Barriers and drivers to exclusive breastfeeding in Kyrgyzstan: a qualitative study with mothers and health workers.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Cath Jackson, Marina Duishenkulova, Nurila Altymysheva, Jyldyz Artykbaeva, Raisa Asylbasheva, Eleonora Jumalieva, Anastasia Koylyu, Sian Lickess, Tursun Mamyrbaeva, Veerle Snijders, Julianne Williams, Tiina Likki
{"title":"Barriers and drivers to exclusive breastfeeding in Kyrgyzstan: a qualitative study with mothers and health workers.","authors":"Cath Jackson, Marina Duishenkulova, Nurila Altymysheva, Jyldyz Artykbaeva, Raisa Asylbasheva, Eleonora Jumalieva, Anastasia Koylyu, Sian Lickess, Tursun Mamyrbaeva, Veerle Snijders, Julianne Williams, Tiina Likki","doi":"10.1186/s13006-024-00688-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The WHO/UNICEF global nutrition target for exclusive breastfeeding for six months is at least 70% of infants by 2030. However, global prevalence rates are 48% with variations between countries and within regions. Kyrgyzstan has consistently high early breastfeeding initiation rates, yet exclusive breastfeeding for six months is 46%. This qualitative study addressed two research questions: (1) What are the barriers and drivers for mothers to exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months? (2) What are the barriers and drivers for health workers in primary care facilities to supporting exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study took place from April to June 2023 in five sites (mix of urban and rural). Ten focus group discussions with 40 primary care health workers and 20 in-depth interviews with mothers of a child currently aged 6-12 months who initiated breastfeeding with this child were conducted. Mothers were purposively selected to represent four groups of infant feeding practices in the first six months: (1) exclusive breastfeeding, (2) breastfeeding alongside other fluids/solids, (3) breastfeeding alongside infant formula, (4) breastfeeding followed by switching to formula only. The Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was the underpinning theoretical framework. Data were analysed using the Framework approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study uncovered important misperceptions amongst mothers who were not exclusively breastfeeding (groups 2-4). These existed alongside a perceived inability to resolve physical challenges of breastfeeding and social pressure to supplement breastmilk with fluids/solids or formula. Half of all mothers felt uncomfortable breastfeeding in public. Health workers were recommending and supporting women with exclusive breastfeeding during multiple antenatal and postnatal interactions during the initial six months. They were knowledgeable and motivated to do this. Moreover, they felt well supported with training, resources, and legislation with just a few mentioning workplace time or space challenges. Very few doctors appeared to currently be meeting with formula industry representatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This theory-informed qualitative study focusing on mother and health worker perspectives provided important insights into the individual and contextual barriers and drivers to exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months in Kyrgyzstan. These insights have informed recommendations for tailored interventions for both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00688-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The WHO/UNICEF global nutrition target for exclusive breastfeeding for six months is at least 70% of infants by 2030. However, global prevalence rates are 48% with variations between countries and within regions. Kyrgyzstan has consistently high early breastfeeding initiation rates, yet exclusive breastfeeding for six months is 46%. This qualitative study addressed two research questions: (1) What are the barriers and drivers for mothers to exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months? (2) What are the barriers and drivers for health workers in primary care facilities to supporting exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months?

Methods: The study took place from April to June 2023 in five sites (mix of urban and rural). Ten focus group discussions with 40 primary care health workers and 20 in-depth interviews with mothers of a child currently aged 6-12 months who initiated breastfeeding with this child were conducted. Mothers were purposively selected to represent four groups of infant feeding practices in the first six months: (1) exclusive breastfeeding, (2) breastfeeding alongside other fluids/solids, (3) breastfeeding alongside infant formula, (4) breastfeeding followed by switching to formula only. The Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was the underpinning theoretical framework. Data were analysed using the Framework approach.

Results: The study uncovered important misperceptions amongst mothers who were not exclusively breastfeeding (groups 2-4). These existed alongside a perceived inability to resolve physical challenges of breastfeeding and social pressure to supplement breastmilk with fluids/solids or formula. Half of all mothers felt uncomfortable breastfeeding in public. Health workers were recommending and supporting women with exclusive breastfeeding during multiple antenatal and postnatal interactions during the initial six months. They were knowledgeable and motivated to do this. Moreover, they felt well supported with training, resources, and legislation with just a few mentioning workplace time or space challenges. Very few doctors appeared to currently be meeting with formula industry representatives.

Conclusions: This theory-informed qualitative study focusing on mother and health worker perspectives provided important insights into the individual and contextual barriers and drivers to exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months in Kyrgyzstan. These insights have informed recommendations for tailored interventions for both groups.

吉尔吉斯斯坦纯母乳喂养的障碍和驱动因素:对母亲和卫生工作者的定性研究。
背景:世卫组织/联合国儿童基金会关于六个月纯母乳喂养的全球营养目标是到2030年至少为70%的婴儿提供母乳喂养。然而,全球患病率为48%,国家之间和区域内存在差异。吉尔吉斯斯坦的早期母乳喂养率一直很高,但6个月纯母乳喂养率为46%。本定性研究解决了两个研究问题:(1)母亲在头六个月纯母乳喂养的障碍和驱动因素是什么?(2)初级保健机构卫生工作者支持婴儿头六个月纯母乳喂养的障碍和驱动因素是什么?方法:研究于2023年4月至6月在五个地点(城市和农村混合)进行。与40名初级保健卫生工作者进行了10次焦点小组讨论,并与一名目前6-12个月大的儿童的母亲进行了20次深入访谈,这些母亲开始对该儿童进行母乳喂养。有目的地选择母亲代表头六个月的四组婴儿喂养方法:(1)纯母乳喂养,(2)与其他液体/固体母乳喂养,(3)与婴儿配方奶粉一起母乳喂养,(4)母乳喂养后仅改用配方奶粉。能力-机会-动机-行为(COM-B)模型是基础理论框架。使用框架方法分析数据。结果:该研究揭示了非纯母乳喂养母亲(2-4组)的重要误解。与此同时,人们还意识到无法解决母乳喂养的身体挑战,以及用液体/固体或配方奶补充母乳的社会压力。一半的母亲对在公共场合哺乳感到不舒服。卫生工作者建议并支持妇女在最初六个月的产前和产后多次互动中完全母乳喂养。他们知识渊博,有动力去做这件事。此外,他们觉得在培训、资源和立法方面得到了很好的支持,只有少数人提到了工作场所的时间或空间挑战。目前似乎很少有医生与配方奶粉行业代表会面。结论:这项基于理论的定性研究侧重于母亲和卫生工作者的观点,为吉尔吉斯斯坦前六个月纯母乳喂养的个人和背景障碍和驱动因素提供了重要见解。这些见解为针对这两个群体的量身定制的干预措施提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信