Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding diagnosis and management of delirium at the Cayetano Heredia Hospital

Grethel Díaz-Vargas, Abigail Quiñones-Condezo, Karlos Acurio-Ortiz, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Tulio Bertorini, Martin Arévalo-Flores, Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier, Carlos Orellano
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding diagnosis and management of delirium at the Cayetano Heredia Hospital","authors":"Grethel Díaz-Vargas, Abigail Quiñones-Condezo, Karlos Acurio-Ortiz, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Tulio Bertorini, Martin Arévalo-Flores, Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier, Carlos Orellano","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v35i166.722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>delirium is a prevalent syndrome in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the knowledge, attitudes and practices about delirium among medical professionals in a tertiary referral hospital, as well as to evaluate the validity of the instrument created for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3 phase cross sectional study was carried out: 1- content validation, 2- application of the instrument and 3- Construct validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After satisfactory content validation, the instrument was applied to 148 participants. Regarding knowledge about delirium, there was an average of 57.8% correct answers (95% CI 52.5-63.1) with no significant difference between attending physicians, residents and final year medical students. 25% (n=37) reported using the Confusion Assessment Method, 31.1% (n=46) reported feeling confident in the use of antipsychotics in the management of delirium, and 86.5% (n=128) reported using at least one non-pharmacological measure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deficiencies in knowledge and management of delirium were evident in healthcare workers. The instrument had optimal content validation but unsatisfactory construct validation. Emphasizing the importance of doing a psychometric analysis with individuals prior to applying the instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":"35 166, oct.-dic.","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v35i166.722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: delirium is a prevalent syndrome in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the knowledge, attitudes and practices about delirium among medical professionals in a tertiary referral hospital, as well as to evaluate the validity of the instrument created for this purpose.

Methods: A 3 phase cross sectional study was carried out: 1- content validation, 2- application of the instrument and 3- Construct validation.

Results: After satisfactory content validation, the instrument was applied to 148 participants. Regarding knowledge about delirium, there was an average of 57.8% correct answers (95% CI 52.5-63.1) with no significant difference between attending physicians, residents and final year medical students. 25% (n=37) reported using the Confusion Assessment Method, 31.1% (n=46) reported feeling confident in the use of antipsychotics in the management of delirium, and 86.5% (n=128) reported using at least one non-pharmacological measure.

Conclusions: Deficiencies in knowledge and management of delirium were evident in healthcare workers. The instrument had optimal content validation but unsatisfactory construct validation. Emphasizing the importance of doing a psychometric analysis with individuals prior to applying the instrument.

卡耶塔诺埃雷迪亚医院谵妄诊断和管理的知识、态度和实践。
简介:谵妄是临床实践中常见的一种综合征。调查的目的是查明知识、态度和做法delirium医务人员在一家医院的第三级,以及评估为此创造工具的有效性。方法:进行了一项横向研究3阶段:(1)验证内容,(2)和3)验证constructo文书的执行情况。结果:在内容验证成功后,该工具应用于148名参与者。关于谵妄的知识,平均准确率为57.8% (95% CI 52.5 - 63.1),助理医生、住院医生和研究生之间没有显著差异。25% (n=37)表示使用混淆评估方法,31.1% (n=46)表示对使用抗精神病药物治疗谵妄有信心,86.5% (n=128)表示至少使用了一种非药物措施。结论:医务人员对谵妄的认识和管理存在缺陷。该仪器具有最佳的内容验证,但结构验证不令人满意。强调了在使用该工具之前对个人进行心理测量分析的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信