Short Interval Repeat Colonoscopy After Inadequate Bowel Preparation Is Low Among Veterans.

Nicha Wongjarupong, Vijay Are, Anders Westanmo, Jenson Phung, Richie K Huynh, Tessa Herman, Nancy R Murphy, Mohammad Bilal, Susan M Lou, Brian Hanson
{"title":"Short Interval Repeat Colonoscopy After Inadequate Bowel Preparation Is Low Among Veterans.","authors":"Nicha Wongjarupong, Vijay Are, Anders Westanmo, Jenson Phung, Richie K Huynh, Tessa Herman, Nancy R Murphy, Mohammad Bilal, Susan M Lou, Brian Hanson","doi":"10.12788/fp.0510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adenoma detection rate and interval colon cancer rates are associated with bowel preparation quality. The US Multisociety Task Force recommends repeat colonoscopy for individuals with inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) within 1 year. However, little is known regarding the rate and associated factors of repeat colonoscopy after IBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, positive fecal immunohistochemistry test, and virtual colonoscopy at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center from January 2016 to October 2021 were included. IBP was classified based on Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score or Aronchick scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,466 individuals were included, of which 571 (5.5%) had IBP. Repeat colonoscopy within 1 year was recommended for 485 individuals (84.9%); 287 (59.2%) were completed within this time period and 126 (26.0%) never underwent repeat colonoscopy. Proximity to the endoscopy center was associated with a higher rate of repeat colonoscopy within 1 year (61.7% vs 51.0%, <i>P</i> = .02). Current smoking status was associated with a lower rate of repeat colonoscopy within 1 year (25.8% vs 35.9%, <i>P</i> = .02). There were no differences in age, sex, race, inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis, or opioid or anticoagulation use with adherence to repeat colonoscopy within 1 year. There was no difference in adherence to a timely repeat colonoscopy from 1 year before the COVID-19 pandemic (58.9%) vs 1 year postpandemic (59.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of IBP was 5.5%. Only 59.2% of those with IBP underwent recommended repeat colonoscopy within 1 year, and 26.0% never underwent repeat colonoscopy. Additional efforts are needed to ensure that individuals with IBP return for timely repeat colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"41 9","pages":"306-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adenoma detection rate and interval colon cancer rates are associated with bowel preparation quality. The US Multisociety Task Force recommends repeat colonoscopy for individuals with inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) within 1 year. However, little is known regarding the rate and associated factors of repeat colonoscopy after IBP.

Methods: Individuals undergoing colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, positive fecal immunohistochemistry test, and virtual colonoscopy at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center from January 2016 to October 2021 were included. IBP was classified based on Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score or Aronchick scale.

Results: A total of 10,466 individuals were included, of which 571 (5.5%) had IBP. Repeat colonoscopy within 1 year was recommended for 485 individuals (84.9%); 287 (59.2%) were completed within this time period and 126 (26.0%) never underwent repeat colonoscopy. Proximity to the endoscopy center was associated with a higher rate of repeat colonoscopy within 1 year (61.7% vs 51.0%, P = .02). Current smoking status was associated with a lower rate of repeat colonoscopy within 1 year (25.8% vs 35.9%, P = .02). There were no differences in age, sex, race, inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis, or opioid or anticoagulation use with adherence to repeat colonoscopy within 1 year. There was no difference in adherence to a timely repeat colonoscopy from 1 year before the COVID-19 pandemic (58.9%) vs 1 year postpandemic (59.9%).

Conclusions: The rate of IBP was 5.5%. Only 59.2% of those with IBP underwent recommended repeat colonoscopy within 1 year, and 26.0% never underwent repeat colonoscopy. Additional efforts are needed to ensure that individuals with IBP return for timely repeat colonoscopy.

在退伍军人中,肠准备不足后短间隔重复结肠镜检查的发生率很低。
背景:腺瘤检出率和间期结肠癌发生率与肠准备质量相关。美国多社会工作组建议对肠准备不充分(IBP)的个体在1年内重复结肠镜检查。然而,关于IBP后再次结肠镜检查的比率和相关因素知之甚少。方法:纳入2016年1月至2021年10月在明尼阿波利斯退伍军人事务医疗中心接受结肠镜筛查、监测、粪便免疫组化试验阳性和虚拟结肠镜检查的个体。IBP根据波士顿肠准备量表评分或Aronchick量表进行分类。结果:共纳入10466例,其中IBP 571例(5.5%)。485例(84.9%)建议1年内重复结肠镜检查;287例(59.2%)在此期间完成,126例(26.0%)从未再次接受结肠镜检查。靠近内镜中心与1年内重复结肠镜检查的比例较高相关(61.7% vs 51.0%, P = 0.02)。吸烟状况与1年内重复结肠镜检查率较低相关(25.8% vs 35.9%, P = 0.02)。年龄、性别、种族、炎症性肠病诊断、阿片类药物或抗凝剂使用以及1年内坚持重复结肠镜检查没有差异。COVID-19大流行前1年(58.9%)和大流行后1年(59.9%)坚持及时重复结肠镜检查的情况没有差异。结论:IBP发生率为5.5%。只有59.2%的IBP患者在1年内接受了推荐的重复结肠镜检查,26.0%的患者从未接受过重复结肠镜检查。需要额外的努力来确保IBP患者及时返回进行重复结肠镜检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信