Occupational histories in neuropathologically confirmed multiple system atrophy.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
William P Cheshire, Philip W Tipton, Shunsuke Koga, Hiroaki Sekiya, Ryan J Uitti, Owen A Ross, Michael G Heckman, Hanna J Sledge, Dennis W Dickson
{"title":"Occupational histories in neuropathologically confirmed multiple system atrophy.","authors":"William P Cheshire, Philip W Tipton, Shunsuke Koga, Hiroaki Sekiya, Ryan J Uitti, Owen A Ross, Michael G Heckman, Hanna J Sledge, Dennis W Dickson","doi":"10.1007/s10286-025-01109-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined occupational histories in multiple system atrophy to identify environmental associations of potential relevance to disease causation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 270 neuropathologically confirmed cases of multiple system atrophy obtained from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank for neurodegenerative disorders in Jacksonville, Florida, were included in this case-control study. Demographic and disease information was collected from medical records. Information regarding occupational history was collected retrospectively from medical records and published obituaries. Proportions of employment by occupational sector were compared with US census data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing patients with US census data, significant differences were identified for education (15.2% versus 2.3%, P < 0.001), administration (14.8% versus 4.1%, P < 0.001), clerical (10.7% versus 5.5%, P = 0.001), petroleum industry (8.9% versus 5.6%, P = 0.024), metal industry (7.8% versus 3.0%, P < 0.001), electrical engineers and electricians (5.6% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001), civil or mechanical engineering (4.4% versus 0.2%, P < 0.001), real estate (4.4% versus 0.7%, P < 0.001), information technology (4.1% versus 1.8%, P = 0.011), woodworking (3.0% versus 0.03%, P < 0.001), writing or publishing (2.6% versus 0.3%, P < 0.001), law (2.2% versus 0.4%, P = 0.001), hairdressing (0.7% versus 0.1%, P = 0.03), and social work (0.7% versus 0.1%, P = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The listed occupational categories were significantly overrepresented in our series of patients with multiple system atrophy as compared with population data. We hypothesize that these occupational associations may signify environmental exposures, increasing the disease risk in genetically susceptible individuals. We cannot exclude a potential selection bias in patients willing to donate their brains to an academic center to contribute to scientific knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-025-01109-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined occupational histories in multiple system atrophy to identify environmental associations of potential relevance to disease causation.

Methods: A total of 270 neuropathologically confirmed cases of multiple system atrophy obtained from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank for neurodegenerative disorders in Jacksonville, Florida, were included in this case-control study. Demographic and disease information was collected from medical records. Information regarding occupational history was collected retrospectively from medical records and published obituaries. Proportions of employment by occupational sector were compared with US census data.

Results: When comparing patients with US census data, significant differences were identified for education (15.2% versus 2.3%, P < 0.001), administration (14.8% versus 4.1%, P < 0.001), clerical (10.7% versus 5.5%, P = 0.001), petroleum industry (8.9% versus 5.6%, P = 0.024), metal industry (7.8% versus 3.0%, P < 0.001), electrical engineers and electricians (5.6% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001), civil or mechanical engineering (4.4% versus 0.2%, P < 0.001), real estate (4.4% versus 0.7%, P < 0.001), information technology (4.1% versus 1.8%, P = 0.011), woodworking (3.0% versus 0.03%, P < 0.001), writing or publishing (2.6% versus 0.3%, P < 0.001), law (2.2% versus 0.4%, P = 0.001), hairdressing (0.7% versus 0.1%, P = 0.03), and social work (0.7% versus 0.1%, P = 0.03).

Conclusions: The listed occupational categories were significantly overrepresented in our series of patients with multiple system atrophy as compared with population data. We hypothesize that these occupational associations may signify environmental exposures, increasing the disease risk in genetically susceptible individuals. We cannot exclude a potential selection bias in patients willing to donate their brains to an academic center to contribute to scientific knowledge.

职业病史病理证实多系统萎缩。
目的:本研究考察了多系统萎缩的职业史,以确定与疾病病因潜在相关的环境关联。方法:共270例神经病理证实的多系统萎缩病例来自佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔梅奥诊所脑库的神经退行性疾病,纳入本病例对照研究。从医疗记录中收集人口统计和疾病信息。回顾性地从医疗记录和发表的讣告中收集有关职业史的信息。按职业部门划分的就业比例与美国人口普查数据进行了比较。结果:当将患者与美国人口普查数据进行比较时,发现教育程度存在显著差异(15.2%对2.3%)。结论:与人口数据相比,我们的多系统萎缩患者系列中列出的职业类别明显过高。我们假设这些职业关联可能意味着环境暴露,增加了遗传易感个体的疾病风险。我们不能排除那些愿意将自己的大脑捐赠给学术中心以贡献科学知识的患者的潜在选择偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信