Finding a balance: Using a pre-post test to evaluate the effectiveness of scenario based learning using a blended approach among undergraduate nursing students.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Lisa Rogers, Aoife MacCormac
{"title":"Finding a balance: Using a pre-post test to evaluate the effectiveness of scenario based learning using a blended approach among undergraduate nursing students.","authors":"Lisa Rogers, Aoife MacCormac","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While undergraduate education aims to provide student nurses with a level of competence for independent practice, criticisms exist surrounding the ability of these programmes to adequately prepare graduates for the clinical skills required to optimise care. Adopting virtual simulations into nursing curricula may support greater clinical preparedness due to the student-driven nature of this approach. However, learning is also cited as a social experience requiring teacher-student interaction. Therefore, a challenge exists to develop teaching strategies that balance interactive learning while also ensuring students achieve relevant competencies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Using scenario-based learning in a blended environment, this research evaluates the impact of different teaching modalities (in-person vs virtual patient case simulations) on undergraduate student nurses' perceived learning gains and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A pre and post-test design.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eligible participants were Irish nursing students enrolled in a 5-credit European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) module (Autumn 2023 academic term) focusing on the care of persons with altered cardiovascular function at a large, urban university.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey investigated the impact of these different teaching modalities on students' perceived learning and self-efficacy. Scales were adapted from previous research and non-parametric tests explored changes in perceptions over time. Thematic analysis of open-text responses provided greater insight into student experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 57 % (n = 97) at baseline and 23 % (n = 39) at follow up. Students' perceptions of their learning gains and self-efficacy were scored positively for both in-person and virtual scenario-based teaching modalities. However, following participation with virtual simulation, meaningful, positive improvements to students' understanding, attitudes, and self-efficacy were identified. Three key themes were generated from participants' open-ended survey responses which revealed the core features of both teaching modalities and students' desire to further integrate more virtual activities into undergraduate curricula: 1) In-person accessibility and interactivity matters: 2) Virtual simulations: bringing content to life: 3) Online learning: the path forward.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By combining the advantages of in-person and online learning platforms, a blended approach can close the theory to practice gap and support diverse student cohorts to succeed within nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"106573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While undergraduate education aims to provide student nurses with a level of competence for independent practice, criticisms exist surrounding the ability of these programmes to adequately prepare graduates for the clinical skills required to optimise care. Adopting virtual simulations into nursing curricula may support greater clinical preparedness due to the student-driven nature of this approach. However, learning is also cited as a social experience requiring teacher-student interaction. Therefore, a challenge exists to develop teaching strategies that balance interactive learning while also ensuring students achieve relevant competencies.

Aim: Using scenario-based learning in a blended environment, this research evaluates the impact of different teaching modalities (in-person vs virtual patient case simulations) on undergraduate student nurses' perceived learning gains and self-efficacy.

Design: A pre and post-test design.

Participants: Eligible participants were Irish nursing students enrolled in a 5-credit European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) module (Autumn 2023 academic term) focusing on the care of persons with altered cardiovascular function at a large, urban university.

Methods: An online survey investigated the impact of these different teaching modalities on students' perceived learning and self-efficacy. Scales were adapted from previous research and non-parametric tests explored changes in perceptions over time. Thematic analysis of open-text responses provided greater insight into student experiences.

Results: The response rate was 57 % (n = 97) at baseline and 23 % (n = 39) at follow up. Students' perceptions of their learning gains and self-efficacy were scored positively for both in-person and virtual scenario-based teaching modalities. However, following participation with virtual simulation, meaningful, positive improvements to students' understanding, attitudes, and self-efficacy were identified. Three key themes were generated from participants' open-ended survey responses which revealed the core features of both teaching modalities and students' desire to further integrate more virtual activities into undergraduate curricula: 1) In-person accessibility and interactivity matters: 2) Virtual simulations: bringing content to life: 3) Online learning: the path forward.

Conclusion: By combining the advantages of in-person and online learning platforms, a blended approach can close the theory to practice gap and support diverse student cohorts to succeed within nursing education.

寻找平衡:在本科护理学生中使用混合方法,使用前后测试来评估基于场景的学习的有效性。
背景:虽然本科教育旨在为学生护士提供独立实践的能力水平,但围绕这些课程的能力存在批评,以充分准备毕业生优化护理所需的临床技能。由于这种方法的学生驱动性质,在护理课程中采用虚拟模拟可以支持更大的临床准备。然而,学习也被认为是一种需要师生互动的社会体验。因此,如何制定既能平衡互动学习又能确保学生获得相关能力的教学策略是一个挑战。目的:在混合环境中使用基于场景的学习,本研究评估了不同教学模式(面对面与虚拟病例模拟)对本科生护士感知学习收益和自我效能的影响。设计:测试前后设计。参与者:符合条件的参与者是在一所大型城市大学就读5学分欧洲学分转换系统(ECTS)模块(2023年秋季学期)的爱尔兰护理学生,该模块侧重于心血管功能改变者的护理。方法:采用网络调查的方法,调查不同教学方式对学生学习感知和自我效能感的影响。量表改编自以前的研究,非参数测试探索了随着时间的推移观念的变化。对开放文本回答的专题分析提供了对学生体验的更深入的了解。结果:基线时有效率为57% (n = 97),随访时有效率为23% (n = 39)。在面对面教学和基于虚拟场景的教学模式下,学生对自己的学习收获和自我效能感的感知得分均为正。然而,参与虚拟模拟后,学生的理解、态度和自我效能感得到了有意义的积极改善。从参与者的开放式调查反馈中产生了三个关键主题,这些主题揭示了教学模式和学生希望进一步将更多虚拟活动融入本科课程的核心特征:1)面对面的可访问性和互动性问题;2)虚拟模拟:将内容带入生活;3)在线学习:前进的道路。结论:通过结合面对面和在线学习平台的优势,混合方法可以缩小理论与实践的差距,支持不同学生群体在护理教育中取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信