Effect of Two Different Penetration Depths of Micro-osteoperforation on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Prospective Clinical Study.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_107_24
Abhay Kumar Jain, Shresthaa Singh, Parul Priya, Nishita Garg, Abhishek Kumar, Monalisa Goswami
{"title":"Effect of Two Different Penetration Depths of Micro-osteoperforation on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Prospective Clinical Study.","authors":"Abhay Kumar Jain, Shresthaa Singh, Parul Priya, Nishita Garg, Abhishek Kumar, Monalisa Goswami","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_107_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of two different penetration depths of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement over 60 days. In addition, the amount of pain and discomfort caused by the MOP was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 22 patients (18-30 years) who need fixed orthodontic treatment were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups. Randomization for determination of the experimental side and depth of perforations was done using sealed envelopes. On each patient, the other side of the mouth worked as control side with no MOPs. Patients in group 1 (MOP-5) received 3MOPs on the buccal surface of the alveolar bone each at 5 mm depth, whereas patients in group 2 (MOP-7) received 3MOPs on the buccal surface of the alveolar bone each at 7 mm depth. The amount of canine retraction was measured every 30 days at two intervals on both sides of the mouth. Pain perception was measured after 1 h, 24 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 28 days of procedure. MOP-related pain was measured using a visual analog scale. The level of statistical significance was <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result of the intra-examiner reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient more than 0.97 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), indicating excellent repeatability and reliability of the measurements. The baseline characteristics between groups were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Both the groups demonstrated a significantly higher canine movement than the control group. No significant difference was seen between the MOP-5 and MOP-7 groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05) in terms of canine retraction. Mild-to-moderate pain was experienced only in the first 24 h of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three MOPs with a depth of 5 mm can be performed as an effective method to increase the rate of tooth movement. However, increasing the depth of perforation beyond 5 mm does not additionally enhance tooth movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10632,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","volume":"15 4","pages":"251-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_107_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of two different penetration depths of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement over 60 days. In addition, the amount of pain and discomfort caused by the MOP was evaluated.

Materials and methods: A total of 22 patients (18-30 years) who need fixed orthodontic treatment were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups. Randomization for determination of the experimental side and depth of perforations was done using sealed envelopes. On each patient, the other side of the mouth worked as control side with no MOPs. Patients in group 1 (MOP-5) received 3MOPs on the buccal surface of the alveolar bone each at 5 mm depth, whereas patients in group 2 (MOP-7) received 3MOPs on the buccal surface of the alveolar bone each at 7 mm depth. The amount of canine retraction was measured every 30 days at two intervals on both sides of the mouth. Pain perception was measured after 1 h, 24 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 28 days of procedure. MOP-related pain was measured using a visual analog scale. The level of statistical significance was P ≤ 0.05.

Results: The result of the intra-examiner reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient more than 0.97 (P < 0.001), indicating excellent repeatability and reliability of the measurements. The baseline characteristics between groups were similar (P > 0.05). Both the groups demonstrated a significantly higher canine movement than the control group. No significant difference was seen between the MOP-5 and MOP-7 groups (P > 0.05) in terms of canine retraction. Mild-to-moderate pain was experienced only in the first 24 h of the procedure.

Conclusion: Three MOPs with a depth of 5 mm can be performed as an effective method to increase the rate of tooth movement. However, increasing the depth of perforation beyond 5 mm does not additionally enhance tooth movement.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Contemporary Clinical Dentistry (CCD) (Print ISSN: 0976-237X, E-ISSN:0976- 2361) is peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of Maharishi Markandeshwar University and issues are published quarterly in the last week of March, June, September and December. The Journal publishes Original research papers, clinical studies, case series strictly of clinical interest. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of Dentistry i.e. Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Dentofacial orthopedics and Orthodontics, Oral medicine and Radiology, Oral pathology, Oral surgery, Orodental diseases, Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontics, Clinical aspects of Public Health dentistry and Prosthodontics. Review articles are not accepted. Review, if published, will only be by invitation from eminent scholars and academicians of National and International repute in the field of Medical/Dental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信