Irma T Ugalde, Kenneth Yen, Grant Tatro, Paul Ishimine, Nisa S Atigapramoj, Pradip P Chaudhari, Kevan A McCarten-Gibbs, Mohamed Badawy, Jeffrey S Upperman, Nathan Kuppermann, James F Holmes
{"title":"Incidental Findings on Computed Tomography in Children With Blunt Abdominal Trauma.","authors":"Irma T Ugalde, Kenneth Yen, Grant Tatro, Paul Ishimine, Nisa S Atigapramoj, Pradip P Chaudhari, Kevan A McCarten-Gibbs, Mohamed Badawy, Jeffrey S Upperman, Nathan Kuppermann, James F Holmes","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>Nontraumatic, incidental findings on computed tomography (CT) may be discovered after blunt abdominal trauma in children; however, the rate and importance of these findings are not well known. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and types of incidental CT findings among injured children undergoing abdominal/pelvic CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of children (<18 years) who underwent abdominal/pelvic CT after blunt trauma. We abstracted radiology reports for nontraumatic findings. We assessed and classified findings by their clinical urgency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,581 children enrolled, 2,500 (33%) underwent abdominal/pelvic CT. The mean patient age was 10.1±4.8 years, and 1,446 (58%) were boys. A total of 988 (39.5%, 95% CI 37.6 to 41.5%) children had 1,552 incidental findings with a mean patient age of 10.6±4.8 years, of whom 59% were boys. Fifty-five (3.5%) incidental findings were considered to need immediate evaluation/treatment, and 84 (5.4%) were considered to require outpatient follow-up within 4 weeks. Most incidental findings, however, were considered less urgent regarding follow-up: 552 (36%) were routine, 574 (37%) were considered to have a potential need, and 287 (18%) did not need follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Forty percent of children undergoing CT scanning after abdominal trauma have incidental findings, few of which are clinically important and require timely follow-up. CT scans should be obtained only when necessary, and clinicians must be prepared to address incidental findings and ensure proper management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.12.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study objective: Nontraumatic, incidental findings on computed tomography (CT) may be discovered after blunt abdominal trauma in children; however, the rate and importance of these findings are not well known. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and types of incidental CT findings among injured children undergoing abdominal/pelvic CT.
Methods: This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of children (<18 years) who underwent abdominal/pelvic CT after blunt trauma. We abstracted radiology reports for nontraumatic findings. We assessed and classified findings by their clinical urgency.
Results: Of 7,581 children enrolled, 2,500 (33%) underwent abdominal/pelvic CT. The mean patient age was 10.1±4.8 years, and 1,446 (58%) were boys. A total of 988 (39.5%, 95% CI 37.6 to 41.5%) children had 1,552 incidental findings with a mean patient age of 10.6±4.8 years, of whom 59% were boys. Fifty-five (3.5%) incidental findings were considered to need immediate evaluation/treatment, and 84 (5.4%) were considered to require outpatient follow-up within 4 weeks. Most incidental findings, however, were considered less urgent regarding follow-up: 552 (36%) were routine, 574 (37%) were considered to have a potential need, and 287 (18%) did not need follow-up.
Conclusions: Forty percent of children undergoing CT scanning after abdominal trauma have incidental findings, few of which are clinically important and require timely follow-up. CT scans should be obtained only when necessary, and clinicians must be prepared to address incidental findings and ensure proper management.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.