, the average age was 64.0 years, 35.4% were female, and 16.1% survived to hospital discharge. Based on comprehensive race classification, 68.7% were White, 12.8% Black, 12.1% Asian, 2.5% multiracial, 2.3% Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, and 1.6% American Indian/Alaska Native. EMS did not classify race in 43.7%. The κ coefficient between EMS and comprehensive race classification was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90), though agreement varied substantially by specific race and was lowest among American Indian/Alaska Native (39.5%). Missingness in EMS records varied according to race and was greater among those classified as American Indian/Alaska Native (60.8%), Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (58.8%), Asian (57.8%), or multiracial (54.1%) compared with White (40.6%) or Black (40.4%). In multivariable models using EMS-classified race, the odds ratio (OR) of survival was not significantly different for any race group compared with the White race, that is, OR. However, when using comprehensive race classification, OR of survival was significantly lower among Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.97]) and among multiracial (OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.75]) compared with White race.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adult OHCA, race misclassification and missingness influenced its association with survival. Efforts should continue to evaluate best practices to classify race correctly and comprehensively.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e011446"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although racial disparities have been described in resuscitation, little is known about potential bias in race classification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults treated by emergency medical services (EMS) for nontraumatic OHCA in King County, WA between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. We assessed agreement using κ and evaluated patterns of missingness between EMS-assessed race versus comprehensive race classification from hospital and death records. Using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for Utstein data elements, we analyzed the association between race and OHCA survival across different sources.

Results: Among 5909 eligible OHCA patients, the average age was 64.0 years, 35.4% were female, and 16.1% survived to hospital discharge. Based on comprehensive race classification, 68.7% were White, 12.8% Black, 12.1% Asian, 2.5% multiracial, 2.3% Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, and 1.6% American Indian/Alaska Native. EMS did not classify race in 43.7%. The κ coefficient between EMS and comprehensive race classification was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90), though agreement varied substantially by specific race and was lowest among American Indian/Alaska Native (39.5%). Missingness in EMS records varied according to race and was greater among those classified as American Indian/Alaska Native (60.8%), Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (58.8%), Asian (57.8%), or multiracial (54.1%) compared with White (40.6%) or Black (40.4%). In multivariable models using EMS-classified race, the odds ratio (OR) of survival was not significantly different for any race group compared with the White race, that is, OR. However, when using comprehensive race classification, OR of survival was significantly lower among Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.97]) and among multiracial (OR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20-0.75]) compared with White race.

Conclusions: In adult OHCA, race misclassification and missingness influenced its association with survival. Efforts should continue to evaluate best practices to classify race correctly and comprehensively.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信