Grethel Díaz-Vargas, Abigail Quiñones-Condezo, Karlos Acurio-Ortiz, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Tulio Bertorini, Martin Arévalo-Flores, Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier, Carlos Orellano
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding diagnosis and management of delirium at the Cayetano Heredia Hospital","authors":"Grethel Díaz-Vargas, Abigail Quiñones-Condezo, Karlos Acurio-Ortiz, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Tulio Bertorini, Martin Arévalo-Flores, Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier, Carlos Orellano","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v35i166.722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>delirium is a prevalent syndrome in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the knowledge, attitudes and practices about delirium among medical professionals in a tertiary referral hospital, as well as to evaluate the validity of the instrument created for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3 phase cross sectional study was carried out: 1- content validation, 2- application of the instrument and 3- Construct validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After satisfactory content validation, the instrument was applied to 148 participants. Regarding knowledge about delirium, there was an average of 57.8% correct answers (95% CI 52.5-63.1) with no significant difference between attending physicians, residents and final year medical students. 25% (n=37) reported using the Confusion Assessment Method, 31.1% (n=46) reported feeling confident in the use of antipsychotics in the management of delirium, and 86.5% (n=128) reported using at least one non-pharmacological measure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deficiencies in knowledge and management of delirium were evident in healthcare workers. The instrument had optimal content validation but unsatisfactory construct validation. Emphasizing the importance of doing a psychometric analysis with individuals prior to applying the instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":"35 166, oct.-dic.","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v35i166.722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: delirium is a prevalent syndrome in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to identify the knowledge, attitudes and practices about delirium among medical professionals in a tertiary referral hospital, as well as to evaluate the validity of the instrument created for this purpose.
Methods: A 3 phase cross sectional study was carried out: 1- content validation, 2- application of the instrument and 3- Construct validation.
Results: After satisfactory content validation, the instrument was applied to 148 participants. Regarding knowledge about delirium, there was an average of 57.8% correct answers (95% CI 52.5-63.1) with no significant difference between attending physicians, residents and final year medical students. 25% (n=37) reported using the Confusion Assessment Method, 31.1% (n=46) reported feeling confident in the use of antipsychotics in the management of delirium, and 86.5% (n=128) reported using at least one non-pharmacological measure.
Conclusions: Deficiencies in knowledge and management of delirium were evident in healthcare workers. The instrument had optimal content validation but unsatisfactory construct validation. Emphasizing the importance of doing a psychometric analysis with individuals prior to applying the instrument.