Lucerne milestone approach for benchmarking and education: Towards ultra-low dose endovascular aortic repair.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Maani Hakimi, Alina Reeg, Juan Antonio Celi de la Torre, Georg Jung, Tomàs Reyes Del Castillo, Justus Roos, Thiago Lima
{"title":"Lucerne milestone approach for benchmarking and education: Towards ultra-low dose endovascular aortic repair.","authors":"Maani Hakimi, Alina Reeg, Juan Antonio Celi de la Torre, Georg Jung, Tomàs Reyes Del Castillo, Justus Roos, Thiago Lima","doi":"10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this single-center case series is to demonstrate that an ultra-low dose (ULD) can be routinely achieved in the hybrid operating room in standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm by adjusting the manufacturer's predefined imaging parameters, hardware configurations and user protocols (including benchmarking).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The hybrid operating room manufacturer predefined EVAR software setup of the dose exposure control software (OPTIQ, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) at our university medical center was screened for possible improvements regarding radiation dose application. Tests on a water-equivalent as well as polymethyl methacrylate phantom model to assess the impact of technical settings were performed, including comparison of settings for exposure control software, different magnification, collimation configurations and detector distance. All results were transferred into modified setups for the exposure control software and a new ULD procedure protocol for EVAR. Additionally, to standardize the clinical pathway, the Lucerne EVAR Milestone Approach (LEMA) was introduced including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative milestones for technical procedure content and dose benchmarking during EVAR. A validation of the new settings including revised software setup, procedure protocol, and applicability of LEMA on a consecutive EVAR case series was conducted. Ten consecutive patients undergoing EVAR for low and medium complexity infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were included. The primary outcome parameter was intraoperative dose area product (DAP, measured in Gy·cm<sup>2</sup>). Secondary outcomes were median fluoroscopy time (in minutes:seconds), cumulative air kerma (in mGy), clinical success, and occurrence of endoleaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>New ULD settings compared with previous manufacturers standard settings of dose exposure control software reduced DAP for both fluoroscopy (0.0382 Gy·cm<sup>2</sup>/min vs 0.3 Gy·cm<sup>2</sup>/min) and angiography (2.36 Gy·cm<sup>2</sup>/min vs 2.48 Gy·cm<sup>2</sup>/min). Digital magnification and collimation decreased DAP. Application of the new ULD standard EVAR protocol resulted in a median DAP of 5.6 Gy·cm<sup>2</sup> (range, 3.54-12.1 Gy·cm<sup>2</sup>). Median fluoroscopy time was 16 minutes and 32 seconds. Type I endoleaks occurred in no patients (0%), type II in five patients (50%), and type III in no patients (0%). No patient had to undergo reintervention owing to endoleak or absence of diameter shrinkage during the first postoperative year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revision of the manufacturer-predefined EVAR setup by testing and ensuring optimal imaging parameters and hardware configurations in combination with LEMA enabled performance of ULD standard EVAR procedures routinely without compromising imaging quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":45071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases Innovations and Techniques","volume":"11 2","pages":"101705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases Innovations and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this single-center case series is to demonstrate that an ultra-low dose (ULD) can be routinely achieved in the hybrid operating room in standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm by adjusting the manufacturer's predefined imaging parameters, hardware configurations and user protocols (including benchmarking).

Methods: The hybrid operating room manufacturer predefined EVAR software setup of the dose exposure control software (OPTIQ, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) at our university medical center was screened for possible improvements regarding radiation dose application. Tests on a water-equivalent as well as polymethyl methacrylate phantom model to assess the impact of technical settings were performed, including comparison of settings for exposure control software, different magnification, collimation configurations and detector distance. All results were transferred into modified setups for the exposure control software and a new ULD procedure protocol for EVAR. Additionally, to standardize the clinical pathway, the Lucerne EVAR Milestone Approach (LEMA) was introduced including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative milestones for technical procedure content and dose benchmarking during EVAR. A validation of the new settings including revised software setup, procedure protocol, and applicability of LEMA on a consecutive EVAR case series was conducted. Ten consecutive patients undergoing EVAR for low and medium complexity infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were included. The primary outcome parameter was intraoperative dose area product (DAP, measured in Gy·cm2). Secondary outcomes were median fluoroscopy time (in minutes:seconds), cumulative air kerma (in mGy), clinical success, and occurrence of endoleaks.

Results: New ULD settings compared with previous manufacturers standard settings of dose exposure control software reduced DAP for both fluoroscopy (0.0382 Gy·cm2/min vs 0.3 Gy·cm2/min) and angiography (2.36 Gy·cm2/min vs 2.48 Gy·cm2/min). Digital magnification and collimation decreased DAP. Application of the new ULD standard EVAR protocol resulted in a median DAP of 5.6 Gy·cm2 (range, 3.54-12.1 Gy·cm2). Median fluoroscopy time was 16 minutes and 32 seconds. Type I endoleaks occurred in no patients (0%), type II in five patients (50%), and type III in no patients (0%). No patient had to undergo reintervention owing to endoleak or absence of diameter shrinkage during the first postoperative year.

Conclusions: Revision of the manufacturer-predefined EVAR setup by testing and ensuring optimal imaging parameters and hardware configurations in combination with LEMA enabled performance of ULD standard EVAR procedures routinely without compromising imaging quality.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques is a surgical journal dedicated to publishing peer review high quality case reports, vascular images and innovative techniques related to all aspects of arterial, venous, and lymphatic diseases and disorders, including vascular trauma, malformations, wound care and the placement and maintenance of arterio-venous dialysis accesses with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The Journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals involved with the management of patients with the entire spectrum of vascular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信