Outdoor experiences and outdoor-based activities and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic scoping review.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Anders O Aaby, Samuel D Williamson, Louise S Madsen, Thomas Maribo, Sophie L Ravn
{"title":"Outdoor experiences and outdoor-based activities and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic scoping review.","authors":"Anders O Aaby, Samuel D Williamson, Louise S Madsen, Thomas Maribo, Sophie L Ravn","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v57.40705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic scoping review.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to identify and synthesize empirical studies exploring outdoor experiences, activities, and interventions in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were performed in 7 bibliometric databases. Unique records were independently screened by 2 authors. Peer-reviewed studies on outdoor experiences, activities, or interventions in adults with SCI were included. This was supplemented by Google Scholar searches and citation tracking. Data from included studies were extracted and analysed in a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 studies were included. Study findings were catalogued into 9 categories and grouped into 3 themes. Theme 1 covered findings related to the experiences and outcomes of outdoor recreational activities and nature exposure. Theme 2 covered findings on facilitators and barriers related to outdoor recreational activities and nature exposure. Theme 3 covered findings related to outdoor testing of equipment and tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People with SCI mainly report positive experiences from engaging with the natural environment and pursuing outdoor activities, but also experienced a range of barriers that need to be considered in both research and clinical practice. Future studies need to explore the effects of outdoor-based rehabilitation, also employing high-quality methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"57 ","pages":"jrm40705"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.40705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Systematic scoping review.

Objectives: The aim was to identify and synthesize empirical studies exploring outdoor experiences, activities, and interventions in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: Systematic searches were performed in 7 bibliometric databases. Unique records were independently screened by 2 authors. Peer-reviewed studies on outdoor experiences, activities, or interventions in adults with SCI were included. This was supplemented by Google Scholar searches and citation tracking. Data from included studies were extracted and analysed in a narrative synthesis.

Results: A total of 89 studies were included. Study findings were catalogued into 9 categories and grouped into 3 themes. Theme 1 covered findings related to the experiences and outcomes of outdoor recreational activities and nature exposure. Theme 2 covered findings on facilitators and barriers related to outdoor recreational activities and nature exposure. Theme 3 covered findings related to outdoor testing of equipment and tools.

Conclusion: People with SCI mainly report positive experiences from engaging with the natural environment and pursuing outdoor activities, but also experienced a range of barriers that need to be considered in both research and clinical practice. Future studies need to explore the effects of outdoor-based rehabilitation, also employing high-quality methods.

脊髓损伤患者的户外体验、户外活动和干预措施:一项系统的范围评估。
研究设计:系统的范围评估。目的:目的是识别和综合探索户外经历、活动和干预措施对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的实证研究。方法:系统检索7个文献计量数据库。独特的记录由2位作者独立筛选。包括了同行评议的关于脊髓损伤成人的户外经历、活动或干预措施的研究。这是b谷歌学者搜索和引文跟踪的补充。从纳入的研究中提取数据并在叙事综合中进行分析。结果:共纳入89项研究。研究结果被分为9类,并分为3个主题。主题1涉及与户外娱乐活动和自然接触的经历和结果有关的研究结果。主题2涉及与户外娱乐活动和自然接触有关的促进因素和障碍的调查结果。主题3涉及与设备和工具的户外测试有关的调查结果。结论:SCI患者主要报告了与自然环境接触和从事户外活动的积极体验,但也经历了一系列在研究和临床实践中需要考虑的障碍。未来的研究需要探索户外康复的效果,并采用高质量的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信