Effect of epinephrine administration interval on cerebral perfusion in a porcine cardiac arrest model.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ki Hong Kim, Ki Jeong Hong, Sang Do Shin, Kyoung Jun Song, Yoonjic Kim, Dong Hyun Choi, Jeong Ho Park, Tae Han Kim, Joo Jeong, Young Sun Ro, Hyun Jeong Kang
{"title":"Effect of epinephrine administration interval on cerebral perfusion in a porcine cardiac arrest model.","authors":"Ki Hong Kim, Ki Jeong Hong, Sang Do Shin, Kyoung Jun Song, Yoonjic Kim, Dong Hyun Choi, Jeong Ho Park, Tae Han Kim, Joo Jeong, Young Sun Ro, Hyun Jeong Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The recommended epinephrine administration interval during CPR is between 3 and 5 min. However, the optimal interval for improving cerebral perfusion remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of epinephrine administration interval of 3 min or 5 min on cerebral perfusion pressure (CEPP) and cortical cerebral blood flow (CCBF) in a porcine cardiac arrest model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental model of ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest was conducted using 26 pigs, randomised into 3-min and 5-min interval groups. Six minutes after VF induction, all pigs received 4 min of chest compressions, followed by 20 min of advanced cardiovascular life support, including defibrillation and intravenous epinephrine administration. CEPP and CCBF were measured simultaneously throughout the experiment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the experimental groups comprised 13 pigs. The 3-min group showed higher CEPP compared with the 5-min group in between 16 min and 20 min, 26 min and 30 min from VF induction: mean (95 % Confidence intervals) 26.8 (4.7-49.0) mmHg for 3-min group and 11.3 (-5.7-28.3) mmHg for 5-min group in 18 to 20 min from VF induction, which showed biggest difference. No significant difference was observed in CCBF between the 3-min and 5-min groups throughout the resuscitation phase (from the first epinephrine administration): The relative ratios 6 to 8 min after VF induction ranged from 0.21 to 0.86 in the 3-min group, and 0.35 to 0.77 in the 5-min group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3-min epinephrine administration interval showed a higher CEPP compared with the 5-min interval. No significant differences were found in the CCBF between the two interval groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"81-87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The recommended epinephrine administration interval during CPR is between 3 and 5 min. However, the optimal interval for improving cerebral perfusion remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of epinephrine administration interval of 3 min or 5 min on cerebral perfusion pressure (CEPP) and cortical cerebral blood flow (CCBF) in a porcine cardiac arrest model.

Methods: An experimental model of ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest was conducted using 26 pigs, randomised into 3-min and 5-min interval groups. Six minutes after VF induction, all pigs received 4 min of chest compressions, followed by 20 min of advanced cardiovascular life support, including defibrillation and intravenous epinephrine administration. CEPP and CCBF were measured simultaneously throughout the experiment.

Results: Each of the experimental groups comprised 13 pigs. The 3-min group showed higher CEPP compared with the 5-min group in between 16 min and 20 min, 26 min and 30 min from VF induction: mean (95 % Confidence intervals) 26.8 (4.7-49.0) mmHg for 3-min group and 11.3 (-5.7-28.3) mmHg for 5-min group in 18 to 20 min from VF induction, which showed biggest difference. No significant difference was observed in CCBF between the 3-min and 5-min groups throughout the resuscitation phase (from the first epinephrine administration): The relative ratios 6 to 8 min after VF induction ranged from 0.21 to 0.86 in the 3-min group, and 0.35 to 0.77 in the 5-min group.

Conclusion: The 3-min epinephrine administration interval showed a higher CEPP compared with the 5-min interval. No significant differences were found in the CCBF between the two interval groups.

肾上腺素给药间隔时间对猪心脏骤停模型脑灌注的影响。
目的:心肺复苏术中推荐的肾上腺素给药间隔时间为3 - 5分钟。然而,改善脑灌注的最佳间隔时间仍存在争议。本研究旨在评价肾上腺素给药间隔3 min或5 min对猪心脏骤停模型脑灌注压(CEPP)和脑皮质血流量(CCBF)的影响。方法:将26头猪随机分为间隔时间3 min和5 min两组,建立心室颤动(VF)心脏骤停实验模型。VF诱导6分钟后,所有猪接受4分钟胸外按压,随后进行20分钟高级心血管生命支持,包括除颤和静脉肾上腺素给药。在整个实验过程中同时测量CEPP和CCBF。结果:每组13头猪。在VF诱导后16 ~ 20分钟、26 ~ 30分钟,3 min组的CEPP高于5 min组:VF诱导后18 ~ 20分钟,3 min组的平均(95%置信区间)为26.8 (4.7 ~ 49.0)mmHg, 5 min组的平均(-5.7 ~ 28.3)mmHg,差异最大。在整个复苏阶段(从第一次肾上腺素给药开始),3分钟组和5分钟组的CCBF无显著差异:在VF诱导后6 ~ 8分钟,3分钟组的相对比值为0.21 ~ 0.86,5分钟组的相对比值为0.35 ~ 0.77。结论:3 min肾上腺素给药间隔较5 min肾上腺素给药间隔有较高的CEPP。两组间期CCBF无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信