Staff and service user perspectives of a co-located homelessness centre in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198
Lauren Ng, Eddie Donaghy, John Conway, Stewart W Mercer
{"title":"Staff and service user perspectives of a co-located homelessness centre in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.","authors":"Lauren Ng, Eddie Donaghy, John Conway, Stewart W Mercer","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-location and integration of services within a psychologically-informed environment is recommended for people experiencing homeless but there are few examples of this in the UK. Such a centre opened in Scotland in November 2021.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate progress of the new centre.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Mixed-methods pre-post-test design before (baseline) and two years after (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Baseline and follow-up staff surveys measured knowledge of trauma-informed care, well-being, team climate, and job satisfaction. The follow-up staff survey also evaluated staff support and service improvements. In-depth staff interviews were conducted at baseline (<i>n</i>=25) and follow-up and analysed thematically. A service users survey was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The staff survey showed significant improvements between baseline and follow-up in trauma-informed care, burnout, and team climate, together with improvements in support, service integration, and service user care. Service users reported high satisfaction with the new centre.Staff interviews identified a more psychologically-informed environment, better staff support, and improved opportunistic multidisciplinary working over the two years of the centre opening. However, a number of barriers were also identified relating to the building and the IT systems. Further work on the centre's vision; short- and long-term integration plans; workload, and sustainability were felt to be needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-location of services for people experiencing homelessness in Scotland has led to improvements in staff burn-out and team climate, and service users' satisfaction over the first two years of opening. However, barriers remain and full integration requires a clearer vision and 'road map', requiring collaborative leadership and sustainable funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Co-location and integration of services within a psychologically-informed environment is recommended for people experiencing homeless but there are few examples of this in the UK. Such a centre opened in Scotland in November 2021.

Aim: To evaluate progress of the new centre.

Design & setting: Mixed-methods pre-post-test design before (baseline) and two years after (follow-up).

Method: Baseline and follow-up staff surveys measured knowledge of trauma-informed care, well-being, team climate, and job satisfaction. The follow-up staff survey also evaluated staff support and service improvements. In-depth staff interviews were conducted at baseline (n=25) and follow-up and analysed thematically. A service users survey was also conducted.

Results: The staff survey showed significant improvements between baseline and follow-up in trauma-informed care, burnout, and team climate, together with improvements in support, service integration, and service user care. Service users reported high satisfaction with the new centre.Staff interviews identified a more psychologically-informed environment, better staff support, and improved opportunistic multidisciplinary working over the two years of the centre opening. However, a number of barriers were also identified relating to the building and the IT systems. Further work on the centre's vision; short- and long-term integration plans; workload, and sustainability were felt to be needed.

Conclusion: Co-location of services for people experiencing homelessness in Scotland has led to improvements in staff burn-out and team climate, and service users' satisfaction over the first two years of opening. However, barriers remain and full integration requires a clearer vision and 'road map', requiring collaborative leadership and sustainable funding.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信