Letter to Editor in response to the article “Rising mortality rates linked to type-2 diabetes and obesity in the United States: An observational analysis from 1999 to 2022”

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Muheem Khan
{"title":"Letter to Editor in response to the article “Rising mortality rates linked to type-2 diabetes and obesity in the United States: An observational analysis from 1999 to 2022”","authors":"Muheem Khan","doi":"10.1111/jdi.14412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>I read with great interest the article “Rising mortality rates linked to type-2 diabetes and obesity in the United States: An observational analysis from 1999 to 2022<span><sup>1</sup></span>.” The study offers valuable insights into a critical public health issue. However, I noticed an apparent discrepancy between the statistical analysis and the graphical representation of the age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) trends.</p><p>The results section states that the AAMR increased steadily from 1999 to 2017 and then rose steeply. While I understand that the Annual Percentage Change (APC) analysis may have detected a statistical trend starting in 2017, the steep increase is more visually apparent only after 2019, as shown in figure 1. This disconnect between the statistical interpretation and the visual data could potentially confuse readers.</p><p>I would appreciate it if the authors could clarify how the APC analysis aligns with the visual trends in the graph. This clarification would ensure a more accurate understanding of the results and help bridge the gap between statistical and visual interpretations.</p><p>Thank you for your attention to this matter.</p><p>None.</p><p>The author declares no conflict of interest.</p><p>Approval of the research protocol: N/A.</p><p>Informed consent: N/A.</p><p>Registry and the registration no. of the study/trial: N/A.</p><p>Animal studies: N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":51250,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":"16 3","pages":"563"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jdi.14412","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdi.14412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor,

I read with great interest the article “Rising mortality rates linked to type-2 diabetes and obesity in the United States: An observational analysis from 1999 to 20221.” The study offers valuable insights into a critical public health issue. However, I noticed an apparent discrepancy between the statistical analysis and the graphical representation of the age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) trends.

The results section states that the AAMR increased steadily from 1999 to 2017 and then rose steeply. While I understand that the Annual Percentage Change (APC) analysis may have detected a statistical trend starting in 2017, the steep increase is more visually apparent only after 2019, as shown in figure 1. This disconnect between the statistical interpretation and the visual data could potentially confuse readers.

I would appreciate it if the authors could clarify how the APC analysis aligns with the visual trends in the graph. This clarification would ensure a more accurate understanding of the results and help bridge the gap between statistical and visual interpretations.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

None.

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Approval of the research protocol: N/A.

Informed consent: N/A.

Registry and the registration no. of the study/trial: N/A.

Animal studies: N/A.

致编辑的回复《美国与2型糖尿病和肥胖相关的死亡率上升:1999年至2022年的观察性分析》一文的信。
亲爱的编辑,我怀着极大的兴趣读了一篇文章《美国与2型糖尿病和肥胖相关的死亡率上升:1999年至2021年的观察性分析》。这项研究为一个关键的公共卫生问题提供了有价值的见解。然而,我注意到统计分析和年龄调整死亡率(AAMR)趋势的图形表示之间存在明显差异。结果部分指出,从1999年到2017年,AAMR稳步上升,然后急剧上升。虽然我知道年度百分比变化(APC)分析可能已经发现了从2017年开始的统计趋势,但只有在2019年之后,这种急剧增长才更加明显,如图1所示。统计解释和视觉数据之间的这种脱节可能会让读者感到困惑。如果作者能够澄清APC分析如何与图表中的视觉趋势保持一致,我将不胜感激。这种澄清将确保对结果有更准确的了解,并有助于弥合统计解释和视觉解释之间的差距。谢谢您对此事的关注。无。作者声明无利益冲突。研究方案的批准:无。知情同意:无。注册表及注册编号研究/试验:无。动物研究:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信