Gustavo Adolfo Vásquez-Tirado , Edinson Dante Meregildo-Rodríguez , Claudia Vanessa Quispe-Castañeda , María Cuadra-Campos , Wilson Marcial Guzmán-Aguilar , Percy Hernán Abanto-Montalván , Hugo Alva-Guarniz , Leslie Jacqueline Liñán-Díaz , Luis Ángel Rodríguez-Chávez
{"title":"Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow coma scale (rSIG) to predict mortality in traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Gustavo Adolfo Vásquez-Tirado , Edinson Dante Meregildo-Rodríguez , Claudia Vanessa Quispe-Castañeda , María Cuadra-Campos , Wilson Marcial Guzmán-Aguilar , Percy Hernán Abanto-Montalván , Hugo Alva-Guarniz , Leslie Jacqueline Liñán-Díaz , Luis Ángel Rodríguez-Chávez","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine whether the Reverse Shock Index<span><span> multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) is a predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with </span>traumatic brain injury (TBI).</span></div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This is a systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases for studies published up to May 22, 2024, using a PECO strategy. Eight studies were identified for quantitative analysis and included in our meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>The participants of the included primary studies.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Patients with a low rSIG as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in TBI.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>rSIG, in-hospital mortality, TBI.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our meta-analysis evaluated a total of eight observational studies encompassing 430,000 patients with TBI, observing 6,417 deaths (15%). After performing a sensitivity analysis, we found that patients with TBI and a low value of the reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) had a 24% higher risk of death (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.12–1.38; I²: 96%). Furthermore, rSIG values were significantly higher in survivors compared to those who died (MD 7.72; 95% CI 1.86–13.58; I²: 99%).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"49 9","pages":"Article 502149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572725000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine whether the Reverse Shock Index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) is a predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Design
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Setting
A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases for studies published up to May 22, 2024, using a PECO strategy. Eight studies were identified for quantitative analysis and included in our meta-analysis.
Participants
The participants of the included primary studies.
Interventions
Patients with a low rSIG as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in TBI.
Main variables of interest
rSIG, in-hospital mortality, TBI.
Results
Our meta-analysis evaluated a total of eight observational studies encompassing 430,000 patients with TBI, observing 6,417 deaths (15%). After performing a sensitivity analysis, we found that patients with TBI and a low value of the reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG) had a 24% higher risk of death (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.12–1.38; I²: 96%). Furthermore, rSIG values were significantly higher in survivors compared to those who died (MD 7.72; 95% CI 1.86–13.58; I²: 99%).
目的:确定逆休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷量表(rSIG)是否可以预测外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的住院死亡率。设计:这是一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。设置:使用PECO策略,在五个数据库中对截至2024年5月22日发表的研究进行了全面检索。8项研究被确定用于定量分析,并纳入我们的荟萃分析。参与者:纳入的主要研究的参与者。干预措施:低rSIG患者作为TBI住院死亡率的预测因子。主要感兴趣的变量:rSIG,住院死亡率,TBI。结果:我们的荟萃分析共评估了8项观察性研究,包括430,000例TBI患者,观察到6,417例死亡(15%)。在进行敏感性分析后,我们发现,与格拉斯哥昏迷量表(rSIG)相比,逆行休克指数较低的TBI患者的死亡风险高出24% (OR 1.24;95% ci 1.12-1.38;我²:96%)。此外,幸存者的rSIG值明显高于死亡患者(MD 7.72;95% ci 1.86-13.58;我²:99%)。