Comparison of Guided and Unguided Botulinum Injections for Cervical Dystonia: EMG, Ultrasound, and Anatomic Landmarks.

Vered Livneh, Achinoam Faust-Socher, Mikhal E Cohen, Yosef Schechter, Ilana Israel, Roni Eichel, Tanya Gurevich, Gilad Yahalom
{"title":"Comparison of Guided and Unguided Botulinum Injections for Cervical Dystonia: EMG, Ultrasound, and Anatomic Landmarks.","authors":"Vered Livneh, Achinoam Faust-Socher, Mikhal E Cohen, Yosef Schechter, Ilana Israel, Roni Eichel, Tanya Gurevich, Gilad Yahalom","doi":"10.2174/0118715273304250241226051604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Botulinum Toxin type A (BonTA) is the preferred treatment for Cervical Dystonia (CD). However, the success rate is often suboptimal. One of the reasons for treatment failure is the in accuracy of injections. Some physicians rely on Anatomical Landmarks (AL) for injections, while others use either Ultrasound (US) or Electromyography guidance (EMGg) to improve accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective two-center study compared the therapeutic outcomes of AL-based and EMGg injections with USg injections. Demographic and clinical assessments of previous visits and current visits were recorded between 2019 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients were included. Six patients were injected using AL, 14 patients under EMGg, and 31 patients received USg injections. Pain relief was significantly lower for the AL group (40.0% ± 22.4%) compared to both USg and EMGg (81.2% ± 34.0% and 82.2% ± 10.3%, respectively; p = 0.001). Dysphagia was reported in 7.1% of EMGg and 16% of the USg group and none of those treated with AL (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of USg and EMGg BonTA injections are comparable and both techniques are superior to AL. The main side effect observed was dysphagia, which was more common in the USg group, although without reaching statistical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":93947,"journal":{"name":"CNS & neurological disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS & neurological disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715273304250241226051604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Botulinum Toxin type A (BonTA) is the preferred treatment for Cervical Dystonia (CD). However, the success rate is often suboptimal. One of the reasons for treatment failure is the in accuracy of injections. Some physicians rely on Anatomical Landmarks (AL) for injections, while others use either Ultrasound (US) or Electromyography guidance (EMGg) to improve accuracy.

Methods: This retrospective two-center study compared the therapeutic outcomes of AL-based and EMGg injections with USg injections. Demographic and clinical assessments of previous visits and current visits were recorded between 2019 and 2023.

Results: Fifty-one patients were included. Six patients were injected using AL, 14 patients under EMGg, and 31 patients received USg injections. Pain relief was significantly lower for the AL group (40.0% ± 22.4%) compared to both USg and EMGg (81.2% ± 34.0% and 82.2% ± 10.3%, respectively; p = 0.001). Dysphagia was reported in 7.1% of EMGg and 16% of the USg group and none of those treated with AL (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of USg and EMGg BonTA injections are comparable and both techniques are superior to AL. The main side effect observed was dysphagia, which was more common in the USg group, although without reaching statistical significance.

引导与非引导注射肉毒杆菌治疗宫颈肌张力障碍的比较:肌电图、超声和解剖标志。
背景:A型肉毒毒素(BonTA)是治疗宫颈肌张力障碍(CD)的首选药物。然而,成功率往往不是最优的。治疗失败的原因之一是注射的准确性不高。一些医生依靠解剖标志(AL)进行注射,而另一些医生则使用超声(US)或肌电图指导(EMGg)来提高准确性。方法:本研究采用回顾性双中心研究方法,比较了AL-based和EMGg注射与USg注射的治疗效果。在2019年至2023年期间记录了既往就诊和当前就诊的人口统计学和临床评估。结果:纳入51例患者。AL注射6例,EMGg注射14例,USg注射31例。AL组疼痛缓解(40.0%±22.4%)明显低于USg组和EMGg组(分别为81.2%±34.0%和82.2%±10.3%);P = 0.001)。EMGg组和USg组的吞咽困难发生率分别为7.1%和16%,而AL组无吞咽困难(p < 0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,USg和EMGg BonTA注射的临床结果具有可比性,两种技术均优于AL。观察到的主要副作用为吞咽困难,USg组更常见,但未达到统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信