Brigid S Mumford, Lara Lemon, John Harris, Lauren E Giugale
{"title":"Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Versus First Vaginal Delivery.","authors":"Brigid S Mumford, Lara Lemon, John Harris, Lauren E Giugale","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Modern data regarding the relationship between vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are minimal with mixed results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine if VBAC is associated with an increased risk of OASIs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of liveborn deliveries from 2018 to 2022 within a large, multihospital academic health system. The primary outcome was the proportion of OASIs compared between patients who underwent a first vaginal delivery (primiparous vaginal delivery group) versus patients who underwent a first VBAC (VBAC group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17,044 patients were included. A total of 16,208 had a primiparous vaginal delivery and 836 underwent VBAC. Vaginal birth after cesarean patients were older (29.9 vs 27.0 years, P < 0.01), more likely to self-identify as Black or Asian race (26.1% vs 18.0%, P < 0.01), and had lower maternal weight (182.7 vs 187.2 lbs, P < 0.01). The proportion of OASIs was significantly higher in the VBAC group (6.9% vs 5.1%, P = 0.02). Vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries were more common in the VBAC group (7.7% vs 5.4%, P < 0.01).On multivariable logistic regression, VBAC was not significantly associated with OASIS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.36, P = 0.95). Operative vaginal delivery (OR = 6.44, CI = 5.51-7.52, P < 0.01), older maternal age (OR = 1.05, CI = 1.03-1.07), and Asian race (OR 2.62, CI = 2.10-3.26) demonstrated increased odds of OASIs. Patients who identified as Black demonstrated lower odds of OASIs (OR = 0.68, CI = 0.50-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there was a greater proportion of OASIs in the VBAC group compared to the primiparous vaginal delivery group, VBAC was not an independent risk factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Modern data regarding the relationship between vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are minimal with mixed results.
Objective: The aim of the study was to determine if VBAC is associated with an increased risk of OASIs.
Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of liveborn deliveries from 2018 to 2022 within a large, multihospital academic health system. The primary outcome was the proportion of OASIs compared between patients who underwent a first vaginal delivery (primiparous vaginal delivery group) versus patients who underwent a first VBAC (VBAC group).
Results: A total of 17,044 patients were included. A total of 16,208 had a primiparous vaginal delivery and 836 underwent VBAC. Vaginal birth after cesarean patients were older (29.9 vs 27.0 years, P < 0.01), more likely to self-identify as Black or Asian race (26.1% vs 18.0%, P < 0.01), and had lower maternal weight (182.7 vs 187.2 lbs, P < 0.01). The proportion of OASIs was significantly higher in the VBAC group (6.9% vs 5.1%, P = 0.02). Vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries were more common in the VBAC group (7.7% vs 5.4%, P < 0.01).On multivariable logistic regression, VBAC was not significantly associated with OASIS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.36, P = 0.95). Operative vaginal delivery (OR = 6.44, CI = 5.51-7.52, P < 0.01), older maternal age (OR = 1.05, CI = 1.03-1.07), and Asian race (OR 2.62, CI = 2.10-3.26) demonstrated increased odds of OASIs. Patients who identified as Black demonstrated lower odds of OASIs (OR = 0.68, CI = 0.50-0.93).
Conclusions: While there was a greater proportion of OASIs in the VBAC group compared to the primiparous vaginal delivery group, VBAC was not an independent risk factor.
重要性:关于剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)和产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)之间关系的现代数据很少,结果好坏参半。目的:该研究的目的是确定VBAC是否与OASIs风险增加有关。研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是一个大型多医院学术卫生系统中2018年至2022年的活产分娩。主要结局是比较首次阴道分娩(阴道分娩组)和首次VBAC (VBAC组)患者之间的OASIs比例。结果:共纳入患者17044例。共有16,208人进行了阴道分娩,836人进行了VBAC。剖宫产后阴道分娩的患者年龄较大(29.9 vs 27.0岁,P < 0.01),自我认同为黑人或亚洲种族的可能性较大(26.1% vs 18.0%, P < 0.01),母亲体重较低(182.7 vs 187.2 lbs, P < 0.01)。VBAC组OASIs比例显著高于对照组(6.9% vs 5.1%, P = 0.02)。真空辅助阴道分娩在VBAC组更为常见(7.7% vs 5.4%, P < 0.01)。在多变量logistic回归中,VBAC与OASIS无显著相关(比值比[OR] = 1.01, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.75-1.36, P = 0.95)。阴道手术分娩(OR = 6.44, CI = 5.51 ~ 7.52, P < 0.01)、产妇年龄较大(OR = 1.05, CI = 1.03 ~ 1.07)、亚洲种族(OR 2.62, CI = 2.10 ~ 3.26)均增加了OASIs的发生几率。确诊为Black的患者出现OASIs的几率较低(OR = 0.68, CI = 0.50-0.93)。结论:虽然VBAC组的OASIs比例高于阴道初产组,但VBAC并不是一个独立的危险因素。