Development of the Foot and Ankle Activity Level Scale (FAALS) Instrument.

Lauren M Matheny, Thomas O Clanton, Jonathon D Backus, Norman E Waldrop, Karen K Briggs, Marilee P Horan, Anastasia Robinson
{"title":"Development of the Foot and Ankle Activity Level Scale (FAALS) Instrument.","authors":"Lauren M Matheny, Thomas O Clanton, Jonathon D Backus, Norman E Waldrop, Karen K Briggs, Marilee P Horan, Anastasia Robinson","doi":"10.1177/10711007241311907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Activity level is a benchmark to document patient recovery; however, there is a lack of instrumentation to measure activity level specific to the foot and ankle. The purpose of this study was to develop a foot and ankle activity level scale (FAALS) instrument that will serve as an effective clinical tool for practitioners by assigning an activity level to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a 4-phase study with 3 rounds of data collection (n = 1432). Phase 1 was item generation using an expert panel to determine content validity (101 items). In phase 2, all items from phase 1 were piloted (n = 100) to remove poorly performing items (77 items). In phase 3 (n = 505), item reduction, reliability, and validity Rasch analyses were conducted, leaving a total of 22 items. Validity was assessed using outfit mean-square (MNSQ) and infit MNSQ statistics, with acceptable values between 0.5 and 1.5. An additional round of data collection was completed to serve as a validation data set to confirm FAALS instrument structure and psychometric analytics (n = 827). Correlation analysis was performed to assess convergent and divergent validity. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine whether the FAALS could detect differences in scores between groups with previously proven factors that affect functional status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Person reliability was 0.92 and item reliability was 1.00, demonstrating excellent reliability. There was excellent evidence of validity, with mean-square values between 0.5 and 1.5. The 22 FAALS items are summed for a total score that corresponds to one of 4 activity levels. The FAALS instrument demonstrated sensitivity in the ability to discern between groups with expected foot and ankle functional differences for previous ankle surgery status, <i>t</i>(502) = -7.69, <i>P</i> < .001, and body mass index, <i>t</i>(502) = -3.41, <i>P</i> < .001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FAALS instrument is a short, clinically useful tool to measure activity level specific to the foot and ankle. FAALS normative values provide valuable information for physician-patient communication, which may serve to facilitate shared decision-making, improve postoperative care, and allow physicians to track recovery progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"10711007241311907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007241311907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Activity level is a benchmark to document patient recovery; however, there is a lack of instrumentation to measure activity level specific to the foot and ankle. The purpose of this study was to develop a foot and ankle activity level scale (FAALS) instrument that will serve as an effective clinical tool for practitioners by assigning an activity level to patients.

Methods: This was a 4-phase study with 3 rounds of data collection (n = 1432). Phase 1 was item generation using an expert panel to determine content validity (101 items). In phase 2, all items from phase 1 were piloted (n = 100) to remove poorly performing items (77 items). In phase 3 (n = 505), item reduction, reliability, and validity Rasch analyses were conducted, leaving a total of 22 items. Validity was assessed using outfit mean-square (MNSQ) and infit MNSQ statistics, with acceptable values between 0.5 and 1.5. An additional round of data collection was completed to serve as a validation data set to confirm FAALS instrument structure and psychometric analytics (n = 827). Correlation analysis was performed to assess convergent and divergent validity. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine whether the FAALS could detect differences in scores between groups with previously proven factors that affect functional status.

Results: Person reliability was 0.92 and item reliability was 1.00, demonstrating excellent reliability. There was excellent evidence of validity, with mean-square values between 0.5 and 1.5. The 22 FAALS items are summed for a total score that corresponds to one of 4 activity levels. The FAALS instrument demonstrated sensitivity in the ability to discern between groups with expected foot and ankle functional differences for previous ankle surgery status, t(502) = -7.69, P < .001, and body mass index, t(502) = -3.41, P < .001.

Conclusion: The FAALS instrument is a short, clinically useful tool to measure activity level specific to the foot and ankle. FAALS normative values provide valuable information for physician-patient communication, which may serve to facilitate shared decision-making, improve postoperative care, and allow physicians to track recovery progress.

脚部和踝关节活动水平量表(FAALS)仪器的开发。
背景:活动水平是记录患者康复的基准;然而,缺乏测量足部和踝关节活动水平的仪器。本研究的目的是开发一种足部和踝关节活动水平量表(FAALS)仪器,通过为患者分配活动水平,该仪器将作为医生有效的临床工具。方法:这是一项4期研究,收集了3轮数据(n = 1432)。阶段1是使用专家小组来确定内容有效性(101个项目)的项目生成。在阶段2中,试验了阶段1中的所有项目(n = 100),以移除表现不佳的项目(77个项目)。在第三阶段(n = 505),进行项目缩减、信度和效度Rasch分析,共留下22个项目。采用均方根(MNSQ)和内均方(MNSQ)统计量评估效度,可接受值在0.5到1.5之间。完成另一轮数据收集,作为验证数据集,以确认FAALS仪器结构和心理测量分析(n = 827)。相关分析评估收敛效度和发散效度。进行多元线性回归分析,以确定FAALS是否可以检测到先前已证实的影响功能状态因素的组间评分差异。结果:人信度为0.92,项目信度为1.00,信度极佳。均方值在0.5 ~ 1.5之间,有极好的效度证据。将22个FAALS项目相加,得到对应于4个活动级别之一的总分。结论:FAALS仪器是一种短小、临床有用的测量足部和踝关节活动水平的工具,它能很好地分辨出先前踝关节手术状态下足部和踝关节功能差异的组,t(502) = -7.69, P(502) = -3.41。FAALS的规范值为医患沟通提供了有价值的信息,有助于促进共同决策,改善术后护理,并使医生能够跟踪康复进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信