Continuous local infiltration analgesia is equal to femoral and sciatic nerve block for total knee arthroplasty.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Christoph Simon, Matthias Schwab, Hanns Ackermann, Lukas Krüerke, Dirk Meininger
{"title":"Continuous local infiltration analgesia is equal to femoral and sciatic nerve block for total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Christoph Simon, Matthias Schwab, Hanns Ackermann, Lukas Krüerke, Dirk Meininger","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05641-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Pain control is crucial for rapid mobilisation and reduces side effects as well as the length of hospital stay. In this context, a variety of multimodal pain control regimes show good pain relief, including several nerve blocks, iPACK and local infiltration analgesia (LIA). To compare the analgesic potency of LIA and the combination of continuous femoral nerve block + sciatic single-shot nerve block under general anaesthesia, we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blinded single-centre study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong> 139 ASA I-III Patients were enrolled in the study, randomised into two groups. The LIA group received an intra- and periarticular infiltration containing a mix of ropivacaine 0,2%, adrenaline and ketorolac, followed by an infusion of the same mixture for 48 h via an intraarticular catheter. The patients in the FEM group received a combination of continuous femoral nerve block with a catheter using 30 ml prilocaine 1% and ropivacaine 0,2% plus a single-shot sciatic nerve block via an antero-medial approach (landmark-based technique) with 20 ml ropivacaine 0,75%. Postoperative pain scores were analysed during the first two postoperative days, as well as opioid consumption, the degree of knee movement and the occurrence of infections in both groups applying the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, Friedman chi-square test and the Log-rank-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in pain scores, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, knee range of motion, age, height, weight and ASA could be detected. No severe side effects, such as secondary bleeding or infections, were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both techniques are well established, provide equal pain relief for TKA and support early postoperative mobilisation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS 00027145 08/12/2021. \"retrospectively registered\".</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05641-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. Pain control is crucial for rapid mobilisation and reduces side effects as well as the length of hospital stay. In this context, a variety of multimodal pain control regimes show good pain relief, including several nerve blocks, iPACK and local infiltration analgesia (LIA). To compare the analgesic potency of LIA and the combination of continuous femoral nerve block + sciatic single-shot nerve block under general anaesthesia, we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blinded single-centre study.

Method:  139 ASA I-III Patients were enrolled in the study, randomised into two groups. The LIA group received an intra- and periarticular infiltration containing a mix of ropivacaine 0,2%, adrenaline and ketorolac, followed by an infusion of the same mixture for 48 h via an intraarticular catheter. The patients in the FEM group received a combination of continuous femoral nerve block with a catheter using 30 ml prilocaine 1% and ropivacaine 0,2% plus a single-shot sciatic nerve block via an antero-medial approach (landmark-based technique) with 20 ml ropivacaine 0,75%. Postoperative pain scores were analysed during the first two postoperative days, as well as opioid consumption, the degree of knee movement and the occurrence of infections in both groups applying the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, Friedman chi-square test and the Log-rank-test.

Results: No significant difference in pain scores, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, knee range of motion, age, height, weight and ASA could be detected. No severe side effects, such as secondary bleeding or infections, were reported.

Conclusion: Both techniques are well established, provide equal pain relief for TKA and support early postoperative mobilisation.

Trial registration: DRKS 00027145 08/12/2021. "retrospectively registered".

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信