Prevalence and associated factor of verbal abuse against nurses: A systematic review

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Qian Wang MS, Yu-Pei Yang MS, Zhi-Ying Li MS, Fu-Yang Yu MS, Yang He MS, Meixian Zhang MD, PhD, Chengwen Luo PhD, Tao-Hsin Tung PhD, Hai-Xiao Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Prevalence and associated factor of verbal abuse against nurses: A systematic review","authors":"Qian Wang MS,&nbsp;Yu-Pei Yang MS,&nbsp;Zhi-Ying Li MS,&nbsp;Fu-Yang Yu MS,&nbsp;Yang He MS,&nbsp;Meixian Zhang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Chengwen Luo PhD,&nbsp;Tao-Hsin Tung PhD,&nbsp;Hai-Xiao Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/inr.13095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Nurses who experience verbal abuse often report negative emotions, which can affect their work status and nurse–patient relationship. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has summarized the prevalence of verbal abuse among nurses by different perpetrators and related risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This review aimed to synthesize the prevalence of verbal abuse among nurses and identify the most common sources and related risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception to 15 October 2024, and observational studies reporting the prevalence of verbal abuse among nurses were selected. In this systematic review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Methodological quality was appraised using a revised version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and the STATA software was used for meta-analysis; PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022385401.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The search identified 458 records, of which 45 met the inclusion criteria. The overall prevalence of verbal abuse was estimated at 67% (95% CI: 61–72). Verbally abused nurses reported patients’ relatives, friends (48%, 95% CI: 42–55), and physicians (39%, 95% CI: 20–58) as the main perpetrators of verbal abuse. Personal factors, work area, and work characteristics were the main factors related to verbal abuse among nurses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The overall prevalence of verbal abuse among nurses was more than 65%, especially in the emergency department, and South or Southeast Asian countries had a significantly lower prevalence of verbal abuse than other countries. Physicians and patients’ relatives were the main sources of verbal abuse. Hospital administrators should prevent various effects of verbal abuse on nurses’ physical and mental health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for nursing and health policy</h3>\n \n <p>Developing safe workplaces and effective interventions to protect nurses is essential. Supervisors and institutions should thoroughly monitor verbal abuse. Additionally, organizations need to focus on preventive measures and provide the necessary administrative, legal, and psychological support to nurses who are exposed to verbal abuse to ensure nursing care sustainability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54931,"journal":{"name":"International Nursing Review","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Nursing Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inr.13095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nurses who experience verbal abuse often report negative emotions, which can affect their work status and nurse–patient relationship. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has summarized the prevalence of verbal abuse among nurses by different perpetrators and related risk factors.

Aim

This review aimed to synthesize the prevalence of verbal abuse among nurses and identify the most common sources and related risk factors.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception to 15 October 2024, and observational studies reporting the prevalence of verbal abuse among nurses were selected. In this systematic review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Methodological quality was appraised using a revised version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and the STATA software was used for meta-analysis; PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022385401.

Results

The search identified 458 records, of which 45 met the inclusion criteria. The overall prevalence of verbal abuse was estimated at 67% (95% CI: 61–72). Verbally abused nurses reported patients’ relatives, friends (48%, 95% CI: 42–55), and physicians (39%, 95% CI: 20–58) as the main perpetrators of verbal abuse. Personal factors, work area, and work characteristics were the main factors related to verbal abuse among nurses.

Conclusions

The overall prevalence of verbal abuse among nurses was more than 65%, especially in the emergency department, and South or Southeast Asian countries had a significantly lower prevalence of verbal abuse than other countries. Physicians and patients’ relatives were the main sources of verbal abuse. Hospital administrators should prevent various effects of verbal abuse on nurses’ physical and mental health.

Implications for nursing and health policy

Developing safe workplaces and effective interventions to protect nurses is essential. Supervisors and institutions should thoroughly monitor verbal abuse. Additionally, organizations need to focus on preventive measures and provide the necessary administrative, legal, and psychological support to nurses who are exposed to verbal abuse to ensure nursing care sustainability.

护士言语虐待的流行及相关因素:一项系统回顾。
背景:经历过言语虐待的护士通常会报告负面情绪,这会影响他们的工作状态和护患关系。然而,据我们所知,还没有研究总结了护士中不同施暴者的言语虐待发生率及其相关风险因素。目的:本综述旨在综合护士言语虐待的流行情况,确定最常见的言语虐待来源和相关危险因素。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane Library电子数据库,检索时间自成立至2024年10月15日,选取报告护士言语虐待发生率的观察性研究。在本系统评价中,遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。采用修订后的纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表对方法学质量进行评价,并使用STATA软件进行meta分析;普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42022385401。结果:检索到458条记录,其中45条符合纳入标准。言语虐待的总体发生率估计为67% (95% CI: 61-72)。受言语虐待的护士报告患者的亲属、朋友(48%,95% CI: 42-55)和医生(39%,95% CI: 20-58)是言语虐待的主要肇事者。个人因素、工作区域和工作特征是影响护士言语虐待的主要因素。结论:护士言语虐待的总体发生率超过65%,特别是在急诊科,南亚或东南亚国家的护士言语虐待发生率明显低于其他国家。医生和患者亲属是言语虐待的主要来源。医院管理者应防止言语虐待对护士身心健康的各种影响。对护理和卫生政策的影响:制定安全的工作场所和有效的干预措施以保护护士至关重要。主管和机构应该彻底监控言语虐待。此外,组织需要关注预防措施,并为遭受言语虐待的护士提供必要的行政、法律和心理支持,以确保护理的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Nursing Review is a key resource for nurses world-wide. Articles are encouraged that reflect the ICN"s five key values: flexibility, inclusiveness, partnership, achievement and visionary leadership. Authors are encouraged to identify the relevance of local issues for the global community and to describe their work and to document their experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信