Psychosocial moderators of the association between pain intensity and physical function in people with systemic sclerosis.

IF 1.4 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Daniel Whibley, Deeba Minhas, John A Sturgeon, Yen T Chen, Anna Kratz, Dinesh Khanna, Susan L Murphy
{"title":"Psychosocial moderators of the association between pain intensity and physical function in people with systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Daniel Whibley, Deeba Minhas, John A Sturgeon, Yen T Chen, Anna Kratz, Dinesh Khanna, Susan L Murphy","doi":"10.1177/23971983241312542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a prevalent symptom of systemic sclerosis. While previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between higher pain intensity and lower physical function in individuals with systemic sclerosis, the potentially moderating effect of psychosocial factors on the association has yet to be explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from a fatigue self-management trial for adults with systemic sclerosis. Baseline questionnaire instruments measured pain intensity (11-point scale), physical function (PROMIS 4a short form), and psychosocial factors: positive and negative affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), anxiety, depression (PROMIS short forms), and self-efficacy domains (PROMIS item banks). Linear regression quantified the pain intensity-physical function association with interaction terms for candidate psychosocial moderators included in separate models (adjusted for age, systemic sclerosis subtype, and disease duration).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 173 participants (mean age 54.5, Standard Deviation 11.7, 93% female, 83% White), 47% had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, 35% limited, 13% overlap, and 5% other/unsure. Mean pain intensity was 4.9 (Standard Deviation 2.3) and mean physical function T-score was 38.5 (Standard Deviation 6.4). Pain intensity accounted for 31% of the variability in physical function (B -1.34, 95% confidence interval -1.69, -0.99). Statistically significant interactions were found between pain intensity and negative affect and anxiety, with higher levels of these factors amplifying the negative pain-physical function association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that higher levels of negative affect and anxiety exacerbate the negative effect of pain on physical function in individuals with systemic sclerosis. Interventions targeting these factors may help improve overall physical function regardless of pain intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"23971983241312542"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983241312542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is a prevalent symptom of systemic sclerosis. While previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between higher pain intensity and lower physical function in individuals with systemic sclerosis, the potentially moderating effect of psychosocial factors on the association has yet to be explored.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from a fatigue self-management trial for adults with systemic sclerosis. Baseline questionnaire instruments measured pain intensity (11-point scale), physical function (PROMIS 4a short form), and psychosocial factors: positive and negative affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), anxiety, depression (PROMIS short forms), and self-efficacy domains (PROMIS item banks). Linear regression quantified the pain intensity-physical function association with interaction terms for candidate psychosocial moderators included in separate models (adjusted for age, systemic sclerosis subtype, and disease duration).

Results: Among 173 participants (mean age 54.5, Standard Deviation 11.7, 93% female, 83% White), 47% had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, 35% limited, 13% overlap, and 5% other/unsure. Mean pain intensity was 4.9 (Standard Deviation 2.3) and mean physical function T-score was 38.5 (Standard Deviation 6.4). Pain intensity accounted for 31% of the variability in physical function (B -1.34, 95% confidence interval -1.69, -0.99). Statistically significant interactions were found between pain intensity and negative affect and anxiety, with higher levels of these factors amplifying the negative pain-physical function association.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that higher levels of negative affect and anxiety exacerbate the negative effect of pain on physical function in individuals with systemic sclerosis. Interventions targeting these factors may help improve overall physical function regardless of pain intensity.

系统性硬化症患者疼痛强度与身体功能之间关系的社会心理调节因子。
背景:疼痛是系统性硬化症的常见症状。虽然之前的研究已经证明了系统性硬化症患者较高的疼痛强度和较低的身体功能之间的相关性,但社会心理因素在这种关联中的潜在调节作用尚未被探索。方法:这项横断面研究使用了系统性硬化症成人疲劳自我管理试验的数据。基线问卷工具测量疼痛强度(11分制)、身体机能(PROMIS 4a短表)和心理社会因素:积极和消极影响(积极和消极影响表)、恢复力(康纳-戴维森恢复力量表)、焦虑、抑郁(PROMIS短表)和自我效能域(PROMIS项目库)。线性回归量化了疼痛强度-身体功能与候选社会心理调节因子相互作用项的关联,包括在单独的模型中(根据年龄、系统性硬化症亚型和疾病持续时间进行调整)。结果:在173名参与者中(平均年龄54.5岁,标准差11.7,93%女性,83%白人),47%患有弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症,35%有限,13%重叠,5%其他/不确定。平均疼痛强度为4.9(标准差为2.3),平均身体功能t评分为38.5(标准差为6.4)。疼痛强度占身体功能变异性的31% (B -1.34, 95%可信区间-1.69,-0.99)。在统计上发现疼痛强度与负面情绪和焦虑之间存在显著的相互作用,这些因素的水平越高,疼痛与身体功能的负面关联就越大。结论:这些发现表明,在系统性硬化症患者中,较高水平的负面情绪和焦虑加剧了疼痛对身体功能的负面影响。针对这些因素的干预可能有助于改善整体身体功能,而不管疼痛强度如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信