Uterine artery embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hassan Elbiss, Shamsa Al Awar, Jamal Koteesh, Howaida Khair, Sara Maki, Dana H. Abdalla, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
{"title":"Uterine artery embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage","authors":"Hassan Elbiss, Shamsa Al Awar, Jamal Koteesh, Howaida Khair, Sara Maki, Dana H. Abdalla, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality causing one-fourth of all maternal deaths. We aimed to study the role of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in controlling PPH and its impact on the need for hysterectomy. We studied patients who were diagnosed with primary PPH between February 2012 and March 2020 at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing interventional radiology via UAE. Logistic regression analysis was done to define the factors that predict the need for emergency UAE. Out of 79 patients who had elective (n = 53) or emergency (n = 26) embolization, the placenta previa accreta (69.8% vs. 23.1%) and placenta previa (24.4% vs. 3.8%) were the common indications for elective versus emergency UAE (p < 0.001). The indication for UAE was the most significant factor for predicting an emergency procedure (p = 0.002) with placenta previa being significantly different from other indications (p < 0.001). Bleeding stopped in 78/79 patients (success rate of 98.7%) following UAE. Those who failed stopping of the bleeding were similar between the elective and emergency IR, (1/53 (1.9%) compared with 0/26 (0%), p = 0.99 Fisher’s Exact test). Overall, eight patients (10%) had hysterectomy, one of them was needed as the final solution to stop bleeding. There were no maternal deaths. Interventional radiological UAE is very efficient in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. It should be recommended as the first line of treatment for significant bleeding when expertise and facilities are available. It increases survival, reduces hysterectomy rate, without a difference if done as an emergency or elective procedure.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00580-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal morbidity and mortality causing one-fourth of all maternal deaths. We aimed to study the role of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in controlling PPH and its impact on the need for hysterectomy. We studied patients who were diagnosed with primary PPH between February 2012 and March 2020 at Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing interventional radiology via UAE. Logistic regression analysis was done to define the factors that predict the need for emergency UAE. Out of 79 patients who had elective (n = 53) or emergency (n = 26) embolization, the placenta previa accreta (69.8% vs. 23.1%) and placenta previa (24.4% vs. 3.8%) were the common indications for elective versus emergency UAE (p < 0.001). The indication for UAE was the most significant factor for predicting an emergency procedure (p = 0.002) with placenta previa being significantly different from other indications (p < 0.001). Bleeding stopped in 78/79 patients (success rate of 98.7%) following UAE. Those who failed stopping of the bleeding were similar between the elective and emergency IR, (1/53 (1.9%) compared with 0/26 (0%), p = 0.99 Fisher’s Exact test). Overall, eight patients (10%) had hysterectomy, one of them was needed as the final solution to stop bleeding. There were no maternal deaths. Interventional radiological UAE is very efficient in controlling postpartum hemorrhage. It should be recommended as the first line of treatment for significant bleeding when expertise and facilities are available. It increases survival, reduces hysterectomy rate, without a difference if done as an emergency or elective procedure.
子宫动脉栓塞术在产后出血治疗中的应用
产后出血是孕产妇发病和死亡的主要可预防原因之一,占孕产妇死亡总数的四分之一。我们的目的是研究子宫动脉栓塞(UAE)在控制PPH中的作用及其对子宫切除术需求的影响。我们研究了2012年2月至2020年3月在阿拉伯联合酋长国Al Ain医院被诊断为原发性PPH的患者。我们研究了经阿联酋行介入放射治疗的患者的特点和预后。进行了Logistic回归分析,以确定预测紧急UAE需求的因素。在79例选择性栓塞(n = 53)或急诊栓塞(n = 26)的患者中,前置胎盘增生(69.8%对23.1%)和前置胎盘(24.4%对3.8%)是选择性UAE和急诊UAE的常见适应症(p < 0.001)。UAE的适应症是预测紧急手术的最重要因素(p = 0.002),前置胎盘与其他适应症有显著差异(p < 0.001)。79例患者中78例出血停止(成功率98.7%)。在择期和紧急IR中,止血失败的患者相似,(1/53(1.9%)与0/26(0%)相比,p = 0.99 Fisher 's Exact检验)。总体而言,8例患者(10%)进行了子宫切除术,其中1例需要作为止血的最终解决方案。没有产妇死亡。介入放射UAE治疗产后出血疗效显著。在具备专业知识和设施的情况下,应建议将其作为治疗大出血的第一线。它增加了生存率,降低了子宫切除术率,如果作为紧急手术或选择性手术,没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信