Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Different Furcal Perforation Repair Materials: An In vitro Study.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_253_24
Sriparna De, N Sathyajith Naik, Shivangi Sharma, Pallavi Vashisth, Rasleen Dua, Priya Maheshwari
{"title":"Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Different Furcal Perforation Repair Materials: An <i>In vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Sriparna De, N Sathyajith Naik, Shivangi Sharma, Pallavi Vashisth, Rasleen Dua, Priya Maheshwari","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_253_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice of sealing material is a crucial factor that influences the outcome of endodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Angelus, Endocem MTA, and NeoPutty MTA when used as furcal perforation repair materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 45 mandibular molars were used. Root canal treatment was carried out following which standardized furcal perforations were made. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 15 teeth each. Group A-Furcal perforation repair by means of MTA Angelus, Group B-Furcal perforation repair using Endocem MTA, and Group C-Furcal perforation repair by NeoPutty MTA. Following the repair procedure, the pulp chambers and access openings were filled with temporary restorative material and immersed in 1% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally and the linear dye penetration was measured using a stereo-microscope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a statistically significant difference among the groups (<i>F</i> = 16.15, <i>P</i> < 0.001). On calculating the depth of leakage to the total length of the perforation, it was observed that the mean leakage was 32.83% in Group I, 52.92% in Group II and the lowest, 16.35% in Group III. The ANOVA test reveals a statistically significant difference among the groups (<i>F</i> = 15.92, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Comparing the depth of dye penetration of dye, 33.3% of the Group I samples showed ≥50%, 49%-25%, and <25% dye penetration. Although 56.7% of Group II samples showed ≥50% dye penetration, whereas 63.3% of Group III showed <25% dye penetration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study indicated that NeoPutty MTA had the least dye penetration followed by MTA Angelus and Endocem MTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10632,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","volume":"15 4","pages":"259-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_253_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The choice of sealing material is a crucial factor that influences the outcome of endodontic treatment.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Angelus, Endocem MTA, and NeoPutty MTA when used as furcal perforation repair materials.

Materials and methods: A total of 45 mandibular molars were used. Root canal treatment was carried out following which standardized furcal perforations were made. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 15 teeth each. Group A-Furcal perforation repair by means of MTA Angelus, Group B-Furcal perforation repair using Endocem MTA, and Group C-Furcal perforation repair by NeoPutty MTA. Following the repair procedure, the pulp chambers and access openings were filled with temporary restorative material and immersed in 1% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally and the linear dye penetration was measured using a stereo-microscope.

Results: The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a statistically significant difference among the groups (F = 16.15, P < 0.001). On calculating the depth of leakage to the total length of the perforation, it was observed that the mean leakage was 32.83% in Group I, 52.92% in Group II and the lowest, 16.35% in Group III. The ANOVA test reveals a statistically significant difference among the groups (F = 15.92, P < 0.001). Comparing the depth of dye penetration of dye, 33.3% of the Group I samples showed ≥50%, 49%-25%, and <25% dye penetration. Although 56.7% of Group II samples showed ≥50% dye penetration, whereas 63.3% of Group III showed <25% dye penetration.

Conclusion: The present study indicated that NeoPutty MTA had the least dye penetration followed by MTA Angelus and Endocem MTA.

体视显微镜下评价三种不同孔洞修复材料的封闭能力:体外研究。
背景:充填材料的选择是影响根管治疗效果的关键因素。目的:比较三氧化矿物骨料(mineral trioxide aggregate, MTA) Angelus、Endocem MTA和NeoPutty MTA作为裂孔修复材料的封堵能力。材料和方法:共使用45颗下颌磨牙。根管治疗后进行标准化的分叉穿孔。将标本随机分为三组,每组15颗牙齿。a组采用MTA Angelus修复,b组采用Endocem MTA修复,c组采用NeoPutty MTA修复。修复完成后,用临时修复材料填充牙髓腔和通道口,浸泡在1%的碱性紫红染料中24小时。牙齿纵向切片,用立体显微镜测量线性染料渗透。结果:单因素方差分析(ANOVA)显示各组间差异有统计学意义(F = 16.15, P < 0.001)。计算渗漏深度占穿孔总长度的比例,结果显示,第一组平均渗漏率为32.83%,第二组为52.92%,第三组最低,为16.35%。方差分析显示组间差异有统计学意义(F = 15.92, P < 0.001)。比较染料的染料渗透深度,33.3%的I组样品的染料渗透深度≥50%,49%-25%。结论:本研究表明NeoPutty MTA的染料渗透最少,其次是MTA Angelus和Endocem MTA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Contemporary Clinical Dentistry (CCD) (Print ISSN: 0976-237X, E-ISSN:0976- 2361) is peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of Maharishi Markandeshwar University and issues are published quarterly in the last week of March, June, September and December. The Journal publishes Original research papers, clinical studies, case series strictly of clinical interest. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of Dentistry i.e. Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Dentofacial orthopedics and Orthodontics, Oral medicine and Radiology, Oral pathology, Oral surgery, Orodental diseases, Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontics, Clinical aspects of Public Health dentistry and Prosthodontics. Review articles are not accepted. Review, if published, will only be by invitation from eminent scholars and academicians of National and International repute in the field of Medical/Dental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信