[Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a001028
Janna Sill, Katharina Silies, Angelika Schley, Steffen Fleischer, Martin Müller, Katrin Balzer
{"title":"[Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study].","authors":"Janna Sill, Katharina Silies, Angelika Schley, Steffen Fleischer, Martin Müller, Katrin Balzer","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a001028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study <b>Abstract:</b><i>Background:</i> The Covid-19 pandemic has put decisions regarding prioritization and rationing of care resources on the health policy agenda. The effects on the allocation of nursing resources in clinical practice are unclear. <i>Aim:</i> In order to derive implications for future pandemic situations, we analyzed the extent to which decisions were made about the distribution of resources in acute inpatient care and how bottlenecks were dealt with. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted semi-structured interviews with nursing staff (n = 16) and nursing team leaders (n = 10) in five acute-care clinics in Germany and analyzed them inductively using thematic framework analysis. <i>Results:</i> In acute inpatient care under pandemic conditions, prioritization and rationing decisions were made, such as the postponement or reduction of nursing measures, in order to overcome pandemic-specific challenges. These decisions affected certain patient groups and certain near- and distant-patient services, in particular fundamental care measures, such as support with personal hygiene and nutrition, as well as access to acute inpatient care. The decisions were made implicitly rather than according to evidence-based criteria. <i>Conclusions:</i> Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions were made during the pandemic. These decisions are similar to comparable decisions outside of the pandemic, particularly in terms of insufficient evidence base, and emphasize the need for empirically based decision criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions in acute care hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study Abstract:Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has put decisions regarding prioritization and rationing of care resources on the health policy agenda. The effects on the allocation of nursing resources in clinical practice are unclear. Aim: In order to derive implications for future pandemic situations, we analyzed the extent to which decisions were made about the distribution of resources in acute inpatient care and how bottlenecks were dealt with. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with nursing staff (n = 16) and nursing team leaders (n = 10) in five acute-care clinics in Germany and analyzed them inductively using thematic framework analysis. Results: In acute inpatient care under pandemic conditions, prioritization and rationing decisions were made, such as the postponement or reduction of nursing measures, in order to overcome pandemic-specific challenges. These decisions affected certain patient groups and certain near- and distant-patient services, in particular fundamental care measures, such as support with personal hygiene and nutrition, as well as access to acute inpatient care. The decisions were made implicitly rather than according to evidence-based criteria. Conclusions: Nursing prioritization and rationing decisions were made during the pandemic. These decisions are similar to comparable decisions outside of the pandemic, particularly in terms of insufficient evidence base, and emphasize the need for empirically based decision criteria.

[Covid-19大流行期间急诊医院护理优先级和定量决策:一项定性研究]。
摘要:背景:2019冠状病毒病(Covid-19)大流行已将护理资源的优先排序和配给决策提上卫生政策议程。在临床实践中对护理资源分配的影响尚不清楚。目的:为了得出对未来大流行情况的影响,我们分析了关于急性住院护理资源分配的决策程度以及如何处理瓶颈。方法:对德国5家急症诊所的护理人员(16名)和护理组长(10名)进行半结构化访谈,采用主题框架分析法进行归纳分析。结果:在大流行条件下的急性住院护理中,为了克服大流行特有的挑战,制定了优先级和定量决策,例如推迟或减少护理措施。这些决定影响到某些患者群体和某些近距离和远程患者服务,特别是基本护理措施,如个人卫生和营养支持,以及获得急性住院治疗。这些决定是隐式作出的,而不是根据循证标准作出的。结论:在大流行期间做出了护理优先级和配给决定。这些决定与大流行之外的类似决定类似,特别是在证据基础不足方面,并强调需要基于经验的决策标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信