{"title":"Medical imaging diagnosis of orthopedic prosthesis-associated infections: a narrative review.","authors":"Qing Gu, Ailing Gu, Jing Zhang, Yanli Zhou, Chentian Shen","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Orthopedic prostheses have become increasingly prevalent in clinical practice in recent years. However, orthopedic prosthesis-associated infections (OPAI) have emerged as a serious complication associated with their use. Due to the variety of orthopedic implant types and the atypical clinical manifestations of OPAI, it is easy to cause delayed diagnosis and affect the prognosis of patients. The objective of this paper is to: (I) identify the potential imaging tools available to diagnose OPAI; (II) summarize the mechanisms and features by which each imaging modality can or cannot identify infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All the published papers were obtained from PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection on 1 February 2024. The study included original articles and reviews published in English between 2014 and 2024. EndNote was used to remove duplicates. Two independent authors conducted a comprehensive review of the titles and abstracts of the remaining literature to assess their eligibility for inclusion. Following this initial screening, the authors meticulously analyzed the abstracts and examined the full texts to confirm their suitability for final inclusion.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>A total of 55 articles were finally included for this narrative review. This review mainly summarized and analyzed the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US), X-ray, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear medicine for OPAI, evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging technology, and tried to illuminate the future direction of diagnostic imaging methods development in this field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical imaging has gained multidisciplinary recognition in the diagnosis of OPAI. Currently, there is an urgent need to establish large-scale, multicenter research projects. It is worth noting the key role of nuclear medicine diagnostic techniques and their unique metabolic information in the diagnosis of OPAI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"947-961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Orthopedic prostheses have become increasingly prevalent in clinical practice in recent years. However, orthopedic prosthesis-associated infections (OPAI) have emerged as a serious complication associated with their use. Due to the variety of orthopedic implant types and the atypical clinical manifestations of OPAI, it is easy to cause delayed diagnosis and affect the prognosis of patients. The objective of this paper is to: (I) identify the potential imaging tools available to diagnose OPAI; (II) summarize the mechanisms and features by which each imaging modality can or cannot identify infection.
Methods: All the published papers were obtained from PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection on 1 February 2024. The study included original articles and reviews published in English between 2014 and 2024. EndNote was used to remove duplicates. Two independent authors conducted a comprehensive review of the titles and abstracts of the remaining literature to assess their eligibility for inclusion. Following this initial screening, the authors meticulously analyzed the abstracts and examined the full texts to confirm their suitability for final inclusion.
Key content and findings: A total of 55 articles were finally included for this narrative review. This review mainly summarized and analyzed the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US), X-ray, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear medicine for OPAI, evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging technology, and tried to illuminate the future direction of diagnostic imaging methods development in this field.
Conclusions: Medical imaging has gained multidisciplinary recognition in the diagnosis of OPAI. Currently, there is an urgent need to establish large-scale, multicenter research projects. It is worth noting the key role of nuclear medicine diagnostic techniques and their unique metabolic information in the diagnosis of OPAI.
背景与目的:近年来,骨科假体在临床实践中越来越普遍。然而,骨科假体相关感染(OPAI)已成为与使用假体相关的严重并发症。由于OPAI骨科植入物种类繁多,临床表现不典型,容易造成诊断延误,影响患者预后。本文的目的是:(1)确定可用于诊断OPAI的潜在成像工具;(II)总结每种成像方式能够或不能识别感染的机制和特征。方法:所有已发表的论文均来源于2024年2月1日的PubMed和Web of Science Core Collection。该研究包括2014年至2024年间发表的英文原创文章和评论。EndNote用于删除重复项。两位独立作者对剩余文献的标题和摘要进行了全面审查,以评估其纳入资格。在初步筛选之后,作者仔细分析了摘要并检查了全文,以确认其是否适合最终纳入。主要内容和发现:本次叙述性综述最终共纳入55篇文章。本文主要总结和分析超声(US)、x线、CT、MRI、核医学对OPAI的诊断价值,评价各成像技术的优缺点,并试图阐明该领域诊断成像方法的未来发展方向。结论:医学影像学对OPAI的诊断已得到多学科的认可。目前,迫切需要建立大规模、多中心的研究项目。值得注意的是,核医学诊断技术及其独特的代谢信息在OPAI诊断中的关键作用。