Stressors contributing to burnout among acute care and trauma surgery care teams: a systems-analysis approach.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-01-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001377
Elizabeth Kwong, Karthik Adapa, Viola Goodacre, Lisa Vizer, Jin Ra, Caprice Greenberg, Thomas Ivester, Nadia Charguia, Lawrence B Marks, Lukasz Mazur
{"title":"Stressors contributing to burnout among acute care and trauma surgery care teams: a systems-analysis approach.","authors":"Elizabeth Kwong, Karthik Adapa, Viola Goodacre, Lisa Vizer, Jin Ra, Caprice Greenberg, Thomas Ivester, Nadia Charguia, Lawrence B Marks, Lukasz Mazur","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout negatively impacts healthcare professionals' well-being, leading to an increased risk of human errors and patient harm. There are limited assessments of burnout and associated stressors among acute care and trauma surgery teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Acute care and trauma surgery team members at a US academic medical center were administered a survey that included a 2-item Maslach Burnout Inventory and 21 workplace stressors based on the National Academy of Medicine's systems model of clinician burnout and professional well-being. Stressors were summarized and presented to participants in focus groups. Contextual inquiries (CIs) were conducted to gather additional information about key stressors. Qualitative data were used to generate an affinity model, which participants then validated and used to prioritize top stressors. Participants rated stressors by level of impact and level of effort, and improvement recommendations were made based on these results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74% (n=14/19) acute care and trauma surgery team members reported high burnout. Key stressors included inadequate staffing, organizational culture, excessive workload, and inefficient workflows. Attending faculty (surgeons) classified the following key priorities for improvement: (i) improve throughput and patient flow, (ii) provide better information technology support, and (iii) improve rewards and support. Non-faculty (advanced practice providers (APPs), nurses, staff) classified the following for improvement: (i) align APP job responsibilities, (ii) improve lack of recognition from leadership, and (iii) robust and consistent APP training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A contextual design approach to studying burnout using surveys, focus groups, CIs, modeling, and validation and prioritization is a feasible method for identifying key stressors and improvements that may enable more impactful and appropriately targeted interventions. Results indicate high levels of burnout among acute care and trauma surgery team members, requiring prioritized attention to operational and relationship issues necessary to care for patients. Efforts to improve surgery teams' workflows, auxiliary support, compensation, and relationships with leadership may address burnout.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"e001377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout negatively impacts healthcare professionals' well-being, leading to an increased risk of human errors and patient harm. There are limited assessments of burnout and associated stressors among acute care and trauma surgery teams.

Methods: Acute care and trauma surgery team members at a US academic medical center were administered a survey that included a 2-item Maslach Burnout Inventory and 21 workplace stressors based on the National Academy of Medicine's systems model of clinician burnout and professional well-being. Stressors were summarized and presented to participants in focus groups. Contextual inquiries (CIs) were conducted to gather additional information about key stressors. Qualitative data were used to generate an affinity model, which participants then validated and used to prioritize top stressors. Participants rated stressors by level of impact and level of effort, and improvement recommendations were made based on these results.

Results: 74% (n=14/19) acute care and trauma surgery team members reported high burnout. Key stressors included inadequate staffing, organizational culture, excessive workload, and inefficient workflows. Attending faculty (surgeons) classified the following key priorities for improvement: (i) improve throughput and patient flow, (ii) provide better information technology support, and (iii) improve rewards and support. Non-faculty (advanced practice providers (APPs), nurses, staff) classified the following for improvement: (i) align APP job responsibilities, (ii) improve lack of recognition from leadership, and (iii) robust and consistent APP training.

Conclusions: A contextual design approach to studying burnout using surveys, focus groups, CIs, modeling, and validation and prioritization is a feasible method for identifying key stressors and improvements that may enable more impactful and appropriately targeted interventions. Results indicate high levels of burnout among acute care and trauma surgery team members, requiring prioritized attention to operational and relationship issues necessary to care for patients. Efforts to improve surgery teams' workflows, auxiliary support, compensation, and relationships with leadership may address burnout.

Level of evidence: Level V.

压力源对急性护理和创伤外科护理团队中职业倦怠的影响:系统分析方法。
背景:职业倦怠对医疗保健专业人员的健康产生负面影响,导致人为错误和患者伤害的风险增加。在急症护理和创伤外科团队中,对倦怠和相关压力源的评估有限。方法:对美国一家学术医疗中心的急症护理和创伤外科团队成员进行了一项调查,该调查包括2项马斯拉克职业倦怠量表和21项工作压力源,该调查基于美国国家医学院的临床医生职业倦怠和职业幸福感系统模型。压力源被总结并呈现给焦点小组的参与者。进行上下文询问(ci)以收集有关关键压力源的附加信息。定性数据用于生成亲和模型,然后参与者验证并使用该模型优先考虑最重要的压力源。参与者根据影响程度和努力程度对压力源进行评级,并根据这些结果提出改进建议。结果:74% (n=14/19)的急症护理和创伤外科团队成员报告高度倦怠。主要的压力源包括人员配备不足、组织文化、工作量过大和工作流程效率低下。主治医师(外科医生)将以下关键优先事项分类为改进:(i)改善吞吐量和患者流量,(ii)提供更好的信息技术支持,以及(iii)改善奖励和支持。非教师(高级实践提供者(APP),护士,员工)将以下方面分类为改进:(i)调整APP工作职责,(ii)改善领导层缺乏认可的情况,以及(iii)稳健和一致的APP培训。结论:使用调查、焦点小组、ci、建模、验证和优先级排序等方法来研究倦怠是一种可行的方法,可以识别关键压力源并进行改进,从而实现更有效和更有针对性的干预。结果表明,急性护理和创伤外科团队成员的倦怠程度很高,需要优先关注护理患者所需的操作和关系问题。努力改善外科团队的工作流程、辅助支持、补偿以及与领导的关系可能会解决倦怠问题。证据等级:V级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信