{"title":"Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation for Controlling Pain after the Archwire Placement.","authors":"Ankit Mishra, Ragni Tandon, Aftab Azam, Pratik Chandra","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_32_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for controlling pain after the archwire placement and then comparison between the placebo, extra-oral, and intra-oral group depending upon the electrode placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study consists of a sample size of 90 patients who were further divided into three groups. Each group had 30 samples each, and the groups were divided into placebo group, extra-oral TENS group, and intra-oral TENS group. TENS application was done after the bonding and ligation of initial archwire. The patients were asked to record the level of pain on a VAS form at 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours interval.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>On comparison of VAS of all the three groups at 8 hours intervals significant result (<i>P</i> = 0.037) has occurred. Individual intra-group comparison has also shown some significant result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TENS being a non-pharmacological, non-invasive method for controlling pain is found to be effective. Both the extra-oral and intra-oral applications are effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"15 3","pages":"474-479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_32_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for controlling pain after the archwire placement and then comparison between the placebo, extra-oral, and intra-oral group depending upon the electrode placement.
Materials and methods: The study consists of a sample size of 90 patients who were further divided into three groups. Each group had 30 samples each, and the groups were divided into placebo group, extra-oral TENS group, and intra-oral TENS group. TENS application was done after the bonding and ligation of initial archwire. The patients were asked to record the level of pain on a VAS form at 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours interval.
Result: On comparison of VAS of all the three groups at 8 hours intervals significant result (P = 0.037) has occurred. Individual intra-group comparison has also shown some significant result.
Conclusion: TENS being a non-pharmacological, non-invasive method for controlling pain is found to be effective. Both the extra-oral and intra-oral applications are effective.
简介:本研究的目的是评估经皮神经电刺激(TENS)在弓丝放置后控制疼痛的有效性,然后根据电极放置的不同将安慰剂组、口服外组和口服内组进行比较。材料和方法:本研究的样本量为90例患者,并将其进一步分为三组。每组30个样本,分为安慰剂组、口服外TENS组和口服内TENS组。在初始弓丝粘接结扎后进行TENS应用。患者被要求每隔4小时、8小时、12小时、24小时和48小时在VAS表格上记录疼痛程度。结果:三组患者每隔8 h VAS评分比较均有显著差异(P = 0.037)。个体组内比较也显示出一些显著的结果。结论:TENS是一种非药物、无创的控制疼痛的方法。口腔外和口腔内应用均有效。