A Systematic Review of Evaluated Labor Market Initiatives Addressing Precarious Employment: Findings and Public Health Implications.

0 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Virginia Gunn, Nuria Matilla-Santander, Bertina Kreshpaj, Emilia F Vignola, David H Wegman, Christer Hogstedt, Theo Bodin, Emily Q Ahonen, Sherry Baron, Carles Muntaner, Patricia O'Campo, Wayne Lewchuk, Maria Albin, Kathryn Badarin, Carin Håkansta
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Evaluated Labor Market Initiatives Addressing Precarious Employment: Findings and Public Health Implications.","authors":"Virginia Gunn, Nuria Matilla-Santander, Bertina Kreshpaj, Emilia F Vignola, David H Wegman, Christer Hogstedt, Theo Bodin, Emily Q Ahonen, Sherry Baron, Carles Muntaner, Patricia O'Campo, Wayne Lewchuk, Maria Albin, Kathryn Badarin, Carin Håkansta","doi":"10.1177/27551938241310120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Precarious employment (PE) is a major determinant of population health and contributor to health and social inequities. The purpose of this article is to synthesize and critically appraise available evidence on labor market initiatives addressing PE identified through a systematic review. Of the 21 initiatives reviewed, grouped into four categories-labor market policies, legislation, and reforms; union strategies; apprenticeships and other youth programs; social protection programs-10 showed consistently positive outcomes and 11 a combination of negative, mixed, or inconclusive outcomes. In addition to reviewing the key findings, we discuss public health implications and recommendations related to PE and the implementation and evaluation of initiatives. Given the wide diversity of initiatives, implementation approaches, evaluation methods, and socioeconomic and historical contexts characterizing the labor markets of the countries studied, we refrain from making recommendations regarding the most effective initiatives to address PE. Instead, we discuss several implications concerning the four types of initiatives to further support those searching for solutions to address PE. We strongly recommend tailoring adopted initiatives to local contexts to match a country's specific PE problems and unique labor market and socioeconomic context.</p>","PeriodicalId":73479,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","volume":" ","pages":"27551938241310120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social determinants of health and health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938241310120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precarious employment (PE) is a major determinant of population health and contributor to health and social inequities. The purpose of this article is to synthesize and critically appraise available evidence on labor market initiatives addressing PE identified through a systematic review. Of the 21 initiatives reviewed, grouped into four categories-labor market policies, legislation, and reforms; union strategies; apprenticeships and other youth programs; social protection programs-10 showed consistently positive outcomes and 11 a combination of negative, mixed, or inconclusive outcomes. In addition to reviewing the key findings, we discuss public health implications and recommendations related to PE and the implementation and evaluation of initiatives. Given the wide diversity of initiatives, implementation approaches, evaluation methods, and socioeconomic and historical contexts characterizing the labor markets of the countries studied, we refrain from making recommendations regarding the most effective initiatives to address PE. Instead, we discuss several implications concerning the four types of initiatives to further support those searching for solutions to address PE. We strongly recommend tailoring adopted initiatives to local contexts to match a country's specific PE problems and unique labor market and socioeconomic context.

对解决不稳定就业的评估劳动力市场举措的系统回顾:调查结果和公共卫生影响。
不稳定就业是人口健康的一个主要决定因素,也是造成健康和社会不平等的因素。本文的目的是综合和批判性地评估通过系统审查确定的劳动力市场举措解决PE的现有证据。在审查的21项举措中,分为四类:劳动力市场政策、立法和改革;联盟策略;学徒制和其他青年项目;社会保障项目10显示出持续的积极结果,11显示出消极、好坏参半或不确定的结果。除了审查主要调查结果外,我们还讨论了与体育相关的公共卫生影响和建议以及倡议的实施和评价。鉴于所研究国家的举措、实施方法、评估方法以及劳动力市场特征的社会经济和历史背景的广泛多样性,我们不就解决PE的最有效举措提出建议。相反,我们讨论了关于四种类型的倡议的几个含义,以进一步支持那些寻求解决PE的解决方案的人。我们强烈建议根据各国具体的体育问题、独特的劳动力市场和社会经济背景,量身定制已采纳的举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信