Assessing and Enhancing Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments in Early Childhood Education and Care Centers: Scoping Review of eHealth Tools.

IF 2.1 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Joyce Hayek, Kelsi Dickson, Lynne M Z Lafave
{"title":"Assessing and Enhancing Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments in Early Childhood Education and Care Centers: Scoping Review of eHealth Tools.","authors":"Joyce Hayek, Kelsi Dickson, Lynne M Z Lafave","doi":"10.2196/68372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early childhood is a critical period for shaping lifelong health behaviors, making early childhood education and care (ECEC) environments ideal for implementing nutrition and physical activity interventions. eHealth tools are increasingly utilized in ECEC settings due to their accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, demonstrating promise in enhancing educators' practices. Despite the potential effectiveness of these eHealth approaches, a comprehensive collection of available evidence on eHealth tools designed to assess or support best practices for nutrition or physical activity in ECECs is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this scoping review is to map the range of available eHealth tools designed to assess or deliver interventions aimed at improving nutrition or physical activity in ECEC settings, while evaluating their components, theoretical foundations, and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The objectives, inclusion criteria, and methods for this review were predefined and specified. Eligibility criteria were (1) early childhood educators (population); (2) eHealth (digital) technologies, such as websites, smartphone apps, emails, and social media; and (3) tools designed to assess or deliver interventions aimed at improving best practices for nutrition, physical activity, or both within ECEC settings (context). A search was conducted across 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, and Embase) to identify white literature, and 3 electronic databases (ProQuest, Google Scholar, and targeted Google search), along with hand-searching of reference lists, were used to identify gray literature. All literature was reported in English or French, with the search extending until May 2024. Separate data charting tools were used for white and gray literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy identified 3064 results for white literature, yielding 2653 unique citations after duplicates were removed. Full texts for 65 citations were retrieved and screened for inclusion, resulting in 30 studies eligible for data extraction and analysis. The most common study design was a randomized controlled trial, comprising 16 studies (53%). The largest proportion of studies were conducted in the United States (11 studies, 37%). In total, 19 eHealth tools were identified, targeting nutrition (8 tools, 42%), physical activity (5 tools, 26%), or both nutrition and physical activity (6 tools, 32%). All tools were web based (19 tools, 100%). The gray literature search yielded 1054 results, of which 17 were moved to full-text screening, and 7 met the eligibility criteria for data extraction and analysis. The tools identified in the gray literature originated in Canada (4 tools, 57%) and the United States (3 tools, 43%). The majority targeted nutrition (4 tools, 57%) and were primarily web based (6 tools, 86%), with 1 mobile app (1 tool, 14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review mapped the available eHealth tools designed to improve nutrition or physical activity environments in ECEC settings, highlighting the growing emphasis on web-based tools and the need for psychometric testing. Future research should systematically evaluate the effectiveness of these tools, particularly those addressing both nutrition and physical activity, to identify the key factors that contribute to long-term behavior change.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Open Science Framework XTRNZ; https://osf.io/xtrnz.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.2196/52252.</p>","PeriodicalId":36223,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","volume":"8 ","pages":"e68372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early childhood is a critical period for shaping lifelong health behaviors, making early childhood education and care (ECEC) environments ideal for implementing nutrition and physical activity interventions. eHealth tools are increasingly utilized in ECEC settings due to their accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, demonstrating promise in enhancing educators' practices. Despite the potential effectiveness of these eHealth approaches, a comprehensive collection of available evidence on eHealth tools designed to assess or support best practices for nutrition or physical activity in ECECs is currently lacking.

Objective: The primary objective of this scoping review is to map the range of available eHealth tools designed to assess or deliver interventions aimed at improving nutrition or physical activity in ECEC settings, while evaluating their components, theoretical foundations, and effectiveness.

Methods: This scoping review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The objectives, inclusion criteria, and methods for this review were predefined and specified. Eligibility criteria were (1) early childhood educators (population); (2) eHealth (digital) technologies, such as websites, smartphone apps, emails, and social media; and (3) tools designed to assess or deliver interventions aimed at improving best practices for nutrition, physical activity, or both within ECEC settings (context). A search was conducted across 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, and Embase) to identify white literature, and 3 electronic databases (ProQuest, Google Scholar, and targeted Google search), along with hand-searching of reference lists, were used to identify gray literature. All literature was reported in English or French, with the search extending until May 2024. Separate data charting tools were used for white and gray literature.

Results: The search strategy identified 3064 results for white literature, yielding 2653 unique citations after duplicates were removed. Full texts for 65 citations were retrieved and screened for inclusion, resulting in 30 studies eligible for data extraction and analysis. The most common study design was a randomized controlled trial, comprising 16 studies (53%). The largest proportion of studies were conducted in the United States (11 studies, 37%). In total, 19 eHealth tools were identified, targeting nutrition (8 tools, 42%), physical activity (5 tools, 26%), or both nutrition and physical activity (6 tools, 32%). All tools were web based (19 tools, 100%). The gray literature search yielded 1054 results, of which 17 were moved to full-text screening, and 7 met the eligibility criteria for data extraction and analysis. The tools identified in the gray literature originated in Canada (4 tools, 57%) and the United States (3 tools, 43%). The majority targeted nutrition (4 tools, 57%) and were primarily web based (6 tools, 86%), with 1 mobile app (1 tool, 14%).

Conclusions: This scoping review mapped the available eHealth tools designed to improve nutrition or physical activity environments in ECEC settings, highlighting the growing emphasis on web-based tools and the need for psychometric testing. Future research should systematically evaluate the effectiveness of these tools, particularly those addressing both nutrition and physical activity, to identify the key factors that contribute to long-term behavior change.

Trial registration: Open Science Framework XTRNZ; https://osf.io/xtrnz.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/52252.

评估和加强幼儿教育和护理中心的营养和体育活动环境:电子卫生工具的范围审查。
背景:幼儿期是塑造终身健康行为的关键时期,幼儿教育和护理(ECEC)环境是实施营养和身体活动干预的理想环境。电子健康工具由于其可访问性、可扩展性和成本效益,越来越多地在ECEC环境中使用,这表明了在加强教育工作者实践方面的承诺。尽管这些电子卫生方法具有潜在的有效性,但目前缺乏旨在评估或支持ecec中营养或身体活动最佳实践的电子卫生工具的现有证据的全面收集。目的:本范围综述的主要目的是绘制可用电子健康工具的范围,这些工具旨在评估或提供旨在改善ECEC环境中营养或身体活动的干预措施,同时评估其组成部分、理论基础和有效性。方法:本综述遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法,按照PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目)清单进行。本综述的目的、纳入标准和方法是预先确定和规定的。入选标准为:(1)幼儿教育工作者(人群);(2)电子健康(数字)技术,如网站、智能手机应用、电子邮件和社交媒体;(3)旨在评估或提供干预措施的工具,旨在改善ECEC环境(背景)中营养、身体活动或两者的最佳实践。在5个电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL Plus、ERIC和Embase)中进行检索以识别白色文献,在3个电子数据库(ProQuest、谷歌Scholar和targeted谷歌search)中进行检索,并使用参考文献列表手工检索来识别灰色文献。所有文献均以英语或法语报道,检索时间延长至2024年5月。白色文献和灰色文献分别使用不同的数据图表工具。结果:搜索策略确定了白人文献的3064个结果,在删除重复后产生2653个唯一引用。检索并筛选了65篇引文的全文,纳入了30篇符合数据提取和分析条件的研究。最常见的研究设计是随机对照试验,包括16项研究(53%)。在美国进行的研究比例最大(11项研究,37%)。总共确定了19个eHealth工具,针对营养(8个工具,42%)、身体活动(5个工具,26%)或营养和身体活动(6个工具,32%)。所有工具都是基于web的(19个工具,100%)。灰色文献检索共产生1054条结果,其中17条进入全文筛选,7条符合数据提取和分析的资格标准。灰色文献中确定的工具起源于加拿大(4种工具,57%)和美国(3种工具,43%)。大多数以营养为目标(4个工具,57%),主要基于网络(6个工具,86%),1个移动应用程序(1个工具,14%)。结论:这一范围综述绘制了旨在改善ECEC环境中营养或身体活动环境的可用电子健康工具,强调了对基于网络的工具的日益重视和对心理测量测试的需求。未来的研究应该系统地评估这些工具的有效性,特别是那些解决营养和身体活动的工具,以确定有助于长期行为改变的关键因素。试验注册:开放科学框架XTRNZ;https://osf.io/xtrnz.International注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-10.2196/52252。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信