Which is easier for beginners: supine or prone position percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessment of the learning curve in novice urologists through a randomized clinical trial.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ahmed Zoeir, Hussein Mamdoh, Ayman Moussa, Ali Abdel-Raheem, Tarek Gameel, Ahmed Elsherbeny, Abdullah Al Debeiky, Khaled Almekaty, Maged Ragab, Ahmed Tawfik, Stefano Puliatti, Stefania Ferretti, Salvatore Micali, Silvia Proietti, Mon Mon Oo, Guido Giusti, Osama Elashry, Abdelhamid Elbahnasy, Magdy Sabaa, Mohamed Abo El-Enen, Giampaolo Bianchi, Ahmed Eissa
{"title":"Which is easier for beginners: supine or prone position percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessment of the learning curve in novice urologists through a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Ahmed Zoeir, Hussein Mamdoh, Ayman Moussa, Ali Abdel-Raheem, Tarek Gameel, Ahmed Elsherbeny, Abdullah Al Debeiky, Khaled Almekaty, Maged Ragab, Ahmed Tawfik, Stefano Puliatti, Stefania Ferretti, Salvatore Micali, Silvia Proietti, Mon Mon Oo, Guido Giusti, Osama Elashry, Abdelhamid Elbahnasy, Magdy Sabaa, Mohamed Abo El-Enen, Giampaolo Bianchi, Ahmed Eissa","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05974-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) could be performed in both prone and supine positions. Each position has its own advantages and disadvantages. \"Learning curve\" is a graph that represents progress of a skill against the time needed to master the technique. We hypothesized that supine PCNL might have a shorter learning curve by novice urologists compared to prone PCNL based on the findings of previous studies assessing the learning curve of both techniques. The aim of this study is to assess the learning curve of prone and supine PCNL among novice urologists to detect which is easier for the beginners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty patients undergoing PCNL for renal stones were included and divided into two groups; Group A included 75 patients undergoing supine PCNL and Group B included 75 patients undergoing prone PCNL. Subsequently, each group was subdivided into three subgroups of 25 patients to allow the evaluation of the learning curve of the two novice surgeons as regards: operative time, fluoroscopy time, stone free rate, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operative time in group A decreased from of 111.8±13.91 minutes to 84.2±15.86 minutes, and thereafter, decreased to 78.4±12.97 minutes in the three consecutive subgroups. Similarly, in group B, the mean operative time decreased from 122±23.76 minutes to 110.2±17.05 minutes, and thereafter, further decreased to 82±15.34 minutes. The operative time plateau was reached after 25 and 50 cases in groups A and B, respectively. The overall stone free rate, and complications were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both supine and prone PCNL are safe and effective; however, supine PCNL may be associated with significantly shorter learning curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"76 6","pages":"748-758"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05974-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) could be performed in both prone and supine positions. Each position has its own advantages and disadvantages. "Learning curve" is a graph that represents progress of a skill against the time needed to master the technique. We hypothesized that supine PCNL might have a shorter learning curve by novice urologists compared to prone PCNL based on the findings of previous studies assessing the learning curve of both techniques. The aim of this study is to assess the learning curve of prone and supine PCNL among novice urologists to detect which is easier for the beginners.

Methods: One hundred and fifty patients undergoing PCNL for renal stones were included and divided into two groups; Group A included 75 patients undergoing supine PCNL and Group B included 75 patients undergoing prone PCNL. Subsequently, each group was subdivided into three subgroups of 25 patients to allow the evaluation of the learning curve of the two novice surgeons as regards: operative time, fluoroscopy time, stone free rate, and complications.

Results: The mean operative time in group A decreased from of 111.8±13.91 minutes to 84.2±15.86 minutes, and thereafter, decreased to 78.4±12.97 minutes in the three consecutive subgroups. Similarly, in group B, the mean operative time decreased from 122±23.76 minutes to 110.2±17.05 minutes, and thereafter, further decreased to 82±15.34 minutes. The operative time plateau was reached after 25 and 50 cases in groups A and B, respectively. The overall stone free rate, and complications were comparable in both groups.

Conclusions: Both supine and prone PCNL are safe and effective; however, supine PCNL may be associated with significantly shorter learning curve.

对于初学者来说,仰卧位和俯卧位哪个更容易接受经皮肾镜取石?通过随机临床试验评估泌尿科新手的学习曲线。
背景:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)可在俯卧位和仰卧位进行。每个职位都有自己的优点和缺点。“学习曲线”是一个图表,表示一项技能的进步与掌握该技术所需的时间。根据先前评估两种技术学习曲线的研究结果,我们假设对于泌尿科新手来说,仰卧位PCNL比俯卧位PCNL有更短的学习曲线。本研究的目的是评估新手泌尿科医师俯卧位和仰卧位PCNL的学习曲线,以检测初学者更容易接受哪一种。方法:150例肾结石行PCNL患者分为两组;A组75例为仰卧位PCNL, B组75例为俯卧位PCNL。随后,每组再细分为三个亚组,每组25例患者,以评估两名新手外科医生的学习曲线:手术时间、透视时间、结石清除率和并发症。结果:A组平均手术时间由(111.8±13.91)min缩短至(84.2±15.86)min,此后连续3个亚组平均手术时间缩短至(78.4±12.97)min。B组平均手术时间由122±23.76分钟缩短至110.2±17.05分钟,再缩短至82±15.34分钟。A组25例,B组50例,均达到手术时间平台期。两组患者的结石总流失率和并发症具有可比性。结论:仰卧位和俯卧位PCNL均安全有效;然而,仰卧位PCNL可能与较短的学习曲线相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信