Sorabh Singhal, Elizabeth Mause, Maria Esteli Garcia, Marie St Pierre, Lisa Ochoa-Frongia, Allison Gail Dempsey
{"title":"Quality of Psychiatric Care for Immigrants and People With a Non-English Language Preference: A Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Sorabh Singhal, Elizabeth Mause, Maria Esteli Garcia, Marie St Pierre, Lisa Ochoa-Frongia, Allison Gail Dempsey","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Immigrants and persons with a non-English language preference (NELP) face unique challenges in the mental health care system. This systematic scoping review aimed to evaluate the literature for disparities in psychiatric care delivery, beyond access and utilization barriers, experienced by these two populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors queried four databases: PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Studies published between August 1993 and August 2023 were selected if they had a population that included immigrants to English-language countries or patients with a NELP and a mental illness, had a relevant comparison group, and included outcome measures focused on quality of psychiatric care delivery. Studies focusing solely on care access or utilization, studies without original data, case reports, and commentaries were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 2,860 studies. Seventeen studies were included for full-text review (Cohen's κ<b>=</b>0.96). Large variability was found in the measures of quality used in the studies. Outcome variables were involuntary treatment rate, symptom management, unmet needs, medication use and monitoring, diagnosis, and psychiatric referral. Immigrants were more likely than nonimmigrants to receive involuntary treatments in all seven pertinent studies. An insufficient number of studies focused on other outcome measures, limiting analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many studies highlighted differences in care, especially with regard to involuntary hospitalization. Outcome measures varied and deviated from established quality metrics. Insufficient data were available to determine whether the identified differences in care represent a care delivery gap. Studies that use standardized measures would assist in evaluating the quality of care received by immigrants and patients with a NELP.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"381-392"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Immigrants and persons with a non-English language preference (NELP) face unique challenges in the mental health care system. This systematic scoping review aimed to evaluate the literature for disparities in psychiatric care delivery, beyond access and utilization barriers, experienced by these two populations.
Methods: The authors queried four databases: PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Studies published between August 1993 and August 2023 were selected if they had a population that included immigrants to English-language countries or patients with a NELP and a mental illness, had a relevant comparison group, and included outcome measures focused on quality of psychiatric care delivery. Studies focusing solely on care access or utilization, studies without original data, case reports, and commentaries were excluded.
Results: The search identified 2,860 studies. Seventeen studies were included for full-text review (Cohen's κ=0.96). Large variability was found in the measures of quality used in the studies. Outcome variables were involuntary treatment rate, symptom management, unmet needs, medication use and monitoring, diagnosis, and psychiatric referral. Immigrants were more likely than nonimmigrants to receive involuntary treatments in all seven pertinent studies. An insufficient number of studies focused on other outcome measures, limiting analyses.
Conclusions: Many studies highlighted differences in care, especially with regard to involuntary hospitalization. Outcome measures varied and deviated from established quality metrics. Insufficient data were available to determine whether the identified differences in care represent a care delivery gap. Studies that use standardized measures would assist in evaluating the quality of care received by immigrants and patients with a NELP.
目的:移民和非英语语言偏好者(NELP)在精神卫生保健系统中面临独特的挑战。本系统的范围综述旨在评估这两个人群在获得和利用障碍之外精神科护理提供方面的差异文献。方法:对PubMed、PsycInfo、Web of Science、CINAHL四个数据库进行查询。在1993年8月至2023年8月之间发表的研究,如果他们的人口包括英语国家的移民或患有NELP和精神疾病的患者,有相关的对照组,并包括关注精神病学护理质量的结果测量,则选择这些研究。仅关注护理获取或利用的研究、没有原始数据、病例报告和评论的研究被排除在外。结果:搜索确定了2860项研究。17项研究纳入全文综述(Cohen’s κ=0.96)。在研究中使用的质量测量方法中发现了很大的可变性。结果变量包括非自愿治疗率、症状管理、未满足的需求、药物使用和监测、诊断和精神病学转诊。在所有七项相关研究中,移民比非移民更有可能接受非自愿治疗。关注其他结果测量的研究数量不足,限制了分析。结论:许多研究强调了护理方面的差异,特别是在非自愿住院方面。结果测量各不相同,偏离了既定的质量度量标准。没有足够的数据来确定所识别的护理差异是否代表护理提供差距。使用标准化措施的研究将有助于评估移民和患有NELP的患者所接受的护理质量。
期刊介绍:
Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.