Development of a patient decision aid for people with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease considering lumbar fusion: A mixed-methods study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Yesung Cho, Marnee J McKay, Joshua R Zadro, Tammy Hoffmann, Chris G Maher, Ian Harris, Ralph Stanford, Manuela L Ferreira, Rachelle Buchbinder, Christopher S Han, Giovanni E Ferreira
{"title":"Development of a patient decision aid for people with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease considering lumbar fusion: A mixed-methods study.","authors":"Yesung Cho, Marnee J McKay, Joshua R Zadro, Tammy Hoffmann, Chris G Maher, Ian Harris, Ralph Stanford, Manuela L Ferreira, Rachelle Buchbinder, Christopher S Han, Giovanni E Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and user-test a patient decision aid providing evidence-based information for people with chronic low back pain (LBP) and degenerative disc disease considering lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Convergent parallel mixed methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A prototype patient decision aid was developed, guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) criteria, a multidisciplinary steering committee, and insights from previous studies. Participants were recruited via social media and the authors' collaborative networks to refine and evaluate the decision aid.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals who underwent lumbar fusion for chronic LBP and health professionals who manage these patients were purposively sampled.</p><p><strong>Primary and secondary outcomes: </strong>Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback and assess the decision aid's acceptability, usability, and preparedness for decision-making. Framework analysis was used for interview data and descriptive analysis for questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen clinicians (5 physiotherapists, 2 rheumatologists, 2 surgeons, 7 general practitioners) and seven patients participated, most rating the prototype's acceptability as 'excellent' or 'good'. Usability (mean [SD], health professionals: 78 [16], patients: 72 [8]) and preparedness for decision-making (health professionals: 73 [14], patients: 72 [10]) also scored highly. However, some viewed the prototype as biased against lumbar fusion, and suggestions to include more personalised information were made.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that our prototype patient decision aid is acceptable, useful, and prepares patients to make informed decisions about spinal fusion for chronic LBP and degenerative disc disease. Future studies will assess the clinical impact of our decision aid and its optimal distribution timing.</p>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"76 ","pages":"103261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and user-test a patient decision aid providing evidence-based information for people with chronic low back pain (LBP) and degenerative disc disease considering lumbar fusion.

Design: Convergent parallel mixed methods study.

Setting: A prototype patient decision aid was developed, guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) criteria, a multidisciplinary steering committee, and insights from previous studies. Participants were recruited via social media and the authors' collaborative networks to refine and evaluate the decision aid.

Participants: Individuals who underwent lumbar fusion for chronic LBP and health professionals who manage these patients were purposively sampled.

Primary and secondary outcomes: Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback and assess the decision aid's acceptability, usability, and preparedness for decision-making. Framework analysis was used for interview data and descriptive analysis for questionnaires.

Results: Sixteen clinicians (5 physiotherapists, 2 rheumatologists, 2 surgeons, 7 general practitioners) and seven patients participated, most rating the prototype's acceptability as 'excellent' or 'good'. Usability (mean [SD], health professionals: 78 [16], patients: 72 [8]) and preparedness for decision-making (health professionals: 73 [14], patients: 72 [10]) also scored highly. However, some viewed the prototype as biased against lumbar fusion, and suggestions to include more personalised information were made.

Conclusions: This study showed that our prototype patient decision aid is acceptable, useful, and prepares patients to make informed decisions about spinal fusion for chronic LBP and degenerative disc disease. Future studies will assess the clinical impact of our decision aid and its optimal distribution timing.

考虑腰椎融合的慢性腰痛和退行性椎间盘疾病患者决策辅助工具的开发:一项混合方法研究
目的:开发和用户测试一种患者决策辅助工具,为考虑腰椎融合的慢性腰痛(LBP)和退变性椎间盘疾病患者提供循证信息。设计:收敛并行混合方法研究。环境:在国际患者决策辅助标准(IPDAS)标准、多学科指导委员会和以往研究的见解的指导下,开发了一个患者决策辅助的原型。参与者是通过社交媒体和作者的合作网络招募的,以完善和评估决策辅助。参与者:接受腰椎融合术治疗慢性腰痛的个体和管理这些患者的卫生专业人员被有意取样。主要和次要结果:使用半结构化访谈和问卷来收集反馈并评估决策辅助的可接受性、可用性和决策准备。访谈资料采用框架分析,问卷调查采用描述性分析。结果:16名临床医生(5名物理治疗师,2名风湿病学家,2名外科医生,7名全科医生)和7名患者参与,大多数人认为原型的可接受性为“优秀”或“良好”。可用性(平均[SD],卫生专业人员:78 bbb,患者:72 bbb)和决策准备(卫生专业人员:73 bbb,患者:72 bbb)得分也很高。然而,一些人认为原型对腰椎融合有偏见,并建议包括更多的个性化信息。结论:本研究表明,我们的原型患者决策辅助是可接受的,有用的,并使患者对慢性腰痛和退行性椎间盘疾病的脊柱融合做出明智的决定。未来的研究将评估我们的决策辅助的临床影响及其最佳分配时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信